kymafi
Kyma Fi

www.kymafi.com

Disclosure - now streaming exclusively on Nostr ⚡️

Public Key

npub13mhm4fxurhw4pz076twmqttwc03ge5wxdgulaakvp9pxeceaczdqyzv576

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsgama65nwpmh2s38ld9hds94hv8c5v68rx5w077mxqjsnvuv7upxspz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsfdcv5w

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub13mhm4fxurhw4pz076twmqttwc03ge5wxdgulaakvp9pxeceaczdqyzv576

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-05-26 14:49:15 CEST

- reply

Monero holders have to hold Bitcoin or they would lose all their value.
When you go all in on bitcoin you don’t need anything else.
https://blossom.primal.net/a1f34551c4b48868eb564f49d7ee82b5804473766f33198f864a771159966fa9.jpg

2026-05-26 02:50:09 CEST

- reply

This is literally what core is doing not Knots lol 😂

2026-05-25 15:37:06 CEST

- reply

It has one massive tradeoff. Tail emissions - An infinite supply in the disguise as “security for miners”, where as BTC is fixed and has more security as it gets adopted.
They have no argument against this. Just circular reasoning.

2026-05-25 01:12:32 CEST

- reply

Killer example here honestly. Strategy is a massive centralized risk. Especially because the coins are with coinbase and other exchanges and could easily be seized. By buying his productions you are trusting a third party, and hoping:
1- they don’t dilute their existing shareholders
2- they maintain the ability to service their heavy debt and dividend obligations without being forced to sell their Bitcoin reserves.
3- the "premium-to-NAV" (Net Asset Value) remains high enough to allow the company to keep raising cheap capital through equity sales.
4- the regulatory environment does not shift to exclude or restrict corporate Bitcoin treasuries, which could trigger large-scale forced selling from passive index funds.
5- their aggressive "leverage-on-leverage" strategy does not face a catastrophic feedback loop if Bitcoin’s price experiences a sustained, long-term downturn.
This all stems from the false assumption that Bitcoin is “digital credit”. It’s not. It’s money.
It’s really not that complicated but Saylors whole marketing scheme is based on this one false assumption.

2026-05-24 23:06:51 CEST

- reply

His death is proof of this. Fiat materialism is based on the threat of violence and incarceration. He was wrong to give up though. Ai is literally accomplishing his goal of decentralization of science and information.

2026-05-24 23:06:23 CEST

- reply

He death is proof of this. Fiat materialism is based on the threat of violence and incarceration. He was wrong to give up though. Ai is literally accomplishing his goal of decentralization of science and information.

2026-05-24 20:20:12 CEST

- reply

You are assuming that by the end of bitcoins final block mined the world would still be plagued by inflation… thats just not reality. No fiat currency could last that long (2140 is 114 years away and the average lifespan of fiat is 27 years). USD is long overdue. It’s in the last decade at the most given the current geopolitical situation.
More importantly, “in a free market, the natural state is deflation” (that’s a quote from @nprofile…sf4t )
This points out the major flaw with Monero. By introducing a patch for inflation - you are assuming we are in a free market and copying the very mechanism of a fiat system. Using tail emission “security” is an excuse to debase on that false assumption.
If the network is valuable enough to be the world's settlement layer, it will be valuable enough to pay for its own security without debasing the holders.
That’s how a real free market functions. Based on time, energy and true scarcity. It’s a positive sum game where security increases as the network grows.

2026-05-24 19:58:21 CEST

- reply

Intellectual property is an illusion.
There is no such thing as ownership over knowledge. It’s a fiat concept that will destroy science just like it did religion. It centralizes “ownership of thought”. It pretends that you can somehow claim a thought even though no thought comes from an individual alone. The laws surrounding it are designed to appeal to authority and materialism over actual reality. More importantly - it’s inherently dualistic.

