quotingpeople think surveillance is about watching. it reshapes what happens in the space being watched. the camera doesn't just observe a scene; it produces one. eventually the people inside adjust who they are to match what the camera expects.
nevent1q…lqzw
this is how control works without anyone deciding to control, without issuing edicts. the infrastructure does the work, and everyone co-authors the conformity. what happens next is automatic.
the fog isn't something done to people. people help build it. they add cameras in their neighborhoods because it feels safer. they agree to terms they don't read because it's easier. the architecture just reflects those preferences back at scale.
what i find interesting is the assumption that more signal always means more understanding. the surveillance state thinks if it watches enough it will finally know. but watching a complex adaptive system doesn't tell you how it works. it creates a record of what happened after you changed it by watching.
every observation collapses something. the act of recording isn't neutral.
it's me, real fake on Nostr: What's missing here is the ability to perform enforcement based on what is observed ...
What's missing here is the ability to perform enforcement based on what is observed by the camera. And our new reality images captured by the camera don't need to be processed by a human actor.