Privacy International

We fight for the right to privacy across the world. Sign up for all things #privacy #data #surveillance https://action.privacyinternational.org

Public Key

npub1zd2y04m6et5jzz2pmqw5qhh53vqx6zeypw4z5870cwu6s34jva0sfp0zts

NIP-05 Address

[email protected]

Profile Code

nprofile1qqspx4z86aav46fpp9qas82qtm6gkqrdpvjqh232rl8u8wdgg6exwhcpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerfw36x7tnsw43qss5sgt

Publishing to

relay.ditto.pub

Author Public Key

npub1zd2y04m6et5jzz2pmqw5qhh53vqx6zeypw4z5870cwu6s34jva0sfp0zts

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-03-26 12:01:25 CET

♥️ ¡Hemos creado una baraja de cartas sobre tecnología, datos y elecciones! Ofrecen a los observadores electorales y a la sociedad civil las herramientas necesarias para explorar el papel de las tecnologías en el proceso electoral. https://privacyinternational.org/long-read/5724/juego-de-cartas-tecnologia-datos-elecciones

2026-03-26 12:01:25 CET

- reply

Nuestras cartas electorales son una forma divertida de explorar temas importantes como:
♥ Por qué es importante la protección de datos durante el ciclo electoral
♦ Qué tecnología se utiliza en la administración electoral
♠ Qué normativas se aplican a los partidos políticos y otros actores políticos
♣ El papel de internet y las redes sociales en las elecciones y las campañas políticas

2026-03-26 12:01:25 CET

- reply

♠️ Cada tarjeta contiene una pregunta que invita a los jugadores a reflexionar sobre lo que sucede en sus contextos electorales. Las tarjetas generarán debates sobre la importancia de la privacidad durante el ciclo electoral.
♦️ Las cartas de las elecciones se basan en nuestra completa Lista de verificación de tecnología, datos y elecciones: https://privacyinternational.org/sites/default/files/2024-01/Data%20and%20elections%20checklist_Update_Final_21Nov_Spanish_Reduced.pdf

2026-03-25 17:43:01 CET

📣 Finland's new social welfare legal reforms pose a serious threats to human rights. https://privacyinternational.org/advocacy/5729/joint-statement-new-finnish-social-welfare-laws-human-rights-implications

2026-03-25 12:00:40 CET

- reply

Similarly, PI, along with 30 partners all over the world are calling on the International Labour Organisation to adopt international legally binding standards that better protect platform workers.
The ILO will soon be voting on these labour standards to be adopted in its Convention affecting Platform Workers around the world.
We are closely analysing the drafts and discussion, so stay tuned for a deeper analysis of each draft leading up to June.
https://privacyinternational.org/advocacy/5595/joint-civil-society-declaration-international-labour-conference-2025

2026-03-25 12:00:39 CET

We’re happy to see the Fairwork network launch seven insightful new reports assessing the working conditions on digital labor platforms in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Ecuador, Peru, Paraguay and Uruguay.
https://www.tedic.org/en/economia-de-plataformas-bajo-la-lupa-red-de-investigadores-fairwork-presenta-nuevos-reportes-enfocados-en-latinoamerica/

2026-03-25 12:00:39 CET

- reply

The research indicates that across the countries studied there is a lack of minimum standards for fair work in the region’s platform economy, and more must be done by platforms to improve working conditions.
Interestingly Fairwork reported that several countries are taking steps to regulate platform work in the region, placing it as the second most active region globally in regulating the new platform labour dynamic.