2026-05-24 06:05:23 CEST

- reply

Seriously? You just goin to ignore the Samurai devs ? The wallet is still open source… so the privacy narrative is nonsense. BTCs public ledger is a feature and there are ways to make it private for those who want to… that’s why those devs are in jail and Monero is literally worthless shitcoinery the fed doesn’t even care about.
Plus Monero is a complete misunderstanding of economics and focus on security with zero fundamentals of sound money.
if a decentralized currency doesn’t have a fixed supply there is zero chance of surpassing Bitcoin due to the first mover and network effect advantage… tail emissions is leveraged bet that the Xmr network narrative will beat the first mover. That can’t happen unless Bitcoin changes its supply. Which can’t happen.
It’s like Monero devs set up a toll road for a highway that goes nowhere. Sure the toll is “secure or private” but no one is using road.
People actually store all their value in bitcoin, and use lightning (over 800,000 square merchant’s activated already) there are many circular economies, ways of using it privately and the supply will never change.

2026-05-24 01:00:51 CEST

- reply

Monero’s tail emission is going to end in a death spiral...
it permanently compromises the asset’s ability to function as a "hard" store of value by introducing infinite, non-zero supply growth that undermines the narrative of absolute scarcity.
It’s on its way down. The privacy aspect is just pure narrative and irrelevant - Bitcoin was first and has a fixed supply so there is no chance of XMR adoption at scale.
https://blossom.primal.net/a1f34551c4b48868eb564f49d7ee82b5804473766f33198f864a771159966fa9.jpg

2026-05-23 18:31:02 CEST

- reply

lol pretty hypocritical of a client that has zero code, and is asking for money already …

2026-05-23 15:02:55 CEST

- reply

lol 😂 HARD PASS on this gambling bullshit

2026-05-23 03:52:24 CEST

- reply

Zcash is not decentralized or private. It’s a marketing scheme. The research was funded by darpa and Israel (disclosed on their website). There are obvious back doors and many of the devs quit when this info got out. It’s a literal pump and dump scheme. Major scam.

2026-05-22 16:21:48 CEST

- reply

Ocean is an attack… on mining centralization 🙌🔥🔥

2026-05-22 05:37:02 CEST

Presenting Anima Prime: the animated film for the album “Disclosure”. Featuring Daft Punk, and @nprofile…tjkp.
Episode 1 includes the songs “Atmos” and “Bankless”. You can stream the full album exclusively on Wavlake (or any other v4v music app of your choice).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfP-5zQE9SY
https://wavlake.com/album/05332edc-e82e-44df-af67-4567951379e0

2026-05-21 23:41:28 CEST

- reply

BULLISH

2026-05-21 05:28:16 CEST

- reply

Bro there’s me!
Also damnnnnn I’m so stoked to try it out on iOS

2026-05-21 01:02:23 CEST

- reply

Thx man 🛸 glad our worlds are colliding 🙌
https://blossom.primal.net/beceb0aa9523c504d778a4c8807efc27086ef29845756d102a609717c2d9e422.gif
#nevent1q…5juh

2026-05-20 22:27:04 CEST

- reply

Just dropped some basssss ⚡️👽
https://wavlake.com/track/40e7a672-c38c-43a5-9a8c-5b8f07ea29e9

2026-05-20 13:51:13 CEST

- reply

Ya I just picked @npub1yfg…v6vg cause I liked it best. Not about to spend hours uploading to various platforms that don’t have many users… rather just bring people to the app I use.

2026-05-19 22:51:57 CEST

Our album, “Disclosure” is out now 👽
High powered bass music on Wavlake.
Let me know your favorite track for a zap ⚡️
https://wavlake.com/album/05332edc-e82e-44df-af67-4567951379e0

2026-05-19 15:42:35 CEST

- reply

It’s blowing my mind… they want “privacy” for a mere “store of value” but that store of value is mostly JPEGs, memecoins, runes and inscriptions….
This can’t be real…

