Alyx Hinata 🇹🇩🚫:unverified:💀

なんで君はこれを読んでいるかよ

Just another random person passing by.

Oh hi.

The Alyx Vance must go this way anyway.

Gordon Freeman dies in All Dogs Go To Heaven 2.

I wasn't designed to be carried.

En Taro Igel!

Lift me up, let me go...

Gender:: Yes, I definitely have one of those.
Sex:: Yes, please!
Clan:: Hyūga
Nationality:: Martian
Location:: Neptune
Occupation:: Retired

Public Key

npub1q6c8ehxqcjvjpp4xapj537fvd0595z0j2ylwa94satlw8qajyg6qgjes4x

NIP-05 Address

[email protected]

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsqdvrumnqvfxfqs6nwse2glykxh6z6p8e9z0hwj6cw4lhrswezydqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds02xu40

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1q6c8ehxqcjvjpp4xapj537fvd0595z0j2ylwa94satlw8qajyg6qgjes4x

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-08-07 12:30:00 UTC

- reply

I honestly can't even comprehend these censorious bastards these days. The internet was probably the biggest driving force of globalism. Everyone is aware that the lefties that are pushing these censorship laws and policies are globalists. They probably orgasm at the thought of one world government. But then they go and nerf the one tool that would have brought them globalism by itself, without them doing anything at all.
I know these people are not particularly smart, but this really is a brain dead move.

2025-08-07 12:20:54 UTC

- reply

Next you're gonna tell me Jews ran the Holocaust. You're a moron. The Bolshevik Revolution fucking targeted Jews too, you imbecile. Were they killing their own people then too just for shits and giggles? Or maybe, just fucking maybe, Jews aren't a cabal, aren't an unified hive mind like you want them to be, and it's ultimately toxic ideologies that make people do shitty things.
>There are "more" normies, who always obey "the rulers," than rulers?
Stop coping like a moron. The rulers that fuck up your country are of your own race. You're just too brain dead to cope with this fact. You are betrayed by your own kin. But you cannot accept it because it hurts your fee-fees too much. Well thought shit. You're not part of a magic good race, that can do no evil. All humans are capable of unspeakable horrors, just like we are all capable of creating technological wonders. It's the culture and ideologies we surround ourselves with that ultimately guide us. And Americans, along with so many westerners, decided to surround themselves and embrace communist ideologies and have been acting on it.
I've already told you why Jewish over-representation in various fields exists, but once again, you can't cope with the truth, that your kin, your fellow American whites, are shit at raising and educating your children. All you do is plop your kid in front of a TV or tablet and expect them to raise up successful. Guess what, that doesn't work. Americans have been too busy indulging in wealth to actually take care of their own children.
You know how black people will become lazy because they get used to receiving governments handouts? Well Jews received the opposite treatment for centuries. They got nothing but shitty treatment since well before your great-great-grandfather was in diapers. As a consequence, they had the opposite reaction, they worked harder than any other ethnic group to make a living, and to make sure their children will make a living. Their success is a direct consequence of antisemites like you.
And you can do nothing but cope and seethe at the fact that they're smarter and more successful than you. Well thought shit, go fucking fix your culture. Screeching on the internet won't do anything. But maybe if you go and make sure your son understands and does his math homework, maybe that can help him become a banker. But will you actually do it? Of course not. You'll just go back to complaining that "muh Juice" isn't teaching your kid math instead.
As usual, antisemites are the most pathetic people on Earth.
"The jews are so much more successful, and are over-represented, it's so unfair"
Tough shit. Do you expect DEI and affirmative action now too? Go fucking work you lazy bum, and stop being a whiny loser.

