wymike

Public Key

npub1ncrx9aecyw72ft2qpcnvdu469ak0d8ttn4prs0exvty9s3hwu9vsrvg998

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsfupnz7uuz809y44qqufkx72az7m8kn44e6s3c8unx9jzcgmhwzkgpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dskuxw99

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1ncrx9aecyw72ft2qpcnvdu469ak0d8ttn4prs0exvty9s3hwu9vsrvg998

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-07-29 05:58:54 UTC

- reply

So I searched someone who follows you and scrolled through their follows list. Found you there and opened your page. When I went back to search and typed in flash you were the 1st result.

2026-07-29 05:51:12 UTC

- reply

Interesting, just tried and can’t find this account either. Must be an issue with the search.

2026-07-22 20:54:17 UTC

- reply

What convinced her?

2026-07-13 21:23:16 UTC

- reply

If the earth is flat then this photo should be repeatable.
It wouldn’t take that much effort (considering we’ve put a mirror on the moon) to put a mirror on one of the peaks and bounce a laser of it to prove it’s actually the peak we’re seeing and not something else.
Currently this 1 photo has a long way to go to be held up as proof is a flat earth.

2026-07-11 20:07:54 UTC

- reply

By this logic can I claim ownership of an abandoned building?

2026-07-09 02:46:58 UTC

- reply

Is it the skin? My mum grew some that had really bitter skin, once peeled they were fine.

2026-07-04 02:05:42 UTC

- reply

What makes the rules that are already there not arbitrary?
I’m in favour of whatever keeps Bitcoin a primarily monetary network.
Right now I’m struggling to see how allowing more, random , non monetary transaction related data helps Bitcoin be a1st and foremost monetary network.

2026-06-27 02:37:58 UTC

- reply

I must have got a bad copy of the video. I didn’t see any proof of anything or learn any rules of the game 🤷

2026-06-26 20:16:38 UTC

- reply

If you had a weather station at your house then you might get a record temperature there. Until then they’ll be recorded where the weather stations are, which primarily at airports.

2026-06-26 12:54:31 UTC

- reply

50:50 chance of turning 1 sat into 1,000BTC? Absolutely, it’s a completely loaded bet. Even if I only have 10 sats to start with the chances of loosing every time are incredibly small and only 1 win is required.

2026-06-23 17:58:21 UTC

- reply

Is that really the best attitude if we want more people to adopt the technology though? These kind of hurdles hurt adoption and will end up with more people having their corn in custody rather than self custody which isn’t good for them or us. 🤷

2026-06-23 14:16:29 UTC

- reply

Exactly my thoughts. I’ve all notifications off for 3-4years now. My phone is a tool that I use when I want to, not something that dictates to me what to do and when.

2026-06-23 14:15:17 UTC

- reply

I can’t speak to if these things would work but even if they do many people will not know how to.

2026-06-22 02:47:30 UTC

- reply

Took my kid to see Toy Story 5 yesterday. I really enjoyed it.

2026-06-21 02:19:46 UTC

- reply

I don’t think many people ‘hate’ Jesus. Just because you don’t love something doesn’t mean you hate it.
My assumption would be that most people who are not Christians really don’t have any strong feelings about him either way.

2026-06-19 14:58:58 UTC

- reply

Controversial opinion but I hate coffee. I find the smell repulsive.

2026-06-19 14:56:23 UTC

There’s a lot more pictures of food here now that the BCH crowd showed up. I’ve never had any interest in looking at other people’s dinner.

2026-06-19 02:00:23 UTC

- reply

We all know history is littered with examples of well run countries that failed because of what there citizens said 👀

2026-06-19 01:50:35 UTC

- reply

Nothing happens when I click any of the buttons 🤷

2026-06-16 15:43:20 UTC

- reply

Not the best long term strategy for humanity though, if that matters to you.

2026-06-16 15:37:02 UTC

- reply

You got me. I need to know why 😅

2026-05-29 15:17:25 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…27wz let us know what the outcome is pls

2026-05-26 02:01:04 UTC

- reply

People not being diagnosed does not mean it was not there.
By this logic skin cancer rates were 0 in 1800 because no one was diagnosed with it.

2026-05-17 15:21:04 UTC

- reply

Yeah, philanthropists are arseholes. Nothing good ever came from philanthropy.

2026-05-17 15:15:38 UTC

- reply

So some who worked for Lumis then. Not actually Lumis.