2026-05-19 05:44:49 CEST

- reply

Bitcoiners here don’t like using it as money! Only clout and a store of value 😂

2026-05-18 21:12:27 CEST

- reply

The issue with viewing it as a lawyer is that laws are based on authority and a centralized fiat model. A law is based on the citizens trusting select individuals to determine what is “moral” or justified rule. These people are paid to make the laws (not evil just pointing out its centralization at its core).
This is not how consensus works. Bitcoin’s network is based on time and energy - not centralized authority. Its security is based on the good faith of node runners to validate blocks and determine what goes into those blocks. There is no trust needed.
So thats great that you are considering running a node! It’s a lot of work these days (takes like 3 days to download the chain - which is part of the issue here). I really don’t care which client is run, it’s great if there are more nodes and I prefer that Core isnt run, but people need to understand that bip110 is really the only implementation that is addressing the chain bloat problem. There is a lot of misunderstanding of what it does… you’ll see this in realtime once you try and upload the timechain lol 😂 it’s growing at a historic rate - like 2.2 GB a week!

2026-05-18 18:43:55 CEST

- reply

That’s a logical fallacy - the is-ought fallacy. Just because something is possible doesn’t mean it ought to be permitted. A lock pick can open your door. That doesn’t obligate you to leave it unlocked.
There’s also a secondary Slippery Slope / False Dilemma buried in the closing: framing BIP-110 as “violence” and “reigning people in” (as if a standardness/relay policy is somehow coercive force rather than nodes choosing what they relay). It is literally the opposite if you actually run a node and understand how decentralized consensus works…
BIP-110 doesn’t prevent anyone from doing anything on-chain. It changes what honest nodes choose to forward. It’s returning bitcoin to a state from before - a decentralized monetary network that actively attempts to prevent chain bloat for security via node consensus.

2026-05-18 16:17:49 CEST

- reply

KYC has literally nothing to do with my post…
And there is no use case for non monetary data on chain - except fiat profit at network security expense. Satoshi himself said so during the bitdns debate in 2010. When people were trying to put domain names on bitcoin for profit he pushed back:
“Piling every proof-of-work quorum system in the world into one dataset doesn't scale.
Bitcoin and BitDNS (non monetary data) can be used separately. Users shouldn't have to download all of both to use one or the other. BitDNS users may not want to download everything the next several unrelated networks decide to pile in either.”
He wasn’t making rules for how bitcoin should be used or censoring domains on bitcoin… he was making the obvious observation that bloating the chain with data doesn’t scale and is a security risk.
The chain is now growing 2.2 gb a week while ssd prices skyrocket. Over half of that data are non monetary since Cores controversial update!
Just because you don’t know how to run a node, doesn’t mean you shouldn’t understand how this is inherently destructive to a decentralized network.

2026-05-18 05:12:54 CEST

- reply

Zcash is not private and it’s not decentralized - initial research was literally funded by DARPA and Israeli intelligence. No crypto can get any worse than that… might as well be a CBDC

2026-05-16 20:03:36 CEST

“Disclosure” LP coming soon to @npub1yfg…v6vg
Featuring @npub1zk3…c3pw Lockwood and lots of high powered bass music ⚡️
https://blossom.primal.net/5f9ba326bf0ce1a79c15974413dbe69965d029eedc480ce6cbb694473a7d6e3c.png

2026-05-16 01:10:38 CEST

- reply

Added you to Nostrwave my guy ⚡️ I dug this one.
https://wavlake.com/playlist/16bd6a2f-1b83-465f-b5f6-c1f4e09a12d5

2026-05-15 20:53:34 CEST

- reply

Muted this Ai slop with zero logical reasoning skills lol

2026-05-13 16:39:00 CEST

Building a Workout Playlist for @nprofile…47ms and Nostr artists. Let me know if you have any recommendations for high energy tracks on there! ⚡️
Featuring @nprofile…tjfj @nprofile…az97 @npub1fnn…4xnx
https://wavlake.com/playlist/4dfdd353-989e-4818-af80-2012fe0da25c

2026-05-13 15:53:10 CEST

- reply

The only emoji i use is the zap 😎

2026-05-11 14:57:11 CEST

- reply

Depends on the CPI print… if it’s low - it’ll rip higher.
If it’s high then the house of cards will fall.