2025-08-06 15:17:42 UTC

- reply

>French, Brits, White (actual) Americans are not in control of any significant institutions in our homelands, which are now Jewish-colonies. That's the problem. Why would anyone but us care about our well-being? That's why they flood in the Pajeets, Mestizos, etc.
If Jews are in control of western nations, they'd have to be living here too (which they obviously do). If they live here, they get hurt by mass immigrating Muslims, not just the same, but worst than Christians. This is indisputable. Islam and Muslim leaders literally demand the eradication of Jews. So again, this policy simply isn't beneficial for ethnically Jewish people.
This isn't some global Jewish or Israeli or Zionist conspiracy, because it simply doesn't benefit the Jewish nationality, ethnicity, or even religion.
Even if Jews wanted to eradicate Western nations because we're some kind of threat to them, or they don't like us, or they think of us inferior, what this mass immigration will achieve is simply creating more Islamic majority countries around the world. So there would be more self-declared enemies of Israel that seek it's eradication, and the eradication of Jews, as Allah commands them. How is this in the benefit of Jews, when they barely can fight against a few Islamic nation enemies around them? Why would they want even more majority Islamic nations in the world?
>Yes, some White people bought into it - so what?
It's mostly white people spreading it. That "so what". I'm not gonna blame Marx for the modern commies trying to take over institutions and overthrowing societies. I'm gonna blame the people who are ACTIVELY doing it. Just like it isn't Jews, or Marx, or even Russian soviets who are oppressing the Chinese people, or the North Koreans (it's Xi Jinping and the CCP for China, and the Kim dynasty for N. Korea), I'm gonna blame the western communists for fucking up things here, while recognizing that these communists are first and foremost comprised of white individuals, afterwards it will probably be Jews and Black people.
I'm sorry, but your worldview is simply wrong and frankly moronic. Leaving aside that Jews don't control all your institutions you claim to control, I'm sure there are some places where you have an over-representation of Jews. You know why? Because they actually take the time to take care and raise their children. Because their culture actually values investing in the education of their children.
You know why you have many Jews in the banking system? Because for centuries, Jews were forbidden from working most jobs, and being a money lender was one of the few things they were left with. And the know-how got passed down through generations. It was literally antisemitism that forced them to develop the skills that you now hate them for. Congrats!
You know what other field Jews used to dominate? Basketball. Did they have some deep dark conspiracy around that too? How come black people replaced them, if they're so all powerful? Surely they wouldn't have appreciated someone else coming up in their turf. Surely they could have, and would have stopped them.

2025-08-03 09:01:10 UTC

- reply

And wrong. Don't know how many times I'll have to repeat this. What you need to place the blame on is "progressive"/woke/socialist/communist ideology. Jews are not a homogeneous group that all think the same, just like every other nationality or ethnicity. Look at French. Are they all the same politically? Of course not. They have their conservative right and their commie lefties. Same for Brits. Same for Americans. Heck, even if I restrict to only European white Americans, you still have people who hold all sorts of beliefs, including nutcases who insist on opening up America's borders, while they watch from their gated communities how immigrants rape the population.
Sure, there are absolutely Jews who are communists fuckers. But there are also European descended Americans who have actually caused the majority of the damage. The likes of Destiny, Vaush, Hasan, are obviously not Jews, but they've been indoctrinating and lying to people for years. The vast majority of "social studies" professors in universities who brainwash students are far from Jewish too, as you see over and over again how they attack Israel and defend "Palestine" and Hamas.
For every cherry picked example you find, rational people can easily find people like Gad Saad who constantly makes his position clear that he is against this open border policy, that you can't import Muslim barbarians into your country cause it will just import the barbarity, the uncivilized criminal behavior
What are you gonna do with examples like that? Are you gonna twist your brain around to say "well he's a good Jew"? Are you gonna continue being a moron, insisting that he's still evil, even when he wants the same policies for your country that you do? Or will you understand that this isn't a matter a genes, it's a matter of ideology.
I'm sure there are quotes of individual Jews saying evil and stupid stuff. Just like there are quotes of individual French, Brits, Japanese, Chinese, Americans, whites, blacks, asians, etc. I'm not here to defend someone like say George Soros. That guy in particular is horrendous enough that he would betray his own flesh and blood for money. Pretty sure he could be diagnosed as a sociopath if he ever faced a psychiatrist.
But you need to understand that the commonality you seek between the vile individuals you see as your enemies is not nationality, it's not ethnicity, or race. It's political ideology. (religion is a decent metric for Muslims cause Islam itself is an outlier of a religion, but it's not useful for Jews cause as far as I can tell, the average Jew takes their religion less seriously than the average Christian. And while Americans take Christianity somewhat seriously, Europeans really don't)
If you fail to see this, if you can't focus your attention specifically on this overarching authoritarian left-wing ideology, and you only complain about "muh Juice", 2 things will happen:
1) well frankly, people are just gonna ignore you, and you'll fail to accomplish anything. Quite the contrary, you are actively detrimental against any fight against things like unlimited mass-migration.
2) you'll simply fail your mission, because while you focus on the Jews (and maybe, by some miracle, you'll hinder the individual communist Jews who are harming your country) American communist, European communists, white aryan ubermensch communists, will fuck you over like you could never imagine.

2025-08-01 10:30:18 UTC

- reply

So let me get this right. You think western Jews decided they wanted Muslims (their self declared mortal enemies) to come live in the west and threatened their lives, to harass them and light them on fire. Really big brain you have there.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Fucking imbecile. Your fucking communist wannabe governments decided on the immigration policy. Your argument is the equivalent of me accusing you of putting Bill Gates in charge of vaccine and climate change policy.

2025-07-31 18:10:48 UTC

- reply

Interesting hypothesis there, but we already know that the brits have been using their new law to shut down people complaining about Muslim immigrants. So close, but not quite. It's the same old, same old. Authoritarian governments just don't want you criticizing their bad policies. Nothing more, nothing less. If you reached "muh Juice" in your theory, you're just overcomplicating things.

2025-07-25 17:48:37 UTC

- reply

So what are you asking him exactly? What does "杀猪盘" mean?