2026-05-14 19:00:24 UTC

- reply

I didn’t mention anything about opposites, I just don’t believe in one more god than you.
I was raised Christian, went to Sunday school and then church when I was older. Once I was old enough to think critically for myself I decided it wasn’t for me. I have no issues with the general principles espoused I just don’t think, on the balance of evidence, that there is a god.
And if we’re throwing shade at people who don’t believe the same things as us, I find it sad that some people feel the need to tell others their life would be better if only they’d believe the same things as them.

2026-05-14 07:47:15 UTC

- reply

Except most countries that date is 11/9 so…

2026-05-14 07:43:30 UTC

- reply

To paraphrase Ricky Gervais;
There are hundreds of gods that others believe in that you don’t. I just don’t believe in one more.

2026-04-26 09:57:37 UTC

- reply

Maybe not eliminate but:
No state = no state assistance = less incentive to travel to that place if you don’t have a means of supporting yourself.
Also
No state = no taxes paid in order to pay for state assistance = less animosity towards ‘illegals’ for using said state assistance.

2026-04-23 03:12:10 UTC

- reply

🤜🤛👊🤺

2026-04-22 16:10:52 UTC

- reply

Power and money obviously.
Not sure how it garners anyone power and money but, you know, reasons…

2026-04-22 15:00:39 UTC

- reply

From the comment you’re replying to I quote; “the Stellarium software, on which they depend for predicting occlusion times, is intended for star observation session planning, not exact timing. It can be a minute or two off at times, and atmospheric conditions add more potential errors.”

2026-04-22 14:09:46 UTC

- reply

Best globe earth proofs, off the top of my head, in no particular order:
Ships disappearing over the horizon from the bottom up not just getting smaller until you can’t see them anymore. (Same for mountains or any distant tall object).
The mathematics of navigating using the stars and a sextant that work in the real world but would not work if we were not on a globe.
Plane flight paths which follow an apparently curved route but when mapped on a globe is a straight line. (And no I don’t believe all the private aviation companies in the world are somehow in on the conspiracy.)
A laser beam projected out level to the ground does not stay level but appears to rise at exactly the rate predicted if we were on a globe with a circumference the same as that which we have calculated for the earth.
Our model of the earth which can explain how it formed and what its structure is which is supported by P and S waves from earthquakes.
Constellations getting lower in the sky as you travel south in the northern hemisphere and or as you travel north in the southern hemisphere.
The fact that different constellations are visible in the northern and southern hemisphere.

2026-04-22 01:56:19 UTC

- reply

If this experiment does suggest a flat earth…
1) we have this big pile of experiments and evidence over hear suggesting the earth is a globe and this 1 experiment here suggesting it’s flat. Occam’s razor would suggest the earth is a globe but there is a gap in our understanding ( or methodology, or data analysis of the 1 experiment) that needs reconciled.
2) we have this big pile of experiments and evidence over hear suggesting the earth is a globe and this 1 experiment here suggesting it’s flat.
Throw out all of the well established evidence because1 experiment appears to contradict it.
I’m ok with 2 IF an explanation can be given as to why each and every experiment and observation for a globe earth can be explained and a new model for each presented that can reliably predict what we observe in the real world.

2026-04-20 02:36:45 UTC

- reply

😮‍💨 it’s so hard trying to have a conversation with someone who point blank refuses to engage with anything you say.
It’s evident that anything I attempt to present as proof will be dismissed because you are more interested in being right than knowing the truth.
Lets me break it down into bite size chunks for you because I do t have handy memes to convey my points.
1) Yet to meet anyone who went to school before the 1970s and claims they were taught the earth was flat.
2) Know people personally who have navigated at sea using a sextant that would not work if the earth was flat.
3) Huge body of scientific work that dating back to the 3rd century BC supporting the concept that the earth is a globe not flat.
You claim I don’t understand first principles or the scientific method so enlighten me. What scientific method and 1st principles have you used to establish that the earth is flat?

2026-04-19 18:37:50 UTC

- reply

Even the church eventually accepted that a flat earth was not the centre of the universe after initially excommunicating Galileo.

