When people claim that property is an inalienable right - likes freedoms of expression or association - then "property is theft", as Proudhon famously put it. But as long as they accept that property is a social agreement, subject to negotiation and consensus, then "property is freedom" (a lesser known quote from Proudhon).
Having said all that, being open to there being a place for markets in a free society does *not* make an anarchist right-leaning. It just makes them not a Stalinist.
(3/?)