2025-07-25 16:55:52 UTC

- reply

I hope it's real, so that maybe people learn to stop uploading their ID on random websites, and start fighting against legislation that would force people to ID themselves online.

2025-07-24 14:00:17 UTC

- reply

Kinda. Besides, for a while people managed to gather together just around being truth seekers and appreciating scientific discourse.
But everything changed when the Fire Nation attacked. Or in other words, Atheism+ came along, as a bunch of power hungry psychos, pretended they had the real moral truth, and wanted to control how everyone in the community behaved.
Before people talked of social-justice, before intersectional feminism, before talks of critical race theory and DEI, before "woke", it was Atheism+. And it ultimately dissolved the community. The old groups that were supposed to advocate for Atheism and defend the separation of Church and state in US, now advocate for literally anything else but that.
That's what happens when you let these types of people in. Everything you worked for gets sabotaged and derailed. :peepoShrug:

2025-07-24 12:35:31 UTC

The Vshojo drama made me think about something... it's a bit of a stretch, but hang on with me.
So there's one thing that religions and Churches usually get credit for. Building communities. Even the Atheist movement acknowledged that one of the big reasons people don't abandon Christianity, even if they don't actually believe in god anymore, is their need to be in a community. And it's the thing I would hear a lot from Atheist figures that we needed to get better at. (Atheists never did manage to build healthy communities. Instead it all went completely to shit).
Well, I've been thinking now... are vtubers the new churches?
Like look at this shit, Ironmouse makes a video, then more vtubers and people covering the drama follow suit, and before you know it, you have a community raising over $1 million for charity. Isn't this one of those things we expect out of churches? To bring people together, to unify under a goal, and do good deeds (charity) together? And it's hardly the first hugely successful charity event vtubers lead.
And I guarantee you there are people of completely opposite sides of the political spectrum in the streams of the most popular vtubers. So they're definitely able to build a community and have people set aside differences for a couple of hours.
"But Vtubers don't preach, you dummy". You sure? I've seen plenty of examples of vtubers telling people "hey, don't be that guy". I've seen them setting moral examples and telling people right from wrong. It's not the sort of nagging preaching, sure. But then again, good priests weren't supposed to feel nagging.
We're in a new age. Why shouldn't our spiritual leaders be completely different from what we're used to? Who's to say Jesus has to reincarnate in ragged clothes? Maybe he can reincarnate as a cute anime waifu?

2025-07-01 16:07:06 UTC

- reply

Isn't Crusader Kings a video game? I think he's talking about the game.

2025-06-30 19:52:38 UTC

- reply

We don't have this in my part of Europe. I've seen a couple of such math examples over the years, and... tbh completely honest, I do find some of them as neat examples of how to think differently about math. And I would have liked to be shown some of them as a kid.
BUT, a kid shouldn't be graded on whether he understood and can apply the random common core tricks (which from what I've seen, they apparently are). Just give him 63x9, and let him choose whatever method he wants to solve that.
If he can draw the rectangles on paper, or in his mind, as fast or faster than I can use the traditional method, why stop him from using it? I think it can be useful to show different methods, just in case one of them clicks better for someone than the traditional method, and they are faster then they would have been otherwise.
BUT DON'T waste too much class time on this. Show the thing once, let the kids know they can also do things this way if they like, but don't linger on it. And don't try to grade them on knowing all the methods. At the end of the school year, they really should just know the one that is fastest for them. And just grade the fucking end result.

2025-06-27 12:42:43 UTC

- reply

They're authoritarians. They can't stand that someone else doesn't have their politics. They think their politics create the best products, and they'll force you to use those products as proof of how good they are. You refusing to switch to Wayland is akin to defying the communist regime. They cannot, and will not, stand for it.
People under soviet communism weren't able to buy western goods not because they couldn't afford them. Not because the west wasn't willing to export them. But because the regime refused to allow its subjects to be exposed to something else they could view as better. They needed the subjects to believe that communist goods were superior. And the only way to do that was to forbid their access to alternatives.
Because if the communist subjects get to see outside goods are better, then they might revolt and overthrow the regime. And we can't have that.
Notice the similarity? You're not allowed to use X11, or XLibre, because it might just lead to people saying "y'all are frauds that are making things worse".

2025-06-27 12:21:58 UTC

- reply

I am so fucking tired of these people honestly. I'm at the point where I want "progressives" either homeless on the streets, in jail, or straight up... no longer existing.

2025-06-27 12:12:44 UTC

- reply

Not wanting DEI is probably an ideology for them. They likely associate a distaste for progressivism, marxism, socialism, communism, etc., with conservatism (which in their view is fascism of course). So for them not liking DEI=fascist. That's the ideology they proclaim to oppose.

2025-06-24 13:30:11 UTC

- reply

I love how you change topics. Definitely indicative of high intelligence.
P.S. I feel the need to mention that this was sarcasm.