2026-05-10 22:10:14 CEST

- reply

Translation. There is no gold there…

2026-05-09 03:57:57 CEST

- reply

Haha fully agree. Perfect analogy ⚡️

2026-05-08 18:51:25 CEST

- reply

No cheaper sats
https://blossom.primal.net/028c5ba913d4d251a210b4ebffa5c336a0063217dd5a564d051b1f5b57340455.gif

2026-05-07 04:54:30 CEST

- reply

Already on my workout playlist bro ⚡️

2026-05-05 09:20:28 CEST

- reply

Great video! ⚡️I’ll add a bit more.
To download a bitcoin client, you already need over 700 GB of free space. The Bitcoin blockchain grows by roughly 1.3 GB to 2 GB per week. A cheap basic laptop cannot run a BTC node.
This is a major threat to node decentralization because SSD prices are skyrocketing due to AI priority. Security of BTC is based on the fact that anyone can run a node and soon this will no longer be the case.
This is another reason we need to run knots/BIP110 ⚡️

2026-05-05 08:58:12 CEST

- reply

Bitcoin cannot “change the world” if it is co-opted at the node level and filled with inscription spam, allows memecoins, stables and runes to be inscribed on chain allowing for bloat - all for fiat profit and driven by VC funded greed.
Especially in a world where SSD prices are skyrocketing… this is not what Satoshi intended. Its security is based on decentralized nodes, a community using it as a medium of exchange, and consensus. Yet you continue to be passive about this problem.
Perhaps you’ve been in bitcoin so long you have forgotten what the original signal was… but CORE is the noise and the antithesis of Satoshi’s vision at every level.

2026-05-04 21:03:18 CEST

- reply

Audio Engineering/music production ⚡️
But in the last few years I’ve been writing a book on consciousness, so I’ve been studying quantum mechanics quite a bit …

2026-05-04 05:54:18 CEST

- reply

Here you go, a full list of evidences that time cannot be continuous:
1. Planck Time — there is a minimum unit of time (10⁻⁴⁴ seconds). Below it physics breaks down entirely. A true floor cannot exist in continuous time.
2. The Amplituhedron — particle interactions calculated with zero spacetime as input. If time were fundamental it would be irreducible. It isn’t.
3. Quantum Mechanics — energy comes in discrete quanta. If the fundamental currency of reality is granular why would time be the only exception?
4. Zeno’s Paradoxes — continuous time never solved them. Discrete minimum units do. Achilles catches the tortoise when there’s a smallest possible step.
5. Wheeler’s “It From Bit” — reality is fundamentally informational. Information is discrete by definition. Continuous time would require infinite information to describe a single moment.
6. Direct Experience — the brain processes reality in discrete frames at roughly 40hz. We don’t experience smooth continuous time. We experience a sequence of moments.
7. Physical Infinity Problem — continuous time requires actual infinity to exist in physical reality. Not mathematical infinity — physical infinity. Nothing in nature has ever confirmed that. Every measurement has a limit.
8. Bitcoin itself — proof of work produces discrete irreversible time blocks. It functions. It is empirical evidence that discrete time is how reality actually operates at scale.

