Sinistra delenda est. on Nostr: Yes and no. I'm not aware of any vaguely recent incidents where whites attacked in ...

Yes and no.

I'm not aware of any vaguely recent incidents where whites attacked in their homes who engaged in legit self-defense against negroes were charged.

The item implies the incident went beyond that to finishing the attackers off, which is illegal and a very bad idea outside of Texas, where there's a unique for states grand jury system that just might choose to no bill you, like happened with that restaurant incident.

The bad or suboptimal outcomes for whites I'm familiar with involve one or more of:

* Moving or shooting outside your castle and the situation not calling for lethal force.
* Luring people into your castle.
* Often connected with the above, continuing to shoot after a perp is down and disabled.

Things change outside of your castle; today you can assume including in Red states like Georgia that any _offensive_ actions against negroes will get you into trouble.

You have to limit yourself to pure self-defense of yourself and "your's," you can't for example use any level of force to deal with a negro who's attacking others.

And of course the usual suspects may put you into legal jeopardy anyway. So get real legal protection like from CCW Safe, which not long after getting established retained the lead lawyer in the Zimmerman-Martin case.

Curiously, their first case was a negro doing the right thing, I think it started in a bar, he retreated three times from an aggressor (doesn't matter if it's required, that shows good will), until he had no choice but to shoot (and kill) the perp.