2025-06-24 13:26:26 UTC

- reply

If you had any clue about biology and evolution, you'd probably understand by yourself why chastity is valued in society. But clearly you don't.
But I'll make it simple for you: chastity is valued because hoes sleep around with other men.
Both men and women are biologically driven to spread their DNA to the next generation. A woman has the guarantee that her child has her DNA. A man doesn't have the guarantee that the child born by his wife is his, unless she was a virgin before he fucked her. And even then it's not 100% guarantee, but it's the best a man had before DNA testing was invented.

2025-06-24 13:11:21 UTC

- reply

Yeah. Pretty much a stereotypical case of women committing societal/reputation violence. Change how other people view your target, and let them have at it. Honestly, it's a bit psychopathic if you think about it.

2025-06-24 13:06:32 UTC

- reply

No idea. Never heard of it.

2025-06-24 13:00:37 UTC

- reply

Boredom I guess. And yeah, I even told her early on that she's probably lying to herself. What can you do.

2025-06-24 12:56:14 UTC

- reply

And women fight over accidentally going out with the same skirt as their supposed friend. Again, bitch please. Women are just as stupid, petty and bad as men are. You're no angel. You're devils pretending to be angels.

2025-06-24 11:50:54 UTC

- reply

>implying women don't do violence
Bitch please. Women are actually worse at this. At least men restrict themselves at physical violence. We throw a few punches and the thing is settled. We'll know who's on top, who gives the orders, if we don't like it we leave, but at the end of the day we can cooperate to build stuff once the hierarchy gets established.
Women go for social violence. They go after people's reputation. All the cancel culture we've lived through for the last decade has been a creation of feminists and then continued by feminist men, that thought they could gain women's attention by fighting via their rules.
There's been so much damage caused via MeToo by women that it's ridiculous. And at the end of the day, they resolved jack shit. They forcefully got Weinstein imprisoned, when really all he did was hire prostitutes and pay them by making them actors.
One big social panic after another, and nothing ever gets solved. Just women bickering for attention, never being able to establish a social hierarchy and cooperate.
And of course there's also plenty of cases like Amber Heard that go for actual violence, and because domestic dispute laws are heavily biased, they'll literally say to the man "yeah, I'll beat you, and nobody will believe you". Go have a search of cases where women leave their men bloodied, and when he tries to call the cops (cause he obviously can't hit back for the obvious reason), the police still arrest him, because the laws are fucked.
Oh yeah, tell me more of how women are soo good, and kind, and non-violent.
It's hilarious that the longer I've lived, the more Mean Girls looks like a documentary. And it doesn't take a man to see this. The first people that told me that women are mean as hell have been women. Because, guess what, some women are honest enough with themselves that they can admit things like this. Guess that's not you.

2025-06-23 19:52:48 UTC

- reply

You'd think people would get the hint when studies revealed that lesbians had the highest percentage of domestic abuse among couples.

2025-06-23 19:49:20 UTC

- reply

Go cope about your sex somewhere else. Women will LITERALLY sabotage each other when given the opportunity, while guys have had "bros before hoes" for decades.
https://www.psypost.org/a-seemingly-light-hearted-study-on-womens-haircut-advice-has-surprisingly-dark-psychological-implications/

2025-06-23 19:22:32 UTC

- reply

Next you're gonna tell me women don't wear makeup to get attention.

2025-06-23 18:04:21 UTC

- reply

If you're actually trying to say women don't compete with each other over men, you either:
1) are lying
2) are lying to yourself
3) are severely deluded
4) are lying

2025-06-23 04:51:57 UTC

Did I accidentally crack the code?
In their natural environment, women are in competition with each other over attracting the best man. But feminism gets them to compete with men instead. This tricks the more beautiful and capable women into wasting their energy somewhere else, potentially eliminating them from the dating market, while the more ugly, feminist types are left with less competition. Thus giving them an advantage in the mating game they wouldn't have had before.
This was a first thought as I woke up in the morning, so I'm sure there's holes and flaws in the reasoning. But it might be worth keeping in mind.

2025-06-18 20:36:36 UTC

- reply

FarCry 1?

2025-06-16 08:58:53 UTC

- reply

:peepoShrug: use it well I guess.

2025-06-16 05:00:03 UTC

- reply

I didn't choose autism. I was born in it, molded by it. You merely adopted autism.

2025-06-16 04:46:19 UTC

- reply

Almost two decades ago, I was going through a crisis of faith of sorts. I've always been interested in science. It butted heads with Christianity, and I couldn't figure out what's what.
Having access to the internet, I thought: we're in the age of digital cameras everywhere, and free flowing information. If god is real, and he makes miracles happen, proof HAS to be out there.
So I went looking for video proof of miracles. And I only managed to find the Western equivalent of this.
That's how I started down the path to atheism. People can keep believing in Jesus and god if they want. But I simply can't. After I've seen countless examples of this, there's no way I can look at religion and not think it's the longest running scam of mankind.

