YODL

Any other fellow Unmasked Narcissist follows? Does it mean the account deems us narcissistic? It's a bot...right? 😅
(I'd muted it long ago, but on Nostur it seems those don't carry over sometimes)

2026-03-06 20:14:51 CET

- reply

I've got TENS OF THOUSANDS of sats, don't give a care for your measly 21 sats anyway 😏

2026-03-06 19:33:07 CET

- reply

I don't know why I bother using it, I've been asked to explain all but once (so like 4-5 times). It's shorthand/internet for "sarcastic"

2026-03-06 19:32:06 CET

- reply

"Some guy?!" This is The David (reborn). Master of the elements, swinger of clubs, grower of things. Assumed you knew him. You should follow if you don't

2026-03-06 18:37:56 CET

- reply

I take it back. Upon further reflection yours is funnier.

2026-03-06 18:36:38 CET

- reply

Better still, shout "No!" angrily.

2026-03-06 18:35:16 CET

- reply

Was so worth the effort /s

2026-03-06 18:34:06 CET

- reply

Yeah, a motivated cheater wouldn't have a problem. Several people now have admitted to using same starting word each day smh
There's also the chance, like lottery, the one day you forget to play it hits ☠️
Also, I like to try to tap into the spirits daily

2026-03-06 18:32:21 CET

- reply

Funniest burn of the day... so far

2026-03-06 17:24:40 CET

- reply

Keep your colon to yourself, no need to share, noshole

2026-03-06 17:24:02 CET

- reply

Was gonna reply with "lobstrocity" but didn't think you'd see, and the joke would be lost

2026-03-06 16:45:19 CET

- reply

If the string you past doesn't end in ".gif" do not send. It's nearly that simple. For tenor gifs, long press, share, copy. Ideally though, use nostr.build, but that's extra steps

2026-03-06 16:43:41 CET

- reply

I give up. Moving on with this question unanswered

2026-03-06 16:42:35 CET

- reply

Am I crazy? Or are yall gaslighting me. That is not a picture of any kind of mask

2026-03-06 14:48:26 CET

- reply

wtf that?

2026-03-06 14:45:32 CET

- reply

I know what bless your heart really means underneath, you can't fool me with that. You have to MEAN it :)

2026-03-05 19:59:30 CET

- reply

Boom! Got me

2026-03-05 19:59:14 CET

- reply

So lost rn. Carry on.
I like crusty forks btw

2026-03-05 15:33:50 CET

- reply

Evokes confusion and a little anger mostly, haha. I'll keep it in mind next time I find time to vibe on Claude a bit. Doing some manual labor atm. Try and do that, Claude!

2026-03-05 15:29:55 CET

- reply

A simple "thank you for sharing cool oldish school internet weirdness with me," would have done.
Catchy eh?! The twirling muffins get me every time 🥹🥲

2026-03-05 15:03:47 CET

- reply

I'll consider it, though I was hoping for a deeper understanding of why I'd wanna do such a thing. If I had to guess, it sort of clarifies some fundamental relationships or something.

2026-03-05 14:52:31 CET

- reply

For past life? I don't recall you doing anything negative. Unlike me, who spews hate and hubris from every orifice after a win

2026-03-05 14:31:10 CET

- reply

Oh damn. Crap luck 😤

2026-03-05 10:17:29 CET

- reply

I bet it's real smooth though 😻

2026-03-05 10:16:38 CET

- reply

Noticed yaddle had returned when I opened Damus. Still looking fine, girl

2026-03-05 08:25:01 CET

- reply

Weird, I don't see this reply on Nostur app. You're the third person I've seen this happening with recently. Annoying!
Anyway, yeah, something like that I think. I have this weird holy grail of a mug idea in my head, and I'm not sure how it got there, and the image isn't even fully formed lol. Lemme search and find a picture of what it might look like.
Sorry I can't be more specific, it's just one of those few things I have some idealized yet rough image of in my head, but when I come across it I'll know it and get myself one, and finally be able to check the box of "final mug achieved" haha.
Here's a few images I came across that are along the lines of what I'm picturing. I think it must be a general style of artisanal mug, as many share a similar look. Not sure exact optimal shape either...
https://i.nostr.build/e4qSgBWoaNLu91F8.webp
https://i.nostr.build/1TxNQbUiQigt1Lcj.jpg

2026-03-04 14:26:34 CET

- reply

Was funny is this was a solution on a somewhat recent NYTs one, which gave me the hardest time. But this time I was like, "wait a minute, it can't be!"

