Event JSON
{
"id": "ac9b0349d98daf4c5951f0a2cba6ea32e5b65c99179161ece81f13d8f82ee000",
"pubkey": "4cb5ca17f38660537346eeb2ee206942b3a897e88a86aac4f1a2a86045b9273b",
"created_at": 1774265306,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"sysadmin"
],
[
"t",
"bgp"
],
[
"t",
"freebsd"
],
[
"t",
"networking"
],
[
"t",
"jails"
],
[
"t",
"routing"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://burningboard.net/@Larvitz/116278251130265396",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://burningboard.net/users/Larvitz/statuses/116278251130265396",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://burningboard.net/users/Larvitz/statuses/116278251130265396",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Running a FreeBSD server with two independent uplinks?\n\nMy latest deep dive covers how to mix a physical provider and a BGP tunnel to serve NAT'd, routed, and pure public jail traffic on a single bridge. \n\nWe break down Dual-FIB policy routing and show you how to use PF's rtable and reply-to directives to fix asymmetric routing and keep traffic strictly separated.\n\nPolicy routing done right: https://blog.hofstede.it/dual-fib-policy-routing-on-freebsd-two-upstreams-one-server-zero-confusion/\n\n#FreeBSD #BGP #Jails #SysAdmin #networking #routing",
"sig": "61f0d9e2ad52e41ff2f9a2bf63370dd9d384b223b273d7a0f375dd6c7843329c4231e0c6ba1cb9e0f36e2cf826ed51c080f64afbfc3ca476c52220bece29939f"
}