2025-06-13 04:18:11 UTC

I can hardly believe it...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXBLxUWwoMY

2025-06-12 11:26:33 UTC

Literal skinwalker... kinda scary.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC4RaazFs7M

2025-06-11 14:56:21 UTC

- reply

Have you tried it? How do you know you wouldn't like it if you don't try it?

2025-06-11 14:52:32 UTC

- reply

Have you considered becoming the gf yourself?

2025-06-10 10:24:31 UTC

Call me crazy, but I think the president of Mexico basically declared war on USA.
As the president of your nation, and the president of all those immigrants into US, both legal and illegal, that are rioting, your responsibility is to call on your citizens to stop protesting, and to urge them to allow you, their elected representative, to negotiate with US on their behalf.
The second you called on your citizens to mobilize, you effectively called on them to act as your military. You infiltrated your army within US borders, and now you're calling an attack against the sovereignty of a nation. You are calling for war. That is not acceptable.
This is one of those moments where I'm glad that I'm not American and that I don't live in USA. That I don't have to personally experience any of this shit. Previous federal administrations, and multiple state governments have allowed a dangerous status-quo to take root. They've allowed, or maybe even intentionally encouraged, the weakening of US sovereignty. And now we're seeing the results, where a foreign president dares encourage anarchists, terrorists and insurrectionists to crate chaos and destruction within your country.
So I'm definitely fucking glad that I'm not dealing with this shit in my life, and I hope Trump sends in the military to impose some quick order. Anything less won't be enough to reestablish long-term order.
The US, and even the entire world, cannot afford this riot to subside in a few weeks, only to start again in a few months, or next year. Nobody can afford that instability. It needs to be ENDED.

2025-06-03 15:53:37 UTC

- reply

I'm conflicted here. On one side: GOOD. On the other: we've seen with other cases where either long embargoes or outright refusing to send the product to reviewers/media usually means that the product is kinda bad, and the seller wants to trick consumers into overspending for crap.
Nintendo has a decent track record for delivering good products, but these days you can never be too sure.

2025-05-19 14:08:28 UTC

- reply

As the guys at EFAP would say: why are we subjecting children to crap? Children, probably most of all, should be exposed to well written story telling, because it helps their brain develop. Not Disney slop.

2025-05-19 14:05:12 UTC

- reply

I was a fan. But just like you, I received the message loud and clear back around Wonder Woman and Black Panther. "These things are not for you". So I stopped watching a lot of things. Star Wars being among them. These days I hear Andor is good, but I refuse to watch it too. It's not like their message actually changed. And even if it did, the Disney continuity is already poisoned. Not worth getting invested.
As a side note, this is your periodic reminder that there's more bad Star Wars cannon content than good Star Wars cannon content. As such, I say that this makes Star Wars an objectively bad franchise.

2025-05-16 13:47:29 UTC

Pedophiles have ruined the word "map" for me. I'll watch some streamer playing some RPG game, and they'll mention opening the game's map, or mentioning maps in some way, and it will make me cringe and pray that nobody mentions the other meaning the word carries today.

2025-05-13 14:16:05 UTC

- reply

Hmmm... What app is this?

2025-05-11 10:11:44 UTC

Imagine calling Dave Rubin a fascist... the guy is barely able to make belief being "conservative" (and I know I'm gonna get flack for being this generous with him already), and you think he's a fascist? Are you insane? Well, of course you are. You have "anarchist" in your bio.
https://media.gameliberty.club/media/media_attachments/files/114/488/656/408/893/336/original/c95c7f46f7308945.png

2025-05-09 10:56:29 UTC

People say "calm your tits" all the time. How come no one ever says "calm your dick"?

2025-05-01 11:09:47 UTC

- reply

You're literally just using different words to describe the same thing I said.
You don't go out on a three hour date with a fling. You meet him in a club or a pub, see that he's handsome and you immediately go and fuck him.
And I already mentioned about the guy on the left that he doesn't look like someone obsessed with lifting. To quote myself: "when they think about someone they want for a long term relationship/marriage, they will pick the guy on the left, who is still decently fit, but looks like he'll do other stuff with his life other than lifting weights, so he's more likely to be a good provider."

2025-05-01 08:39:22 UTC

- reply

The best explanation I've heard comes from women MRAs.
Basically, women are and aren't lying about this. When they're single, they're more likely to pick the guy on the right for a fling, a sexual escapade, whatever you want to call it.
But if they're in the mindset of settling down, when they think about someone they want for a long term relationship/marriage, they will pick the guy on the left, who is still decently fit, but looks like he'll do other stuff with his life other than lifting weights, so he's more likely to be a good provider.
It's basically a rehash of the old alpha/beta male thing. They'll fuck around with the bad boy "alpha", until they decide they want to settle down, at which time they pick a "beta" that is loyal, will provide for them, that may even raise children that aren't biologically his.
Something else to note, which I haven't seen anyone address yet, women's preferences change if they're on the pill. This has been studied. And I suspect it would influence women's behavior into picking the guy on the left, because the pill essentially tricks their body into thinking they're pregnant. So hormones are gonna force them into the "I need to settle down" mindset.