2026-03-04 14:24:43 CET

- reply

A bat loving woman perchance?

2026-03-04 14:24:14 CET

- reply

You should have gotten a hello from someone a few hours ago

2026-03-04 14:23:27 CET

- reply

Wasn't sure what you were gonna do with the 4 way tie, but this is perfect!

2026-03-04 13:02:43 CET

- reply

Oh shiiiiid

2026-03-04 12:50:39 CET

- reply

No that fell apart months ago

2026-03-04 12:48:45 CET

- reply

4 x 4 lfg

2026-03-04 05:57:58 CET

- reply

The old me (of a few hours ago) might have been upset by this. But I've grown since 🧘🏼

2026-03-03 19:38:26 CET

- reply

1-0-2

2026-03-03 18:48:34 CET

- reply

Ahh, the forbidden dance lol

2026-03-03 18:45:31 CET

- reply

Without getting too pedantic about it, what you gave was not really a proof. You could use a similar argument to say the rationals are larger than the naturals, when they are in fact not (a surprising discovery the first time it's shown using a constructive proof). The Cantor diagonalization thing is a proof by contradiction, and is a particularly powerful construction that gets used in many places, e.g. proving the halting problem.

2026-03-03 16:35:27 CET

- reply

It shows on nostur that it's 111 days old. I changed it to 112 to seem less autistic

2026-03-03 14:39:31 CET

- reply

Awesome for me, not your eternal souls though 😈
I haven't forgotten the "mush" gleeful shouts from yesterday.

2026-03-03 14:38:29 CET

- reply

4th one this year, but who's counting

2026-03-03 14:38:06 CET

- reply

Can it, cypher! My turn 2 was more difficult than yours

2026-03-03 14:36:44 CET

- reply

Well, how do you know I don't prefer to keep my piss? It's mine! Point taken though

2026-03-03 14:35:38 CET

- reply

It's a rarity these days, but on rare occasion. It's a shit show of coordination and weed haze that rarely comes together though

2026-03-03 06:58:08 CET

- reply

@npub18w7…s7pw you're the artist, but if I may try to provide you with a little inspiration today (consider you may be rewarded with extra rations...maybe), I was thinking something like this:
https://i.nostr.build/jph0Hjvz03PtUs0T.jpg

2026-03-03 06:53:43 CET

- reply

Get your mush bowls ready, fools!

2026-03-03 06:53:17 CET

- reply

You're not the smartest waifu (with a saber 😳), but you're my waifu 🥰

2026-03-03 06:44:32 CET

- reply

You don't want this smoke, beejay 🔪

2026-03-03 06:43:37 CET

- reply

Ah ok, thanks Chris, thought that might be the reference but wasn't sure.
Jon, that's not quite a proof that he gave though. The famous proof is known as Camtor's diagonalisation argument, and it's a proof by contradiction. The usual development is to go over some infinite hotel cases to first show how it's a slippery concept (countable many countable infinities is still countable), then show (again to push the intuition) naturals and rationals have same size, and finally to show it can't be done for naturals and reals with a diagonalization proof:
Usually do it for just the reals from 0 to 1 (without loss of generality). Assume you have a 1-1 mapping from N to the interval. List out all the reals in decimal notation according to this mapping, r1 on first row, r2 on next, etc. Define new real by taking the "diagonal" of this and changing the value. This number is nowhere in your list 🤯
Worth looking up for a proper proof with all the little details.
The next question is usually, "are there infinities between these two? Known as continuum hypothesis, and it drive Cantor mad, they say. It's been shown since that it's consistent and independent that there are or there aren't 🤯

2026-03-03 06:29:21 CET

- reply

Yaddle is a baddie

2026-03-03 06:25:45 CET

WORD5 #515 2/6* (Hard Mode)
🟧⬛⬛🟧⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://word5.otherstuff.ai

2026-03-02 17:41:26 CET

- reply

Missed out on some massive good fortune though

2026-03-02 14:38:47 CET

- reply

Doh! Well, maybe if I set vpn to Canada it's believable

2026-03-02 10:29:21 CET

- reply

You have ... a saber?

