Nostr'a Katılın
2025-08-31 12:38:52 UTC
in reply to

👺 奇诺[流浪者]👹 on Nostr: I don't think that AT Protocol will ever achieve real or meaningful decentralization. ...

I don't think that AT Protocol will ever achieve real or meaningful decentralization. It's too incoherent as a protocol with too many moving parts and not enough motivation or impetus for self-hosting or decentralization. It's almost *by design* disincentivized for decentralization. As I explained on Nostr:

> Bluesky, more proper, is (in AT Protocol terms) a whole platform: client/app, app view, firehoses, relays, PDSs, etc.. —All the moving parts that makes AT Protocol so incoherent and difficult to truly decentralize with self-hosting and independent providers (the only really viable self-hosting right now are PDSs, but +90% of users will never do this; There exist a couple alternative app-views, but nobody fully hosting out a complete AT Protocol platform as Bluesky is).

Activity Pub, despite its inherent problems on a technical level, is still much simpler at the end of the day. And Nostr, still, is even simpler and easier. Both Nostr and Activity Pub are far, far more decentralized than AT Protocol. And, I think, between them all, Nostr is the best hope for real decentralized networking based solely on its protocol architecture.