2025-04-30 12:29:40 UTC

- reply

Bruh... I'm not Canadian, and one doesn't need to be Canadian to understand that the situation is very different between Canada and USA on the migration issue.
Canada doesn't have the illegal immigration problem that US has, because they don't share a border with a third world country, like US does. You don't get into Canada by illegally crossing a border, like you do in US. And you can't even get in via boats, like in EU or UK. It's not as easy to get into Canada as it is for US. As such, Canada doesn't get the crime issues from illegal immigrants.
The way you get into Canada is by plane. Which means you need 3 things: a plane ticket, a passport and a visa.
The plane ticket requirements ensures you have a bit a money and ensures your ID gets checked.
A valid passport ensures you're not a known criminal in your country of origin, because most countries out there don't give passports to criminals, so that they don't flee from justice.
A visa requirement ensures that Canada itself does a minimal amount of background vetting. Even if someone goes to Canada with just a travel visa, and overstays their visa, the background check needed to get a visa still ensures that the immigrant is of higher quality than a large amount of illegal immigrants that come to US via the border with Mexico.
You can't appeal to Canadians via immigration simply because the immigrants they get are simply of a higher quality on average. They don't get the same crime problems that US gets.
Trump didn't win twice on migration because "they took our jobs", he won because "they're eating our cats, they're eating our dogs". You won't convince Canadians with "Indians are stealing your jobs", because that wasn't what ultimately convinced Americans either. And as long as Indians don't bring in drugs on mass, don't traffic children, don't commit gang violence, and don't commit massive amounts of other crimes, no Canadian will give a crap that Indians are there in massive numbers, and will just look at you like you're a crazy racist for caring, and they'll ignore you.
Canadians are very privileged, and they may very well be the nation with the most secure border in the world, because of the single act of US buying up Alaska from Russia back in the day. This is why it is ineffective to bring up immigration to Canadians. It will never work for them as an argument simply because the mere existence of USA provides them the best border security in the world by default.

2025-04-29 17:03:49 UTC

- reply

>I hope you're ready for more unfettered immigration
Immigration is not really Canada's top issue... I mean, for fucks sake, they border USA, not Mexico. How many Americans do you know who actually want to move to Canada? They don't deal with immigration the same way America does. So that's a poor example to pick. Every other social justice/woke authoritarian policy, yeah, those are problems in Canada. Immigration? Not so much.
I know people are blaming Trump's tariffs for how things went down, but honestly... I don't think there was ever a real chance for Canada to not vote liberal. It fell from earlier on and deeper down the marxist rabbit hole, so it will be much harder for them to pull themselves back. They likely need to suffer more from left-wing policies until they figure something ain't right.

2025-04-23 17:17:42 UTC

- reply

Honestly, if someone were to say "based" or "cucked" next to me IRL... that'd be cringe and I wouldn't really want to be next to that guy either. I'm of the opinion that internet slang shouldn't be uttered IRL.
"Normie" just barely makes the cut to being acceptable, but only because there isn't a political association with it. You hear "based" and you probably think of some kind of right-wing, you hear "cucked" and probably think about a male feminist. "Normie" can be about gaming, anime, all sorts of niche fandoms and hobbies.

2025-04-17 07:46:54 UTC

- reply

It feels like a year or two ago when he/she/whatever appeared on Sitch&Adam and basically admitted that he/she/whatever didn't change political views one bit, but only realized that the left needs to adjust signalling to get the moderates on board. Or in other words, bullshit your way into tricking the good faith moderates into your psychopathic movement.
So until I see her directly say GamerGate was completely right, I have no reason to believe Brianna changed in any way as a person, and isn't still the same corrupt entitled prick.

2025-04-12 08:04:43 UTC

- reply

Oh?! This looks interesting. What is this?

2025-04-09 18:02:32 UTC

- reply

I'd guess: 90% of the time use it as phone, 10% use it as a tablet. When they need to read some pdf or something, flip it open. Maybe even watch a movie while on a plane, or something. Just random small things from time to time.

2025-04-09 17:52:41 UTC

- reply

I've never seen one that got actual use out of it. I've seen a few in store displays, and they don't have any real noticeable crease to speak of. Maybe slight bumps or lumps, because the screen isn't hard glass, so it's not a perfectly flat surface. They look perfectly usable imo.
But those phones don't get real use, so I've got no clue how they end up IRL.