2026-03-02 10:18:09 CET

- reply

You can wield my saber anytime 😘

2026-03-02 10:17:29 CET

- reply

She's female?! 😍
https://i.nostr.build/ZgiWiJHukNcVEcaR.jpg

2026-03-02 10:15:35 CET

- reply

You tell him yaddle 🥰

2026-03-02 10:14:49 CET

- reply

https://i.nostr.build/XAZkAxQ8C2iUC6zy.jpg

2026-03-02 09:24:23 CET

- reply

Beat it, Chad!

2026-03-02 08:57:21 CET

- reply

I'd only seen this example and was mostly teasing cuz of the nya waah bit. That's cool. My only complaint is finding the site, I obviously can never remember the url, and seem to have lost it. I'll go to your feed to find it again

2026-03-02 08:36:51 CET

- reply

Browser LLM a bit weak I'm guessing.

2026-03-02 08:31:52 CET

- reply

Tifa needs an iq boost.

2026-03-02 07:54:59 CET

- reply

Oh, why didn't you just say so from the beginning?! You're expecting me to connect far too many dots. Is the scaling really THAT good? You don't need to answer my stupid questions any further, you've done enough for one day. Just sorta assuming that's the case, and am heartened to learn of this. Cheap and powerful local LLMs is a future I can cheer for.

2026-03-02 07:51:33 CET

- reply

Nice work!!

2026-03-02 07:51:18 CET

- reply

gd it! I'll begin preparation of my bhole 😣

2026-03-02 07:48:33 CET

- reply

Knew my score wouldn't hold up. Now to wish good luck to our other two regulars. May they score 3 or better (not really, I'm hoping to jinx them).

2026-03-02 07:46:05 CET

- reply

Ahhh, thanks! I did test it and was amazed at how fast it seemed to run. Guess that's the selling point. But seriously, I can ignore such AI sideshows, yes? I can't picture a future where chat Jimmy is around for the long run, so I wanna just free up some of my own RAM and ignore its existence.

2026-03-02 07:37:48 CET

- reply

I'm a bit ashamed to admit this doesn't mean much to me. I don't have room in my brain to learn of yet another AI service. Is it safe to just only pay attention to OpenAI and Anthropic, and just focus on learning their capabilities? Please say yes!
Did you see anthropic released some free online "courses" to learn their software? Seriously considering checking them out.
https://i.nostr.build/As13m33qt1q5U4RT.jpg

2026-03-02 07:20:48 CET

- reply

Not just words, but boring words, about royal family ugh

2026-03-01 22:29:47 CET

- reply

Good book (Moby Dick)? Never wanted to read it for some reason. Think I've heard it described as a bit of a chore by a couple people.

2026-03-01 22:06:59 CET

- reply

Will ask for it next time I go to Fridays

2026-03-01 22:06:17 CET

- reply

Oh btw David. Rereading (on audio this time around) Gunslinger lol. You mentioning it made me wanna revisit it

2026-03-01 22:05:01 CET

- reply

lol, I realize that now. Should have known to cancel the drink when bartender had to look up the recipe 🤦‍♂️
Wonder now if he even had rose water, or if he improvised that. Looked like a shitty glass of milk when it was served, and took 10 minutes to make 💀

2026-03-01 22:01:13 CET

- reply

Ok. I once ordered a Ramos gin fizz after some fancy pants NYC finance friend turned me into them, and got a very annoyed bartender who had to look up how to make, and the resulting drink was a disaster. Granted, I was at a TGI Fridays 🫣

2026-03-01 21:59:28 CET

- reply

Are you the gate keeper?
https://media1.tenor.com/m/iWT1Dtw2ScoAAAAC/keymaster-rick.gif

2026-03-01 19:46:55 CET

- reply

Well kick me some sausage, yes yes.