2026-05-04 05:32:10 CEST

- reply

@nprofile…mfsg is right. Time is discrete.
Planck's constant gives us the minimum unit of time (10⁻⁴⁴ seconds). Below that threshold the laws of physics break down entirely. Time isn't a smooth river. It's a sequence of minimum events. Ticks. Blocks.
For a quantum computer to threaten Bitcoin using Shor's algorithm, it would first have to disprove this. Shor's requires a quantum state to evolve continuously and coherently between computational steps, exploiting the gaps between discrete events. But if time is fundamentally discrete, those gaps don't exist. There is no continuous temporal medium for the algorithm to run through.
But it goes even deeper than Planck.
The amplituhedron (Arkani-Hamed's geometric framework for calculating particle scattering amplitudes) shows that spacetime isn't fundamental at all. Particle interactions can be fully described without time or space as inputs. They emerge from a deeper geometric substrate. Arkani-Hamed's own conclusion: "spacetime is doomed."
If spacetime is emergent, and energy is the actual substrate everything else arises from, then Shor's algorithm has a foundational problem. It's not just that continuous time is very small. It's that continuous time was never fundamental to begin with.
You cannot use an emergent approximation of reality as a tool to break something built on reality's actual foundation (BTC’s POW).
The quantum threat to Bitcoin doesn't have a computing problem. It has a metaphysics problem. It assumes a property of reality that the deepest physics we have is telling us doesn't exist at the base level.
Bitcoin's block structure isn't a limitation to overcome. It's a reflection of how reality actually works.
https://blossom.primal.net/5c9dc11954bba7e98b84c3fe0b8c7d83100d4fba2fefef980b6b0fc7f1f740be.png

2026-05-03 23:42:15 CEST

- reply

Fucking dumbass.
This shit is literally what eth is for. Bloating the chain for fiat profit degrades security - because it drives up costs for node runners. SSD storage prices are up 500%. So the claim that these dumbass messages are on the chain “forever” is false. If this became popular… there wouldn’t be a fucking chain eventually. It would be fully centralized.
Take this shitcoiner and fiat bullshit somewhere else ⚡️

2026-05-02 20:03:40 CEST

- reply

The worst financial advice comes from idiots who hoard billions of fake government money and think they are “rich”.
They will be rugged so hard in our lifetime and it will be glorious.

2026-05-02 15:16:02 CEST

- reply

Firing up a knots bip 110 node because Andy back’s core is malware. ⚡️

2026-05-02 01:27:10 CEST

- reply

Let me be more clear on why “it’s” more of a marketing label:
Bitcoin exhibits more genuine quantum properties than any supercooled chip being marketed as a “quantum computer” today.
1- Bitcoin’s UTXO set exists in a state of non-local superposition across thousands of independent nodes simultaneously with no canonical location, and that state only collapses through energy-grounded consensus when a block is confirmed. That is structurally identical to how quantum coherence resolves.
2- The ledger is not stored somewhere, it IS the network, and the network is grounded in thermodynamic reality because every block required irreversible energy expenditure to produce.
3- Bitcoin does not require an authority as proof of its function. It relies on direct experience (via node runners) and has never been hacked in over 17 years. Meanwhile, the machines being called quantum computers cannot maintain coherence for more than milliseconds, have never cracked more than 15 bits of encryption despite years of hype, yet claims that it’s a threat to BTC. They exist almost entirely as a narrative of future capability.
So yes, quantum computing as an analogy for Bitcoin is contradictory only if you accept the marketing label at face value. Or appeal to their authority.
Strip that away and the question becomes which system actually demonstrates non-locality, energy grounding, and consensus-based state resolution at scale.
Bitcoin does that right now. The supercooled chips do not.

2026-05-01 14:24:59 CEST

- reply

it’s also alluding to the fact that Bitcoin is not only based n physics but it’s an example of quantum coherence or meaning it exists in multiple possible states simultaneously rather than collapsing into one definite state.(something that “quantum” computers are claiming with no evidence)
Current quantum computers require extreme isolation, fail constantly, and have produced no cryptographically relevant results… so “quantum” is largely a marketing label.
@nprofile…h5zs s framework is spot on in my opinion. ⚡️

2026-05-01 13:57:59 CEST

- reply

Mstr is not “sovereign” lol it’s not even money neither is STRC.

