nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpq45uz8hvqy9v3hgyhqxqhq3gdwrxzuhawwd60a9xtcr7t64zkgg6sceds9n (nprofile…ds9n) yeah, obviously the fact that the LLM's output comes from untraceable and sometimes stolen data is a problem.
My main point is that the SCOTUS considering that the output of an LLM is somehow the "creation" of software, instead of considering it the creation of a group of humans, is silly and wrong. It's as if they fell in the trap of considering as a separate entity as if it was some kind of actual artificial intelligence.. which it really is not.
Software doesn't "create" anything, and the output of a software like photoshop is not different from the output of software like a LLM, it's still created by humans in the first place. The only difference is that we can't easily track the origin of the LLM's output.
nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqpvyx4r5j6q286vdk0yz22lwkd35n0flcs306m8l3hn323h6q8apstlkmch (nprofile…kmch)