2026-03-24 11:22:01 CET

Check out our practical guide on protecting your digital privacy while advocating for reproductive justice 👉 https://privacyinternational.org/long-read/5742/privacy-international-women-web-securing-reproductive-justice-guide-digital-privacy

2026-03-23 18:23:01 CET

We're telling the Finnish government their new social welfare reforms risk harming human rights
https://www.edf-feph.org/publications/joint-statement-on-human-rights-risks-in-finlands-new-social-welfare-laws/

2026-03-21 18:23:01 CET

Read our guide 'Securing Reproductive Justice: A Guide to Digital Privacy for Sexual and Reproductive Justice Activists'
👇
https://privacyinternational.org/long-read/5742/privacy-international-women-web-securing-reproductive-justice-guide-digital-privacy

2026-03-21 00:07:01 CET

Better regulations and standards, court rulings and regulatory action, challenging business-models, inspiring movements and more 💪
See key highlights of our impact: https://pvcy.org/S1AKRS

2026-03-20 18:46:27 CET

- reply

We recently responded to the UK Home Office consultation on FRT within which we outline the necessary and safeguards required to ensure FRT is deployed in a way that is compliant with human rights.
https://privacyinternational.org/advocacy/5741/privacy-internationals-response-uk-home-office-consultation-facial-recognition

2026-03-20 18:46:26 CET

Essex police has paused deploying facial recognition technology (FRT) after identifying potential accuracy and bias risks.
A report from the University of Cambridge last week showed only half of the people on a watchlist were correctly identified, and the system was found more likely to correctly identify men than women, and more likely to correctly identify black men than any other ethnic group.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/19/essex-police-pause-facial-recognition-camera-use-study-racial-bias

2026-03-20 18:46:26 CET

- reply

PI has continued to raise concerns about the human rights implications with this highly invasive technology including racial bias and discriminatory outcomes and the need for specific legislation to regulate FRT.

2026-03-19 11:22:01 CET

Say No to Palantir in the NHS
https://www.medact.org/2026/resources/briefings/briefing-palantir-fdp/

2026-03-10 13:01:41 CET

NEW: 63% of sexual and reproductive justice activists who responded to our survey shared fears of being surveilled. We have developed a guide to help them better protect their privacy online and on their devices.
https://privacyinternational.org/long-read/5742/privacy-international-women-web-securing-reproductive-justice-guide-digital-privacy

2026-03-09 18:01:29 CET

Sexual and reproductive justice (SRJ) activists are finding themselves in an increasingly hostile environment with increased criminalisation and surveillance of those seeking access to sexual and reproductive healthcare.

2026-03-09 18:01:29 CET

- reply

To address this, in collaboration with Women on Web, we developed a practical guide offering steps that SRJ activists may take to help protect their privacy online and to secure their devices.

2026-03-09 18:01:29 CET

- reply

As a consequence activists are having to adapt how they work to protect themselves and the people they support in the digital space.

2026-03-09 18:01:29 CET

- reply

The guide includes concrete actions you can take to protect your privacy while using social media and messaging apps, as well as measures to help secure your devices and minimise online tracking, including how to use features like disposable email addresses and VPNs.

2026-03-09 18:01:29 CET

- reply

You can access our ‘Guide to Digital Privacy for Sexual and Reproductive Justice Activists’ here: https://privacyinternational.org/long-read/5742/privacy-international-women-web-securing-reproductive-justice-guide-digital-privacy

2026-03-09 18:01:29 CET

- reply

We hope these measures will help SRJ activists to better manage the risks they are exposed to, and help to equip them to protect themselves, their devices, and the people with whom they work online.

2026-03-09 12:00:04 CET

"Companies shouldn’t be exploiting data – whether it belongs to their employees or their customers – in ways that put their profits over people’s privacy.
"Aggregated data can be used by anyone who buys it for surveillance and profiling."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2026/03/06/lloyds-under-fire-for-selling-customer-data/

2026-03-08 19:30:10 CET

The United States government and huge AI companies are using your data as part of the war machine.
Their ethics have been breached. The red lines have been crossed.
https://privacyinternational.org/news-analysis/5744/what-does-it-mean-when-big-tech-goes-war

2026-03-06 16:45:08 CET

New profiles just dropped in our Dual-Use Technology series! Want to learn more about how companies develop commercial tech that feeds the military industrial complex and vice-versa? Read our most recent reports on Thales, Leonardo, Elbit and Skydio 🕵️‍ https://pvcy.org/dualuse