2026-04-19 18:35:47 UTC

- reply

“Who says the consensus has been a globe for the last 4000 years?”
That’s my bad, I changed the question to one which is easier to challenge. Well done you for spotting it and taking the opportunity to answer with a question of your own while simultaneously avoiding answering my original question.
To answer your question; “Who says the consensus has been a globe for the last 4000 years?” The body of scientific work produced over that period, some of which I have alluded to earlier in our conversation, all of which you dismissed.
If, as you claim, the common assumption was that the earth was flat pre 1970’s it should be easy to find some evidence of that in the scientific literature or educational text books. An extremely brief, not so thorough, internet search didn’t turn up any thing for me except for the misconception that everyone in the Middle Ages thought the earth was flat which found its way into educational texts. This is not to be confused with education in the late twentieth century teaching that the earth actually was flat for which I did not see any evidence. However, I remain confident that you will have some examples on hand to dissuade me of my ill conceived notions on this.
As a personal anecdote; I don’t know how old you are but I know people who went to school before the 1970s and none of them were taught that the earth was flat.
Additional personal anecdote; Why would mariners make their lives more difficult than necessary by making and using maps and navigation techniques that assume a globe earth rather than flat? And before you say they don’t, I have friends and family who are sailors and have used said techniques while navigating at sea. Techniques that simply would not work if the earth was flat.
To return to your point about the TV being a powerful brainwashing tool, I do agree with you on that. Not as powerful as social media though. Which, as we know came into our lives at a much later date than TV and the advent of which is not far from the increase in talk of, and belief in, a flat earth. If we’re looking for correlations between introduction of technology and change in opinions about previously established ‘facts’ I would posit that the correlation is stronger for social media > flat earth than TV > globe earth.
But, if you are correct and we have been brainwashed via TV about the shape of the earth who decided to do it and why? And how did they convince all world governments to get on board with the lie? Surely I don’t need to remind you that the US and USSR were deep in the Cold War during the 1970s. Are you suggesting they were ready to start a nuclear war against each other but at the same time colluding to brainwash their populations about the shape of the earth? To what end? The space program would have had just as mush validity if the earth were flat, we would still want to know what was above and below us.
And if we’re saying that the government knew that the earth was flat before the space program, how did they know? How did they find out? And most importantly what incentivised them to lie about it?
And if it’s all just about money and the space program was just about siphoning money away from people for the elites to put in their piggy banks don’t you think there are easier ways to do that which don’t involve such elaborate and hard to execute lies?
Here’s a counter proposal for you.
Which the advent of social media, people with marginalised views could find other people with similar views and form communities around those views. The human need for acceptance drove that desire to find people who accepted you.
As social media developed a monetary incentive emerged to create and share content. Growing your community now had 2 incentives drivers, the need for acceptance and money.
Back over to you.

2026-04-19 16:15:47 UTC

- reply

Interesting. I’ll have an oversupply of dates in a few months. How easy was it to freeze dry them?

2026-04-19 16:13:11 UTC

- reply

Do you need to freeze dry dates? They keep pretty well anyway.

2026-04-19 16:00:29 UTC

- reply

Humour this retard for a moment.
Let’s assume everything you’ve just said is correct, I haven’t tried to answer any questions, I’m just hiding behind maths and I’m just parroting what the government tells me. I need help to escape the cult I’m in. I’m not inclined to leave because someone calls me a retard but maybe if you could answer the question below in terms simple enough for this retard to understand I might start thinking more deeply about my world view and the foundations on which it is built.
Why was the consensus of the earth being a globe prevalent for the last 4000 years in the absence of the US government’s intervention in the conversation?
If you can manage it please try and answer without calling me a retard again.

2026-04-19 15:40:09 UTC

- reply

If none of the examples I have given are good enough then nothing will be.
I have tried to answer questions and provide a rudimentary overview of the evidence. You on the other hand repeated refuse to engage with the question I have asked that as far as I can tell is central to your world view.
In general I do normally engage in conversation by acting respectfully and not personally attacking people who don’t agree with me as I am doing here. Is this how you normally engage in conversation, by calling people retards?
Not exactly sure what part of what I am doing is retarded or acting as a victim, you’ll have to expand on that personal attack a bit first me to able to correct it.
Call me out all you like. The problem with that, for you, is that attacking me as a person does not invalidate the points I’m making or question I’m asking. To do that you have to show the arguments to be invalid and answer the question in such a way as to have the answer support your argument.