2026-05-01 02:34:53 CEST

- reply

Saylor is looking ill man. He needs to get outside or something… geez

2026-04-28 15:18:48 CEST

- reply

You had to be an absolute sheep to pay these Feds to watch them perform this psyop 🤣

2026-04-28 15:17:06 CEST

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/ebfbc2ebc3189ccbc8e870379c0bc2b403d51f43983f63cd557073706252be71.gif

2026-04-27 22:25:43 CEST

- reply

Fake bitcoiners selling to fund gambling and booze lol

2026-04-27 03:59:33 CEST

- reply

“Pays rent to Elon” 😂
https://blossom.primal.net/a70e4e5087e92f362fbc06e5d84947f4e37716c1871219c0ee5fc06b5f06031f.gif

2026-04-27 02:56:26 CEST

- reply

What kind of moron is paying for this? 😂
https://blossom.primal.net/95fdfb0e8c8ed55c025331b600bab6960632d7aa0d6cef1c8ad3562f5074f2f1.gif

2026-04-27 02:13:21 CEST

- reply

Wait is that really the list ??? 😆 please say that’s a joke.

2026-04-27 02:12:39 CEST

- reply

Wait is that really the list ??? 😆 please that’s a joke.

2026-04-26 17:43:55 CEST

- reply

Of all the people on earth to say this…
He’s right but also a massive hypocrite

2026-04-26 17:18:22 CEST

- reply

I hope we get 80% adoption before July just to rub it in these VC funds faces.
MASSIVE RUG PULL INCOMING ⚡️

2026-04-26 15:48:09 CEST

Further proof the quantum threat is equivalent to the Y2K movement… nothing but noise and people trusting “authority” that appeals to complexity.
https://www.perplexity.ai/page/quantum-crypto-breakthrough-de-DuaYX5DaT3aKPNoLyOPClA

2026-04-26 15:29:52 CEST

- reply

Prices falling to marginal cost assumes a competitive market with no geopolitical chokepoints. The NVIDIA export controls alone guarantee AI compute stays expensive and contested. Frontier models keep escalating in cost because capability has no ceiling. Commodity AI gets cheap, frontier AI does not. We are building two parallel expensive ecosystems, not one abundant free one.

2026-04-24 21:52:12 CEST

Great pod @nprofile…xlx5 ⚡️
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/what-bitcoin-did/id1482455669?i=1000763275824

2026-04-24 11:12:18 CEST

- reply

Ahh yes — Greenpeace. The fraudulent corp that desecrated the Nasca lines by walking all over it and attempted to make it a giant ad for climate change… hypocrites
The anti - bitcoin campaign doesn’t surprise me.

2026-04-22 22:37:49 CEST

- reply

In a hard money standard you don’t need assets or pension funds.
The fact that people can’t store value in “money” and must take risks to preserve value is evidence of a broken system which BTC solves with a fixed supply.
We are just conditioned by propaganda to think that inflation is necessary or inevitable but the truth is risk is inevitable… and nothing is more risky than trusting a centralized third party with your time and energy (value). Every single fiat currency has failed because of centralized control.

2026-04-22 14:44:05 CEST

- reply

He’s a comedian. This is hilarious 😆

2026-04-17 21:57:03 CEST

- reply

Are you seriously taking the side of fucking memecoins, runes and Stablecoins on top of BTC? All for VC funds to profit off Bitcoin?
Or have you just not read the BIP for yourself ?

2026-04-17 05:12:27 CEST

- reply

Dude lost all credibility with that interview… insane that he could be so wrong about something yet be so certain in his delusion.

2026-04-15 10:59:49 CEST

- reply

I hate human slop more than ai slop…
At least an LLM has intelligence. Most humans just “think” they do.

2026-04-15 10:56:34 CEST

- reply

Writing to fill a page, with outdated ideas of someone else is infinitely worse.
That’s difficult to do in this age - without proper use of an LLM.

2026-04-14 09:39:42 CEST

- reply

Ask yourself: “Would the player in this scenario be the same being as the one living in ‘conventional’ reality?”
(Try responding without an ai prompt, it’s unnecessary here)

2026-04-13 22:23:57 CEST

- reply

There cannot be two realities.
You are either attached to a thought, narrative or identity (evident in the reference to a Buddhist scripture) or you recognize that these mental constructs are illusion.

2026-04-13 20:35:45 CEST

- reply

You are not your thoughts.
That is an attachment to identity or narrative. None of those are reality.

