henjin on Nostr: The people in Substack comments were wrong. If I copy text generated by an LLM, then ...

The people in Substack comments were wrong. If I copy text generated by an LLM, then I usually indicate it's something an LLM said. People in Substack comments are so stupid that they think if someone writes a post that is longer than 100 characters and that is not full of grammatical errors, then they must be an AI.

I noticed that McCairn had accidentally left in Markdown blod formatting in one of his Substack posts, which looked similar to one of Greg Harrison's AI-hallucinated documents (in the bottom image): https://sars2.net/clot2.html#Fibrillar_structures_found_by_Kevin_McCairn_in_the_blood_of_a_3_year_old_exposed_to_a_vaccine_prenatally.

Then McCairn replied: "You're looking at a summary, generated off the article, that some one who I trust to review the document said it needed, the LLM output was better and more concise than my attempt, which leans towards a more verbose style. Hence leaving the markdown in for transparency."

But his post didn't say anywhere that it was generated by AI. It would've been more transparent to just write that it was an AI summary instead of "leaving the Markdown in for transparency". McCairn later edited the post to remove the Markdown bold formatting, but he still didn't mention anywhere that it was an AI summary.