2026-04-19 15:21:17 UTC

- reply

Did you read what I wrote? I’m actively trying to avoid using your logical fallacy of choice in order to keep the discussion about the arguments.
Despite my repeated requests you still refuse to offer any answer to my question. If you won’t answer the question can you at least explain why you refuse to engage with it?

2026-04-19 15:03:05 UTC

- reply

Have a look back over our conversation.
How many times have you attacked me in place of my arguments?
Attacking the person rather than the argument suggests either a lack of ability to convey your ideas and or lack of any solid grounding of ideas in the first place.
Despite whatever thoughts I might have about you personally I have been careful throughout to try and avoid attacking you personally because it does not help in making my point, it just makes me look petty.
If you truly believe that the earth is flat or level or whatever other semantic games you want to play it would behoove you to actually think about my question and try and reconcile it with your world view. If you come up with an answer that has logical reasoning to it then I’m all ears to hear it.

2026-04-19 14:50:53 UTC

- reply

Ad hominem attack ✅
Engaging with the question ❌
Seems to a trend forming.
It’s ok to say you don’t know.

2026-04-19 14:48:36 UTC

- reply

To be honest I was getting a bit worried that you might catch my retardation if you kept liking my replies😂.
I never actually expected an answer.
It is disappointing though that flat earthers so often throw out critical thinking as an attack on those who don’t agree but when given the chance, refuse to actually apply it themselves.
I pivoted away from maths based proofs to an argument based purely on logic and reasoning to allow for a more open debate.
What really tickles me is that most flat earthers appear to believe (or not realise, or not care ) that the US government is not the only government.

2026-04-19 14:16:37 UTC

- reply

True, but the question didn’t state central banks.

2026-04-19 14:15:30 UTC

- reply

More deflection, ad hominem attacks and avoiding my question.
Is that because you don’t have an answer?
There was no mention of being good or bad in my answer about banks. Just a statement of facts about why fiat is used.

2026-04-19 07:59:18 UTC

- reply

Ease or portability and to allow for fractional reserve banking which allows them to make more money than they otherwise could.
Now stop avoiding my question and try giving an answer that’s not an ad hominem attack.
If you answer is profit you need to at least some framework under which all governments for the last 4000 years have financial benefited from the lie.

2026-04-19 02:27:16 UTC

- reply

It’s been observed since the mid 19th century, but ok, if you say it doesn’t happen it must not.

2026-04-19 02:09:42 UTC

- reply

Still avoiding the question.
Explain to me the incentive for every government lie about the shape of the earth for the last 4000 years?

2026-04-18 17:32:23 UTC

- reply

Maybe I am retard maxing but you are avoiding the question.

2026-04-18 17:26:42 UTC

- reply

But we do see gyroscopic procession on earth…

2026-04-18 10:20:15 UTC

- reply

Explain to me the incentive for every government lie about the shape of the earth for the last 4000 years?

2026-04-18 10:06:54 UTC

- reply

If gyroscopes hold their rigidity in space (which I agree they do in the absence of external forces which is not the case on earth, gravity) and if the earth was flat and not rotating, wouldn’t you expect to see no procession?
If the earth was a rotating globe wouldn’t you expect to see apparent gyroscopic procession the gyroscope remains fixed in space and the earth moves underneath it?
Which of these things do we observe in the real world, procession or no procession?

2026-04-18 09:58:18 UTC

- reply

It’s hilarious that you can’t see the irony of your words.
The earth being a sphere has been known for 4000 years.
Explain to me the incentive for every government lie about the shape of the earth for the last 4000 years?

2026-04-18 09:13:57 UTC

- reply

Ok…

2026-04-18 09:02:12 UTC

- reply

Not sure what you’re talking about with gyroscopes. Gyroscopic processing perfectly measures the rotation of the earth and procession changes with latitude consistent with a globe.
Aircraft, ships, and missiles use inertial navigation systems (INS) which rely on gyroscopes to maintain orientation without external reference. They must account for Earth’s rotation and curvature to remain accurate

2026-04-18 02:34:22 UTC

- reply

So what we’re going with is that all governments around the world since the second century BC have been conspiring to hide the fact that the Earth is flat by telling us it’s a globe?
Not gonna lie, that seems like a bit of a stretch.

2026-04-18 02:23:05 UTC

- reply

Are you saying you can prove the earth is flat?