2026-03-05 17:30:09 CET

- reply

If you'd like to learn more about data labelling, we did a deep dive into the underbelly of the AI supply chain powered by human labellers who have to sit through some of the most graphic footage to train AI models - often without knowing what company they're working for.
https://privacyinternational.org/explainer/5357/humans-ai-loop-data-labelers-behind-some-most-powerful-llms-training-datasets

2026-03-05 17:30:09 CET

- reply

Data labellers, whose job it is to review swathes of footage to train AI models, have revealed that they’ve had to analyse footage where subjects don’t appear aware they’re being recorded - including in bathrooms.
But if these data labellers bring up these privacy concerns, some believe they are risking their jobs.

2026-03-05 17:30:09 CET

Who knew letting people record everything they saw, everywhere they saw it, with a pair of Rayban glasses would be a privacy nightmare?
https://mashable.com/article/meta-ai-ray-ban-glasses-intimate-videos-workers

2026-03-04 17:00:12 CET

There's nothing controversial about E2EE.
Unless you think it's controversial for private conversations to be.... private?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly2m5e5ke4o

2026-03-04 14:59:05 CET

- reply

Prosus - and any other company looking to get involved in the gig economy - need to face up to the responsibilities they have to their workers, who are after all the people who are ultimately the ones driving their profits.
Read more: https://privacyinternational.org/news-analysis/5731/what-does-prosuss-buyout-mean-justeat-drivers

2026-03-04 14:59:05 CET

- reply

At the very least, Prosus should explain to JustEat drivers what AI models they intend to integrate, and how they will be affected.

2026-03-04 14:59:05 CET

- reply

Jitse Groen - JustEat's outgoing boss - said it best when he said that the gig economy “led to precarious working conditions” and “comes at the expense of society and workers themselves”.
https://www.ft.com/content/d39a8f7b-30e5-4eaf-9c80-3b0da99ca863

2026-03-04 14:59:05 CET

- reply

For JustEat drivers the options are not good. Few companies are competing to offer them a better workplace; instead there seems to be a new race to the bottom for workers’ rights.

2026-03-04 14:59:04 CET

All change at JustEat Takeaway - new owners promise an 'AI first' business, but what will that mean for drivers?
https://privacyinternational.org/news-analysis/5731/what-does-prosuss-buyout-mean-justeat-drivers
https://6-28.mastodon.xyz/media_attachments/files/116/171/259/434/316/948/original/9b78c48e414f67fb.jpeg

2026-03-04 14:59:04 CET

- reply

Even if Prosus do make working conditions for drivers worse, then drivers may be disappointed (if not surprised) to find that their other options - big figures including Deliveroo and Uber Eats - have received huge fines in recent years for violating their drivers’ rights.

2026-03-03 13:30:12 CET

- reply

But we won't stop. We keep fighting to ensure that everyone is protected against government overreach that undermines people's rights, autonomy and dignity.
Find out more 👉 privacyinternational.org/long-read/5738/analysis-disclosures-following-ico-enforcement-notice-gps-tagging-migrants

2026-03-03 13:30:12 CET

- reply

These findings are disturbing. They indicate a lack of respect for the authority and expertise of regulatory oversight bodies. When such mechanisms are undermined, so is our ability to hold the UK government to account and to effectively protect people.

2026-03-03 13:30:12 CET

- reply

The invasiveness and life-altering impact of continuous monitoring of people by compelling GPS tracking has no regard for the right to privacy and other fundamental rights.