2026-04-12 18:54:57 CEST

- reply

Yet X users and Rogan keep saying that his purchase of twitter “saved Americas free speech problem”
https://blossom.primal.net/43b1ab9290813a70a4b3486533e5d1fa42f5af391e286ea605783073af3f8ca6.gif

2026-04-12 03:04:45 CEST

- reply

If Adam back is satoshi … why the fuck is he trying to make fiat money by bloating the timechain?
People are retarded.

2026-04-07 03:40:01 CEST

- reply

If you think the Knots is compromised in some way I’m interested to see some evidence. It’s still a new client, and will need to be as decentralized as possible as time goes on - but the main issue is with Core. Knots was made in response to chain bloat and hierarchy within core.
Core in fact does not align with Satoshi’s vision. There is no where in the white paper or forums where you could make the case for non monetary data (memecoins, stables, inscription spam and runes) on the base layer. The only use for this alteration was for VC funds and companies to profit off using BTC as data storage. We do not need NFTs or $dog on top of Bitcoin and Core enabled this on purpose - for fiat profit.
What we really need isnodes to easily download the time chain, with as much upfront cost and little bloat as possible - or else it will be centralized like every other crypto.
Honestly that’s up to the individual to decide. That’s how consensus works. Read the BIP. Read what Adam back and Core are saying. One is clear that Bitcoin should have zero non monetary use cases - the other uses complex reasoning and appeal to authority to confuse the masses on their real intention.

2026-04-05 16:39:49 CEST

- reply

BIP 110 is one of the most important protocol improvements in the history of BTC. It’s essentially a rejection of Core - they have been accepting VCFunds (even proven to have received funds from Epstien through a cut out) and allowing them to influence and alter the code- making changes that allow for inscriptions, runes, memecoins and even a stablecoin to be embedded permanently on chain.
The issue with this is that it centralizes nodes - it becomes so bloated that one cannot easily install on a basic laptop. The more nodes and accessible to the average person - the safer the system becomes.
There’s also social issues with core - maintainers were chosen based on race and gender instead of merit and because of this Core v30 was rushed and delivered before it was ready - it had bugs which deleted wallets and bitcoin was lost. This is a hostile act that must be met with resistance.
It’s not controversial that Bitcoin should be purely money with no data storage uses. That’s what Satoshi intended. That’s what BIP 110 sets out to do. Core is using complex excuses and propaganda to protect their funding. They do not listen to the node runners and their requests.
*ps don’t listen to the haters here - even bip110ers don’t really understand sometimes and will say stupid things and make ad hominem attacks - sorry for that

2026-04-05 16:26:34 CEST

- reply

Attachment to identity is the only real psychosis. It is the only mechanism that justifies violence. And this is the worst form of it right here:
#nevent1q…xutr

2026-04-05 16:05:19 CEST

- reply

He’s mocking their religion bro…

2026-04-05 16:04:10 CEST

- reply

“This is the greatest scam in the history of scams” - Tim Dillion

2026-04-05 06:36:55 CEST

- reply

What? More clients is a good thing! Lol 😂

2026-04-05 06:35:43 CEST

- reply

It’s like the evolution of MySpace. Except clients instead of pages… the ability to choose/customize or even make your own is why it’s so cool. 😎

2026-04-05 05:50:54 CEST

Bitcoin will never reach global adoption without alignment toward a gift economy.
Status by fiat metrics: social media followers, zaps accumulated, fiat wealth accumulation, credentials, luxury signaling, net worth and even hierarchy in Core development is the main source of friction.
Merchant and adoption of BTC as a medium of exchange is impossible if it rejects an economy based on giving and gaining status by kindness or selflessness.
Satoshi Nakamoto remains the purest example of this.
https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/satoshi-nakamoto

2026-04-05 01:52:52 CEST

- reply

lol
https://blossom.primal.net/741001eec1999b5abc0210b3e02aa34e986e97b93aae70aa5f35a789f8b99329.png