2026-03-01 16:28:31 CET

- reply

The spinning princess pickle is so cute 🥰

2026-03-01 15:55:48 CET

- reply

Thankee

2026-03-01 08:53:03 CET

- reply

Hey there, Horszt. Yeah, it's necessary sometimes. Believe me, in the past, on other platforms, I pretty much didn't post at all. But with nostr, imo, it's a pretty dead experience unless you just blast out some words, even if they're nothing special

2026-03-01 08:49:15 CET

- reply

I was pleased with my result. Figured I was safe from whatever terrible punishment Defaux is cooking up today. You, on the other hand... I'd be nervous right about now 🫂

2026-03-01 08:38:46 CET

- reply

I've been trying to get a play list together here and there the past couple days. It must be perfect! Give me another week or so, and I'll have it. I actually wanna try to use AI to mix, think that'd be cool. Thanks for suggesting that btw.

2026-03-01 08:32:26 CET

- reply

DMs are for ignoring entirely, or for exchanging Signal invites to actually secure DMs.

2026-03-01 08:27:11 CET

- reply

Hahaha...jokes...we love jokes here. You are joking, right? These books are so cooked, I can't tell what's real at this point. I've been using Anthropic to sift through and make some sense of it, but even it is struggling. Wish there was some sort of immutable ledger of some sort we could refer to.
I trust you though. Or rather, I trust you to follow your self preservatory incentives 🔪🤫

2026-03-01 08:23:39 CET

- reply

Yeah man, we're good on "finger butties" for a while.

2026-03-01 08:23:01 CET

- reply

Lol...feels more like DMs right now, ngl.

2026-03-01 08:20:12 CET

- reply

Yeah, not all that uncommon. I don't actually judge about it at all. Have known a few people over the years who met that way and dated a while. It's got the benefit of getting one exposed to people outside their friends and family group, but there are downsides too. You lose the pheromone/IRL attractiveness screening, not to mention the number of lunatics you can encounter online. Yin and yang I guess.

2026-03-01 08:17:05 CET

- reply

Shit, you already said "bomb" earlier, lol. Dammit. I feel pretty dumb now.

2026-03-01 08:16:36 CET

- reply

Lol, good points you make, and I have no idea. Now that I think about it, I think it's "wack." But then I feel like I've seen "whack sauce" written before, so I'm not so sure. Trying to think of another old school slang now...let's see...
That's the bomb? That's the Bombay Saphire (for an extra cool twist). That's all I've got

2026-03-01 08:11:27 CET

- reply

I thrive on the slow mornings, relatively speaking. Not night time so much, like now, but generally I find myself posting more on Saturday or Sunday mornings. It's the full group chat experience I guess.

2026-03-01 08:08:18 CET

- reply

Dead. Somehow I can't picture you on Tinder. Tinder just seems somehow beneath you. #Grindstr maybe 🤭

2026-03-01 08:06:54 CET

- reply

Hadn't heard bomb dot com in a long while, lol. I often take bad pics of my food, so bad that I can't post them, lest I give off the impression of being a homeless trash rummager or something. Need to work on that

2026-03-01 08:04:24 CET

- reply

I wish you were female now 😍

2026-03-01 08:03:55 CET

- reply

Ah, makes sense. I guess Euro-nostr really is much smaller than the already pretty small larger nostr. You guys need to step it up!

2026-03-01 08:02:32 CET

- reply

No way, Jose. I truly want you to do extra well.

2026-03-01 08:00:27 CET

- reply

Hadn't even translated it, but definitely would not have understood it even with. Flipped over to Damus to get the translation just now. European construction (from what little I've seen) moves a bit slower than in the States, no?

2026-03-01 07:54:59 CET

- reply

This incomprehensible note was the only visible difference
#nevent1q…w7n0

2026-03-01 07:54:04 CET

- reply

I'm wishing you all the best. May you ace this one 😇