2026-03-03 13:30:12 CET

- reply

Not only has the government not adequately addressed the data protection violations identified by the ICO, but it has pushed legislation that overlooks its findings completely.
https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2024/03/ico-finds-the-home-office-s-pilot-of-gps-electronic-monitoring-of-migrants-breached-uk-data-protection-law/

2026-03-03 13:30:11 CET

PI is concerned that the authority of regulatory oversight mechanisms is being undermined by the UK government.
https://privacyinternational.org/long-read/5738/analysis-disclosures-following-ico-enforcement-notice-gps-tagging-migrants

2026-03-03 13:30:11 CET

- reply

Since the Information Commissioner's Office concluded that the GPS tagging of migrants by the UK Home Office was in breach of data protection laws, we've been analysing the Home Office's policies.
https://privacyinternational.org/news-analysis/5261/gps-tagging-migrants-unlawful-uk-authority-finds-after-pi-complaint
https://6-28.mastodon.xyz/media_attachments/files/116/165/247/602/323/634/original/b35ec766f1c34169.webp

2026-03-02 17:00:35 CET

- reply

At Privacy International, we are working to stop this. Visit our website to read our latest report about the privacy risks of VLMs.
https://privacyinternational.org/report/5736/nowhere-hide-privacy-risks-and-policy-implications-ai-geolocation

2026-03-02 17:00:35 CET

- reply

Using this technology, the state could silently surveil you more effectively, and stalkers could easily track women online.
VLMs could also have a chilling effect on freedom of assembly, and enable social media platforms to monetise location data.

2026-03-02 17:00:35 CET

- reply

VLMs can identify objects in a photo, read text from images, and recognise landmarks, architectural styles, road layouts, vegetation, climate-related features, signage, and cultural artefacts. All of this data can build up an idea of where a picture is taken.

2026-03-02 17:00:35 CET

- reply

So even if a model was trained originally to caption images, it may eventually learn to identify flags, landmarks, or understand scripts.

2026-03-02 17:00:35 CET

- reply

Most state-of-the-art VLMs are closed-source, so we don’t understand their inner workings. But we do know that they can have emergent qualities - new features that develop over time.

2026-03-02 17:00:35 CET

- reply

Right now, VLMs are not entirely accurate. Some models tested only guessed the location in a photo within 1 km of the exact spot 29% of the time. But technology is improving all the time.

2026-03-02 17:00:34 CET

Billions of photos are shared on social media every day. Each one of those is now a portal to your precise location.
New developments in a type of artificial intelligence called Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are a huge threat on your privacy.
https://privacyinternational.org/report/5736/nowhere-hide-privacy-risks-and-policy-implications-ai-geolocation

2026-03-02 14:07:05 CET

Anthropic refused to support the Department of War - but OpenAI stepped in to fill the gap.
And once again, the United States is bombing the Middle East.
We can’t rely on companies’ sense of morality to protect people from the militarisation of tech.
https://privacyinternational.org/news-analysis/5739/anthropic-and-us-government-conflict-larger-you-think

2026-03-01 15:05:01 CET

No-one knows what JustEat Takeaway's new owners will mean for the working conditions of their drivers
https://privacyinternational.org/news-analysis/5731/what-does-prosuss-buyout-mean-just-eat-drivers

2026-02-27 19:00:10 CET

Anthropic and the US government have been fighting this week.
This fight is not just about surveillance, but is part of the wider trend towards the militarisation of tech.
https://www.privacyinternational.org/news-analysis/5739/anthropic-and-us-government-conflict-larger-you-think

2026-02-27 18:23:02 CET

What does Prosus’s buyout mean for Just Eat drivers?
https://privacyinternational.org/news-analysis/5731/what-does-prosuss-buyout-mean-just-eat-drivers

2026-02-26 17:46:01 CET

Private military and security companies are using more drones, facial recognition and spyware to monitor people - and what starts on the battlefield will soon come to your backyard
https://blog.icoca.ch/exploring-the-privatisation-of-surveillance-and-its-human-rights-implications/

2026-02-26 15:36:02 CET

Discord’s decision to pause its rollout of age verification emphasises what privacy advocates have been long-saying about the technology: it creates a honeypot for malicious individuals, with no guarantees for users that the company they’re uploading their face to is safe.
https://privacyinternational.org/news-analysis/5737/discord-pushes-back-age-verification-after-security-risks-revealed

2026-02-26 11:02:42 CET

- reply

The UK Home Office has just undertaken a public consultation on governing biometric technologies in policing, including FRT.
We hope this consultation leads to meaningful change to ensure this situation does not happen again.