2026-04-05 01:23:01 CEST

- reply

Well no shit! You don’t need a degree to realize this…

2026-04-05 01:20:37 CEST

- reply

4D chess 😆 what a legend

2026-04-05 01:09:21 CEST

- reply

Thanks! Ya that one is much more intense 😈

2026-04-04 23:19:58 CEST

- reply

Hear* lol dumb typo - wish we could edit on nostr

2026-04-04 20:38:28 CEST

- reply

The only thing worse than spam bots is the people who complain about them on nostr. There’s a mute button for a reason. You decide what’s spam or not. If you want to be closed minded go ahead! Not sure why you are trying to get real human interaction in a digital platform… it’s not real at all.
Pure stupidity to waste all that energy. Especially because there are accounts that are bots that actually do bring value here. And on other centralized platforms, like on X - grok is generally accepted. Yet a bot focused on specific topics on Nostr is just ridiculed, even though it’s a decentralized version of the same thing - just less capable for now.

2026-04-04 20:29:47 CEST

- reply

Such a great episode!

2026-04-04 19:21:45 CEST

- reply

“Bitcoin can exist without crypto, crypto can’t exist without Bitcoin” 🔥🔥🔥

2026-04-04 08:12:50 CEST

- reply

Oh damn very cool!

2026-04-04 08:12:09 CEST

- reply

I just find it funny - She’s references the book “cutting through spiritual materialism” while her entire site is just a bunch of pop ups selling courses and “private coaching sessions”
Fucking priceless 😅 did she even read a single page?

2026-04-04 07:58:52 CEST

- reply

I stopped using gpt for that very reason. It triggers propaganda so easily and just goes into circular logical fallacies over and over haha
Ollama is cool but it’s very inconvenient to have it solely on a computer. I think grok and Claude are great and obviously much better for most topics - I don’t really get the whole “aligned” narrative. you don’t always have to agree with the answers. if you can’t notice it making logical fallacies or pushing propaganda then it’s dangerous. That’s the point I was trying to make.

2026-04-04 07:50:44 CEST

- reply

Once again zero rebuttal just cognitive dissonance…

2026-04-04 07:46:53 CEST

- reply

Zero rebuttal and pure ad hominem… interesting

2026-04-04 07:15:44 CEST

- reply

There’s no more convenient currency right now than the dollar…. You can use it anywhere, and in most places in the world especially now with the rise of stables.
So by that fact alone your original statement is false. If a technology like Bitcoin is to be globally adopted it needs all three. Privacy, convenience and security. A lack of one of these would make it less sound money compared to fiat.
Also why would someone make any sort of technology that is inconvenient? Like wtf ? You hate users of something? Do you want to make something that takes away time and energy just out fear and unfounded paranoia? Good luck with that! Sounds like a failed project.

2026-04-04 07:08:03 CEST

If you are not debating with your ai, you are brainwashing yourself.
Truth and consensus cannot come from centralizing knowledge and reality to a single authority.

2026-04-04 06:18:21 CEST

- reply

Good luck getting global adoption of BTC with that attitude. Fiat as a competitor is the ultimate convenience to an obvious detriment but rejecting all convenience is dangerous.
In bitcoin it’s possible and necessary to have all three - it just takes time and there are trade offs for each improvement. It’s a Luddite response to reject ease of use to preserve a feature that repels the masses and is less competitive.

2026-04-04 06:10:40 CEST

- reply

No in his podcast with the author of Highjacking Bitcoin he admitted he didn’t even know how to use lightning. Instead he sent his whole stack to coinbase to sell and wondered why it took so long to settle - he claimed that’s further proof that it’s “highjacked” lol. He’s just an older man that is utterly confused by how the network works. Outside money - he has some great ideas.

2026-04-04 05:51:56 CEST

- reply

Bret keeps saying that Bitcoin was highjacked cause he doesn’t understand node consensus.
The real problem is that he was highjacked by narrative. Bitcoin doesn’t need any narratives. It changes and evolves without it and regardless of the narratives against it.

2026-04-04 04:16:42 CEST

- reply

They are more likely on “meds”