2026-04-18 02:19:03 UTC

- reply

Pythagoras and Aristotle argued that the Earth was round based on observations such as curved shadows on the moon during eclipses and ships disappearing over the horizon. These are qualitative arguments much as your “I can’t see any curvature” is.
Eratosthenes, in the third century BC, used the neat little trick that you could do yourself today. He measured the shadow cast by a vertical object at two different locations (Syrene and Alexandria) and then used his observations and maths to calculate the circumference of the Earth. If you care you can look up the details.
P and S waves, the waves created during an earthquake, can be used not only to show the Earth is round but they also help us to understand what the earth is made of. Again easy to look up and find explanations for if you care to.
Your comment about using a spirit level to show that the Earth is flat is fundamentally and technically flawed. If you wanted to use a spirit level to show that the Earth was flat the level wouldn’t need to be over 200m long. Look up the Sagitta formula if you care to know why. The mistake you have made here is not taking into account the relative scales of the thing that you are trying to measure and the thing that you’re measuring with.
You can use a similar method such as shining a laser beam over 500m or so to demonstrate the Earth either being flat or curved and the results are consistent with a global not a flat earth. Again using these observations and a little maths, you can calculate the curvature of the earth.
You can use a sextant to measure the angle above the horizon of Polaris. In the northern hemisphere as you travelled further south Polaris gets lower in the sky. This observation is consistent with a globe Earth and, again, with some measurements and the little maths you can calculate the curvature of the Earth.
I’ve giving you 4 examples of
Observation + measurement + maths = proof in support of a globe earth and explained why using a 30 cm spirit level does not work to show that the Earth is flat. Please help this max retard understand the error of his ways by giving me comparable proofs that the Earth is flat.

2026-04-17 03:18:44 UTC

- reply

200Hz ≠ 7.83Hz. How is that resonance forming?
The ‘Bees shouldn’t be able to fly’ myth was based on the assumption that their wings functioned in the same way as a fixed airplane wing, which they don’t.

2026-04-17 02:51:53 UTC

- reply

Prediction + observation + mathematical explanation = proof.
All flat earthers conveniently miss out the last part because they don’t have any mathematical explanations for how a flat earth works.

2026-04-17 02:48:49 UTC

- reply

Great comeback.
You’ve without doubt proved me wrong in all areas.
Congratulations, your ad hominem attacks are far more effective at explaining how and why I’m wrong than any logic or reasoning ever could.

2026-04-16 18:25:10 UTC

- reply

I really hope you’re just trolling with this flat earth stuff because it’s a real indictment of the education system if you’re not.

2026-04-16 18:23:11 UTC

- reply

Curvature that you can’t see - ships disappearing over the horizon not enough for you?
Spin but you can’t feel it - ever been in a plane? Doesn’t feel like your doing 400mph does it?
Space but you can’t go to it - says who? Flat earthers say you can’t then hold it up as proof that it doesn’t exist, circular logic.
Force but you can’t measure it - are you talking about gravity? Weight is a direct result of gravity as is acceleration due towards the earth.
None of these arguments holds up against even the most basic of counter arguments.
What really irks me though is the flat earth comunity not understanding how things work and then misusing and misrepresenting science to try and explain their cockamamy views.
I get through the day just fine using all the technology developed by the same maths and science that prove the earth is a globe.
Which technologies did you use today developed by the maths of a flat earth?

2026-04-16 18:14:32 UTC

- reply

This equation explains how stars work, how nuclear bombs work, how energy and matter are related and is therefore critical in our understanding of how the universe we observe around us formed.
If you wanted to make that point you needed to choose a more obscure equation that is not so fundamental to our understanding of reality.
All you’ve done here is show how little you understand.

2026-04-16 13:59:38 UTC

- reply

So now maths is a conspiracy as well now?
There are mathematical models that describe perfectly what we see in the real world. These models also describe a globe earth not flat or level or whatever non globe terminology you are pushing.
There are no such equations for flat / level earthers to fall back on. Your entire argument is based solely on observable phenomena with no attempt to produce and test a hypothesis.
There is no cope here. I have no stake in the shape of the earth. I don’t benefit either way. But the absurdity of the claims are just too wild to ignore. Stop following the ‘evidence’ and follow the science. Unless of course you are subscribing to the theory that all science is a scam in which case you should still using your computer and your phone because they were made using the same science describes a flat earth

2026-04-16 01:39:57 UTC

- reply

A mathematical body of work that explains everything we see.