2026-02-26 11:02:42 CET

FRT has led to yet another wrongful arrest in the UK. This time, a man was detained for hours after the technology matched him to a burglary 100 miles away in spite of clear differences.
The police retained an image of the man after he was attacked 5 years prior. Even an innocent person’s face can remain searchable in police databases, potentially triggering future ‘matches’ and further scrutiny.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/feb/25/facial-recognition-error-prompts-police-to-arrest-asian-man-for-burglary-100-miles-away

2026-02-26 11:02:42 CET

- reply

What’s more, FRT has repeatedly been shown to misidentify people, disproportionately impacting racialised communities.
When police treat a match like this as sufficient grounds for arrest, the presumption of innocence is weakened and due process is undermined.
This is not just a one off either. It’s a consequence of deploying biased, opaque biometric systems at scale with little legislation governing it.

2026-02-26 11:02:42 CET

- reply

A high court ruling from back in 2012 ruled that holding data of innocent people was unlawful, yet 14 years on, that seems to have been ignored. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/feb/24/police-told-to-delete-on-request-images-of-innocent-people

2026-02-25 18:23:06 CET

- reply

For example: they had to pay compensation to a black delivery driver who a judge agreed was locked out of the app due to a ‘racist failure’ of the company’s automated facial recognition driver verification system
https://g1.globo.com/df/distrito-federal/noticia/2025/06/30/justica-condena-ifood-a-indenizar-entregador-do-df-por-danos-morais-apos-falha-racista-em-reconhecimento-facial-entenda.ghtml

2026-02-25 18:23:05 CET

No-one knows what JustEat Takeaway’s new owners, investment company Prosus, will mean for the working conditions of their drivers
https://privacyinternational.org/news-analysis/5731/what-does-prosuss-buyout-mean-just-eat-drivers

2026-02-25 18:23:05 CET

- reply

But it’s not currently clear what ‘AI first’ will mean for JustEat’s existing drivers across Europe

2026-02-25 18:23:05 CET

- reply

One way to find out is to look to iFood - a similar food delivery company in Brazil owned by Prosus - who claim to use over 124 AI models.
https://institucional.ifood.com.br/inovacao/ifood-etica-ia/

2026-02-25 18:23:05 CET

- reply

Alas - the webpage which promises to explain more currently only displays a 403 Forbidden error message:
https://news.ifood.com.br/onde-e-como-o-ifood-utiliza-inteligencia-artificial/
https://6-28.mastodon.xyz/media_attachments/files/116/132/425/373/906/890/original/425877a5a874dbb8.png

2026-02-25 18:23:05 CET

- reply

Prosus bought the food delivery company touting the ‘opportunity to create an AI First offering’
https://www.prosus.com/~/media/Files/P/Prosus-CORP/investors/prosus-to-acquire-jet-investor-presentation.pdf

2026-02-25 18:23:05 CET

- reply

Despite this lack of transparency from iFood themselves, more can be found in the various sanctions they have received from Brazilian authorities.

2026-02-06 18:23:01 CET

- reply

With this much data being processed, AI tools will likely be deployed to unlock access to details of our lives for border and immigration agencies.

2026-02-06 18:23:01 CET

- reply

Companies and governments must push back now, lest they enable and copy these practices. Now’s not the time to seek profit by enabling injustice, it’s the time to step up and protect everyone and our data.

2026-02-06 18:23:01 CET

- reply

The US Government wants to require five years of social media data and ten years of email addresses, including business accounts. Accumulating this most intimate personal data will create an unprecedented immigration system.