2025-04-03 15:15:16 UTC

I've been thinking about something last night. I'm starting to think that this could be it, that what we're experiencing right now is the height of human civilization on Earth.
I think that, because we didn't build up nuclear energy in time, we will fail to make the transition away from fossil fuels fast enough, we'll run out, and we'll reach a point where we won't be able to make enough energy to sustain societies as they are today.
A collapse will come. But that's not the real issue. The real issue is that without an abundance of oil anymore, without that much cheap energy, human civilization won't be able to rebound, and will basically remain stuck to somewhere around steam engine stage. At best we might see steampunk become a reality.
I've been thinking about something similar for some time. Humanity owes its technological advancement to fossil fuels. To forests and critters of countless millions of years ago that died and got buried before they could decompose.
As such, ANY intelligent alien civilization NEEDS to evolve on a planet that has fossil fuels in the ground already. If an intelligent life form evolves before fossil fuels get created through geological processes, or where they don't exist for any other reason, that's it. That's a technological dead end for them. They'll be stuck at a medieval stage, forever.
"But muh solar power" NO! You're not gonna make solar panels from burning wood. If you're struggling to barely melt metal, you're not gonna have the cheap resources needed to experiment and research anything more than a basic axe and a sword.
And remember the social panic there was in the 90s, that we were cutting down all trees to make paper? Now imagine trying to sustain a high population civilization that BURNS only wood for everything.
You are not building a technological civilization off of wood. At the very minimum you need coal, but realistically you need oil. No civilization, alien or otherwise, will EVER make the transition from burning wood to solar panels. Same goes for wind. You think you'll create fine copper wire to make electric engines and generators by burning wood?
Now going back to humanity. If societies collapse. That's it. We don't have readily available oil. The reserves we still have need highly advanced machinery to extract. Machinery that might not survive a collapse, or that we'll lose the knowledge of how to use.
We still have a lot of coal, but I'm not sure if even that is easily exploitable anymore. Can you still find coal with nothing more than pickaxes as tools?
After the collapse happens, there will be no more smartphones, no more computers, no more internet, anymore. Ever. For as long as Earth continues to orbit around the Sun, humanity will continue, but will remain stuck in much more primitive societies.
This is not something I expect to happen in the next decade. Not in our lifetimes either. Could take a few centuries. But I think it could happen.
Our energy needs are growing too fast. First cryptocoin and now AI have been the world's dumbest ideas when we're struggling to deal with finding energy alternatives. And dumber ideas are sure to be on the horizon still.
IF nuclear energy had been abundant, this wouldn't have been an issue. But instead of growing nuclear capabilities, we've decimated them. Now there's talks about a revitalization. But projections for the first batches of new generation nuclear power plants are for like 2050 or something. And that's assuming the political willpower is maintained until then. Which... fucking hell people... western nations can't keep it together for 5 years, let alone decades.
Even if I assume mere stupidity, and not outright malice, the world's political system is essentially trying to kill humanity.
But going back a bit, with energy usage growing so fast, at some point something will collapse. If people start rioting and pillaging AI server farms and solar plants, if people start chaos and revolutions, you think energy plants will survive? You think fragile solar panels will be intact? You'll have South Africa style situations where the infrastructure will be compromised, and left in taters to the point where you can't even use every bit of energy making capacity you have left to create new solar panels, new windfarms, etc.
You won't be able to grow back, because trying to ration energy for basic industry instead of population needs will just get you a free noose around your neck as part of a new population revolt.
And solar panels wear out. So do wind farms. You won't be able to replace them, more and more of them will fail, until you have nothing left and are back to burning wood to stay warm during winter.
If you had an abundance of cheap oil, gas, coal, sure you can build back. Just burn more and more. But you're not building back from solar and wind.
I don't think it will happen within our lifetimes. So unless you care that much about your great-grandchildren, this really isn't something that will affect you. Not something you should care about.
But if you have some deep optimism and hope that one day humanity will reach the stars, if you're like me and hope humanity will exist forever more, discover everything there is to discover, explore all the deep blue and the cosmos, reach the pinnacle of science and technology that we can't even imagine yet... If you're romantic in that way... this is a sobering thought to consider.

2025-04-03 09:05:13 UTC

- reply

Pretty based for having integrated auto-mapping, inventory, character windows etc. I found a few years back a program that gives these facilities for a few old cRPGs like Might&Magic by hacking into DosBox.
https://www.eskimo.com/~edv/lockscroll/WhereAreWe/

2025-03-22 06:23:57 UTC

There's one thing you NEVER get to lecture me on, and that's what a dictator looks like. If your country never experienced any of the authoritarian nightmares that branched from Marxism, yes including fascism, you don't have a right to debate me.

2025-03-19 10:40:32 UTC

- reply

Read an article last week, and some guys were claiming we're maybe 2 years away from AGI.
On one hand I doubt we're THAT close, on another it shouldn't take a genius to realize that the pattern seeking approach that LLMs use is what human brains do too, so maybe we're closer than people realize. I wouldn't be surprised if it took years to realize we have an AGI on our hands after the AGI was created.

