nomadshiba⚡ on Nostr: who doesn't like bip110? there is nothing unreasonable about it. taproot doesn't need ...
who doesn't like bip110?
there is nothing unreasonable about it.
taproot doesn't need OP_IF defeats the whole purpose of it.
we don't need OP_RETURN bigger than 32bytes.
bip110 is being way to generous with 80bytes.
it fixes the problem, and breaks nothing.
its enforcing what was the default in the first place.
how could you possibly be against it?
unless you wanna turn exploits and bugs into features.
Published at
2026-02-21 23:47:04 CETEvent JSON
{
"id": "b928b4ea77fd7d4da1992c90979b5b4bbe9cbaa39d9bae867527ffef00db9a2e",
"pubkey": "45835c36f41d979bc8129830f2f5d92562f5343d6feddd6f30aa79480730f26e",
"created_at": 1771714024,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"alt",
"A short note: who doesn't like bip110?\n\nthere is nothing unreaso..."
]
],
"content": "who doesn't like bip110?\n\nthere is nothing unreasonable about it. \n\ntaproot doesn't need OP_IF defeats the whole purpose of it. \n\nwe don't need OP_RETURN bigger than 32bytes.\n\nbip110 is being way to generous with 80bytes.\n\nit fixes the problem, and breaks nothing.\n\nits enforcing what was the default in the first place.\n\nhow could you possibly be against it?\n\nunless you wanna turn exploits and bugs into features. ",
"sig": "bc72091836da2ffde12b3a6aac0c8b817e60e840a51836e95e8b913c3da95f1d0f52ef16d676da7ae1cc281afc86185a92d375971ed4189ee6d10276ca63b7d3"
}