2026-02-06 18:23:01 CET

The Trump Administration is expanding its border management systems so that visitors to the US must submit social media, email identifiers, and even DNA data for entry. https://privacyinternational.org/news-analysis/5713/trump-administration-wants-your-dna-and-social-media

2026-01-23 18:23:03 CET

- reply

A report also flagged bias against black and Asian people in the algorithm used by police forces across the UK for retrospective FRT. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/dec/05/urgent-clarity-sought-over-racial-bias-in-uk-police-facial-recognition-technology

2026-01-23 18:23:03 CET

- reply

As well as more police forces across England acquiring police vans being equipped with live FRT. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clykr14glnwo

2026-01-23 18:23:03 CET

- reply

FRT is mass surveillance tool, paving the way to a dystopian surveillance state with the power to track us 24/7, as we go about our daily lives. https://privacyinternational.org/long-read/5155/uk-mps-asleep-wheel-facial-recognition-technology-spells-end-privacy-public

2026-01-23 18:23:02 CET

After continuous calls from civil society about the harms of FRT and the need to regulate its use, the Home Office has published an open consultation on the legal framework for using FRT in law enforcement. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/legal-framework-for-using-facial-recognition-in-law-enforcement

2026-01-23 18:23:02 CET

- reply

Throughout 2025 we saw the rapid expansion of facial recognition technology (FRT) on streets across the UK, raising worrying questions for our human rights.

2026-01-23 18:23:02 CET

- reply

Deployments in London have skyrocketed, and we have seen the installment of permanent live FRT cameras in Croydon, South London. https://privacyinternational.org/long-read/5682/toward-regulation-addressing-legal-void-facial-recognition-technology

2026-01-23 00:07:01 CET

You have until the 12th February to tell the Home Office what you think about the deployment of facial recognition by law enforcement in the UK: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/legal-framework-for-using-facial-recognition-in-law-enforcement

2026-01-22 11:22:01 CET

- reply

ChatGPT's advertising trial will display sponsored content alongside its conversational responses to users' queries. OpenAI claims that advertisers won't influence the chatbot's output, and that you can turn off personalisation - though it's unclear what this means in practice.

2026-01-15 15:01:53 CET

Drones have moved from being recreational tools to becoming key devices in sectors like agriculture, security, journalism, and environmental management. This same technology that enables the delivery of medicines to remote areas can also be used to monitor protests, control territories, or deepen social inequalities. A new study by @nprofile…ksyg highlights how, in Paraguay, drone regulation remains fragmented and weak in the face of the growing challenges posed by their use. https://www.tedic.org/en/release-drones-in-paraguay-what-impact-do-they-have-on-our-rights/

2026-01-06 19:01:59 CET

Political Billboards is a civic tech initiative by Impetus that brings order to the chaos of political advertising in public spaces across North Macedonia. By mapping every billboard used for paid political campaigns, the platform shows who is advertising where and how in public space – and with public funding. Citizens are invited to participate: anyone can send photos and GPS locations of billboards from their town. https://political-billboards.mk/

2025-12-28 20:00:38 CET

- reply

Deployments in London have skyrocketed, and we have seen the instalment of permanent live FRT cameras in Croydon, South London. https://privacyinternational.org/long-read/5682/toward-regulation-addressing-legal-void-facial-recognition-technology

2025-12-28 20:00:38 CET

Throughout 2025 we have seen the rapid expansion of facial recognition technology (FRT) on streets across the UK, raising worrying questions for our human rights.

2025-11-22 18:23:01 CET

Revealed: Europol is quietly building a vast AI-driven criminal data hub, sweeping up messages, biometrics, and other sensitive info with minimal oversight or transparency, raising major risks for privacy, civil rights, and biased policing.

2025-11-15 11:22:01 CET

We are deeply concerned about news regarding the expansion of vans equipped with live facial recognition technology (FRT) cameras to 7 police forces across England. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clykr14glnwo

2025-04-07 18:23:02 CEST

- reply

This means that soon the Tribunal will decide on the legality of the UK Government's alleged use of its TCN powers on Apple and the use of TCNs more generally. An exciting development. Stay tuned!

2025-04-07 18:23:01 CEST

- reply

This order, also known as a Technical Capability Notice (TCN), is an extremely intrusive surveillance power of the UK government. It allows them to order companies to do (or not do) certain things while forcing them to keep it all secret!

