AndersL on Nostr: Sure, why not ...

Sure, why not

quoting
nevent1q…j2vk

After looking at every argument and consuming as much information as I can, considering my own bias and trying to be as objective as possible.

I've changed my mind about #core vs #knots
I no longer support either side.
The most objectively correct, reasoned and logical arguments I have seen have come from #monero advocates.

Spam and trying to turn Btc into media hosting or some kind of utility coin is retarded, so knots and bip110 is still better than core but it does not actually do anything to promote Bitcoin as money and it barely even addresses the spam problem. The bip110 obviously isn't a permanent solution it's just meant to create time for better solutions or force core to fork the chain themselves.

I think the Bitcoin community is too toxic for real solutions to be put forward and be accepted with enough consensus, even if the knots fork wins other things won't be addressed we will all end up using either privacy alt coins like monero or give up and use kyc lightning centralised around a handful of corporations or kyc stable coins centralised around a handful of corporations.

Instead of taking power away from private central banks to give to the public btc is on track to give that power to corporations.