2026-04-14 15:17:43 UTC

- reply

This is wild. Can you link any studies?

2026-04-13 13:20:07 UTC

- reply

How do you (or anyone for that matter) benefit from the earth being flat?
Why do you care so much?
Presumably all scientists who have created new technology (satalites / GPS / mobile phones) over the last 50 or so years are in on it because they need to understand the physics of how the world works in order for these inventions to work.
Who’s was coordinating this conspiracy for the last 2000+ years? (a Greek guy was the first to show the earth was round right?)
Before NASA who was in charge of running the conspiracy?

2026-04-10 16:39:13 UTC

- reply

So tired you’ve barely stopped meddling in other countries affairs since WWII 🧐

2026-04-04 07:49:00 UTC

- reply

Presumably every other country and company that has ever put anything in space is in on the same giant scam?
I’m impressed with your tenacity in spite of the overwhelming body of evidence in opposition to your hypothesis.

2026-03-28 20:03:27 UTC

- reply

Cheatcode

2026-03-27 01:09:18 UTC

- reply

What possible reason can be given to justify ceasing a bike if you’re riding at more than 25km/hr?
Does this mean that every recreational cyclist who goes out riding now takes part in an illegal hobby every time they go out riding?

2026-03-20 02:43:13 UTC

- reply

😂

2026-03-20 01:55:33 UTC

- reply

Neither- shataf is the only way

2026-03-18 14:01:25 UTC

- reply

Teal

2026-03-11 15:01:46 UTC

- reply

I hate going to countries that don’t have a shataf in the bathroom. Heathens.

2026-03-09 10:27:58 UTC

- reply

Easy to say from the other side of the world

2026-02-28 18:34:45 UTC

- reply

Falling debris from an intercept. Apparently 4 people injured.

2026-02-28 02:54:58 UTC

- reply

I have personally seen Saturn, with my own eyes, through a telescope. It looked more like the ‘fake’ image you’re presenting than the ‘real’ image. And that wasn’t even a particularly powerful telescope.
Some of your conspiracy theories are so laughable it makes me wonder are you just trying to deflect attention from genuine conspiracies that have genuine consequences if true?

2026-02-21 19:54:54 UTC

- reply

Haven’t seen tent pegs like that since I was in the scouts xx years agoz
(xx = too many 😬)

2026-02-19 09:43:04 UTC

- reply

B - teachers
Image a world where all teachers understood the value proposition of Bitcoin and passed this on to all of their students.
Orange pill teaches, Orange pill the world.

2026-02-19 03:19:00 UTC

- reply

I don’t understand the narrative that we need big centralised miners.
If nation states start to adopt bitcoin there will be an arms race of hash power to ensure their bitcoin isn’t stolen.
If they don’t but plebs continue to believe in bitcons value proposition there will be thousands of solo miners.
In both scenarios the difficulty adjustment will compensate for the change in hash rate.
Just because a company won’t be able to make money from mining doesn’t mean there will be no mining. There was mining before the big mining companies and I don’t see why there would not be mining if they disappear.

2026-02-19 02:28:44 UTC

- reply

Can you explain to this wine pleb why them thinking it was a Burgandy was a good thing pls ?

2026-02-18 18:26:38 UTC

- reply

Ethnicity ≠ Species

2026-02-14 03:08:18 UTC

- reply

Thanks. I can see the words are English. My comment was intended to draw attention to the fact that while the words are English the language is unintelligible to me.

2026-02-14 02:59:34 UTC

- reply

Can anyone translate this into English for me?

2026-02-13 18:26:32 UTC

- reply

Are you trolling or do you really not understand the difference between what is happening in these two clips?

2026-02-10 09:09:58 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…sfgr had anyone else reported that you can’t remove likes on iOS?

2026-02-10 09:09:01 UTC

- reply

Have you considered that if this information was not available to the public it’s reasonable to assume that Jack didn’t have access to it either.
Guilt by association is not the same thing as being complicit in the acts.
If you did business with someone who later was revealed as a child rapist does that make you also a terrible person.
If, as you are implying, any who has done business with someone named in the Epstein files deserves to be treated in the same way as the people actually named that’s a lot of people. Most of whom probably had no clue.
If Trump is named does that mean that anyone who has ever had business with him is also tainted?
If Larry Fink is named same question?
I don’t know if Jack had prior knowledge and I’m sure you don’t either so let’s not tar him with the same brush simply because he did business with them.