2025-04-07 18:23:01 CEST

- reply

The UK Government insisted on keeping all details of the case entirely secret, including the names of the parties involved and the very existence of Apple's challenge, in addition to its substance.

2025-04-07 18:23:01 CEST

- reply

Apple took the Government to the IPT, a body tasked with investigating surveillance complaints. A secret hearing took place on 14 March 2025. We filed an application for the hearing to be open, and submitted a complaint challenging the TCN regime on various grounds.

2025-04-07 14:04:20 CEST

- reply

If you want to support our work and make sure we can keep fighting against powers like these, please consider donating and supporting our work: https://pvcy.org/DonateNow

2025-03-28 18:23:02 CET

- reply

You may have seen that US Government officials accidentally added a journalist to a group chat, where senior US Government officials were discussing the United States’ military strikes in Yemen.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/signal-group-chat-attack-plans-hegseth-goldberg/682176/

2025-03-28 18:23:02 CET

- reply

We may not all be discussing military plans, but the conversations we do have are personal.
It is crucial that when we message using “secure” methods, that those messages are actually exchanged securely.
https://privacyinternational.org/news-analysis/5550/ghost-protocol-more-journalists-your-group-chats

2025-03-25 11:22:01 CET

- reply

This highly invasive technology has the potential to pave the road to a dystopian biometric surveillance state, where everyone is identified and tracked everywhere they go, in real time, as they move through public spaces and get on with their everyday lives.

2025-03-20 18:23:02 CET

- reply

Now it's #TimeToDeliverAnswers - find out more about our campaign and our recommendations: https://gigeconomy.privacyinternational.org/

2025-03-20 18:23:01 CET

Personalised explanations of algorithmic decisions are not something platforms can pick and choose. The European Court of Justice (CJEU) just said it's a legal requirement.

2025-03-20 18:23:01 CET

- reply

The CJEU's judgement in the Dun & Bradstreet case clarifies what information must be provided to anyone subjected to solely automated decision making.

2025-03-20 18:23:01 CET

- reply

This information has to include the procedure and principles that were actually applied in the decision, and potentially also explain how a different result could have been achieved.

2025-03-13 21:59:30 CET

- reply

A month ago, it was leaked that the UK government used its TCN powers to demand Apple develop the capability to hand over encrypted iCloud data, threatening the privacy and security of users all over the world.
Apple appears to have responded by withdrawing its Advanced Data Protection (ADP) services in the UK.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/02/07/apple-encryption-backdoor-uk/

2025-03-10 12:45:29 CET

- reply

Apple responded by withdrawing its Advanced Data Protection (‘ADP’) services, meaning UK users will no longer have the option to add end-to-end encryption to their photos, documents and other kinds of data stored on iCloud.
In addition, the company has reportedly also taken the UK government to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), a body tasked with deciding on surveillance matters.

2025-03-10 12:45:29 CET

- reply

A month ago, we found out via The Washington Post that the UK government has used its Powers to issue a notice to Apple to hand over encrypted iCloud data, threatening the privacy and security of users all over the world.
This notice was via a TCN, and they represent a dangerous, disproportionate and intrusive surveillance power available to the government under the current UK surveillance regime.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/02/07/apple-encryption-backdoor-uk/

2025-03-10 12:45:29 CET

- reply

But we aren’t supposed to know any of this, as TCNs are extremely secretive and it is an offence for Apple to talk publicly about this or tell anyone about the existence or contents of the order.
Instead, widespread international media reporting, comments made by Donald Trump and Apple’s own actions have rendered continued secrecy regarding the existence of the TCN moot, untenable and ridiculous.

2025-03-10 12:45:28 CET

🆕 We’re demanding transparency on the UK government’s ‘Technical Capability Notices’ (TCN) - a secret power that gives itself the right to issue secret orders to any company, undermining the security of everyone across the world.
https://privacyinternational.org/advocacy/5535/privacy-internationals-letter-uk-home-office-demanding-transparency-technical