2026-02-07 13:37:24 UTC

- reply

Why is questioning a poorly evidenced argument cope?
I have no horse in this race. It doesn’t impact my life in any way. But if you’re going to claim something is backed by science the least you can do is show up the a complete set of receipts.

2026-02-07 08:36:14 UTC

- reply

There is not enough information in that snippet to draw any conclusions.
How big was the sample size?
Did it control for socioeconomic status before the baby?
Were there comparable groups with none mixed race parents?
As presented this a cherry picking at its finest.

2026-02-06 18:04:06 UTC

- reply

Wouldn’t the conductive spire eventually reach an electrostatic equilibrium with the aether?
If not why not?
By what mechanism does the spire ‘collecting’ the electrical charge cause the mercury to start spinning?
How was the electricity generated from the spinning mercury?
If the spire is ‘collecting’ electrostatic energy why convert that into spinning mercury then back to electricity?

2026-02-06 15:20:27 UTC

- reply

The question is it just lack of knowledge or wilful ignorance?
They love to paint themselves as critical thinkers but are unable to apply basic established knowledge to their line of questioning.

2026-02-06 13:52:23 UTC

- reply

The sun is a fusion reaction
Fusion does not require oxygen

2026-02-06 13:45:39 UTC

- reply

1 - All elements necessary for the combustion are contained within the rocket fuel.
2 - For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
When the fuel combusts it expand rapidly and is forced out of the combustion chamber.
This in turn has an effect equal and opposite effect of propelling the rocket in the opposite direction.

2026-02-04 18:00:09 UTC

- reply

I was not aware all men were attracted to the same things.

2026-02-01 04:11:31 UTC

- reply

TLDR
4. Classical Hinduism (c. 200 BCE–500 CE): cow becomes sacred
By this period:
• Texts like the Dharmashastras explicitly condemn cow slaughter.

2026-02-01 03:53:21 UTC

- reply

I’m not sure coordinated psyops were underway 1500 years ago in India.🤷
👇From Chat GPT
Here is the historically accepted progression:
⸻
1. Early Vedic period (c. 1500–1000 BCE): cows were valued, not forbidden
In the earliest Vedic texts:
• Cows were economically central (milk, butter/ghee, dung for fuel, traction).
• Animal sacrifice did occur, and cattle may occasionally have been eaten, especially in ritual or elite contexts.
• Even then, cows were already symbolically important and associated with wealth and status.
Key point: cows were respected, but not absolutely protected.
⸻
2. Later Vedic → Upanishadic period (c. 1000–500 BCE): shift toward non-violence
Major philosophical changes occurred:
• Growing emphasis on ahimsa (non-violence).
• Ritual sacrifice began to be questioned and symbolised rather than literal.
• Cows increasingly framed as providers rather than consumables.
This period marks the moral turning point.
⸻
3. Influence of Jainism and Buddhism (c. 600–200 BCE)
Two major movements strongly reinforced cow protection:
• Jainism: radical non-violence; killing animals strictly prohibited.
• Buddhism: rejection of ritual animal sacrifice and emphasis on compassion.
Hindu thinkers responded by:
• Absorbing ahimsa into mainstream Hindu ethics.
• Distancing Hindu identity from sacrificial killing.
⸻
4. Classical Hinduism (c. 200 BCE–500 CE): cow becomes sacred
By this period:
• Texts like the Dharmashastras explicitly condemn cow slaughter.
• The cow is framed as “Gau Mata” (Mother Cow).
• Killing a cow is equated with severe moral pollution or sin.
At the same time:
• Dairy (milk, curd, ghee) becomes central to ritual and diet.
• Protecting cows is linked to social order (dharma).
⸻
5. Medieval period (c. 1000–1700 CE): identity marker
During Islamic rule in parts of India:
• Beef consumption by Muslim communities contrasted with Hindu taboos.
• Cow protection became a clear religious boundary marker.
• Hindu rulers often enacted bans on cow slaughter in their territories.
The taboo became socially absolute for most Hindu communities.
⸻
6. Colonial & modern period (1700s–present): politicisation
Under British rule and later:
• Cow protection movements became tied to Hindu nationalism.
• Post-independence India enshrined cow protection in many state laws.
• Today, avoidance of beef is both a religious practice and a cultural-political symbol.