2025-03-14 17:48:55 UTC

- reply

You just made me realize something. Reducing piracy did nothing to improve the quality of entertainment media.
There's been less piracy in games (thanks to Valve and GoG), movies and TV series (thanks to Netflix, Amazon Prime, HBO Max, Disney+, etc.), and music (thanks to iTunes and other music streaming), and yet the quality of entertainment has dropped more and more.
Anyone trying to argue that piracy reduces the revenue for the people involved in these productions, and thus leaves them with less money with which to fund good future projects and harming the quality of entertainment, has been debunked.
If anything, there might be a better argument to be made for the reverse. The threat of piracy is more likely to force producers to make good shit, because people are more likely to want to spend money and reward people who make good shit, even if they could get it for free.

2025-03-12 17:11:18 UTC

- reply

I'm getting them too. I watched regular Minecraft stuff, and some videos on Alien lore and other monster horror stuff. So in my case, it looks like a logical combination.

2025-02-27 17:21:00 UTC

- reply

>will go
Did they give this interview from the past or something? Does someone at Gamefreak own a time machine?
P.S. Today marks 29 years since Pokemon released. How long do they think they can keep a franchise going?

2025-02-25 15:24:16 UTC

- reply

Somehow this smells a bit like BS, because this is the first time I've heard anything about black holes requiring anything that could be described as "exotic matter".
Also, the entire singularity problem has kinda been debunked before. You see, if you do the math with Einstein's equations, and assume a static (non-rotating) black hole, you get a singularity as a result of the equations. But to date, all observed black holes have been found to be spinning.
Doing the math on a spinning black hole is much, much harder, but apparently you don't get a singularity anymore from Einstein's equations. You still get an event horizon, a point beyond which the gravity is so large that no light can escape, but underneath that the matter is shaped into a highly dense donut shape. No physics breaking, infinitely small, singularity required.
Of course, Einstein's theory is considered incomplete, and people are looking and hoping for a quantum gravity theory to know for sure what happens in these extreme conditions.

2025-02-19 06:53:16 UTC

- reply

Electromagnetic radiation is studied all the time, and nothing ever comes out of it. So that's gonna be a dead end.
SSRis... while likely too many people take them, I don't think every chronic disease sufferer out there takes them. In general worth investigating their effects more, but I don't think this will help his cause.
I have my doubts about vaccines, since I doubt there's any of them not used in other parts of the world. But if they think they can find a particular unique thing about how US vaccinates people that maybe has an effect, I'm not against doing studies.
My bet would be on processed foods and maybe pesticides.

2025-02-15 10:31:01 UTC

- reply

Do you remember when fact checker sites started being a thing? Cause I remember still being very interested in the Atheist scene when I heard about it. So it would likely have been in a time period when I still thought Obama and the Democrats were the bee's knees.
I remember thinking it was a terrible idea, and that by default you can't have an organization that decrees what is "The TRUTH™️ ". No single person or organization can decide what is true. I just saw it as a infiltration point for corruption and authoritarianism.

2025-02-11 09:48:13 UTC

- reply

That's a thing only in 'Murica. And even there, it's not mandatory. Just a shitty practice kept in place by nurses and shitty feminists.

2025-02-10 15:24:07 UTC

- reply

At least the right wing puritanism isn't gonna get my kids sterilized.

2025-02-06 12:06:11 UTC

- reply

Who wrote this?

2025-02-02 12:11:30 UTC

- reply

Me: Come on, Firefox' market share can't be this low
>quick online search
>it was 2.74 in August 2024
Oh my god... it is. Firefox is dying. Samsung's browser is close to passing it, and that's an Android only thing, and only on Samsung devices. Can't wait for the cope from the open source crowd.

2025-01-30 15:00:32 UTC

- reply

I'm getting the same repetitive issue in Europe, but I just assumed the ad market is small here, so there won't be much variety. And since US is bigger, this particular issue with internet ads might be just localized here. But maybe it's more common than I though.

2025-01-30 12:02:50 UTC

- reply

Step 1. Adblock
Step 2. Watch via mpv
Step 3. Download via yt-dlp
Step 4. ???
Step 5. Profit
They really don't seem to get it. The reason people do all this is because the ads they serve have become more obnoxious, more intrusive, and more stupid than TV ads. (not to mention the borderline illegal or scam ones).
I do remember the days when I was using an adblock extension, but I consciously chose to disable it for YouTube because the ads were tolerable, and I appreciated the site for what it offered.
I know what they could actually do to force people to watch ads, but it seems they're still too stupid to figure it out or implement it. They need to directly inject the ads into the video stream.

2025-01-28 16:53:26 UTC

- reply

Never played them, but they never seemed to be brilliant per say. More like the adventure game equivalent of Call of Duty. Fun enough to shut of your brain for a while, but not enough to get people properly invested. I don't think there are communities dedicating to speedrunning them, doing challange runs, modding them, or the various other things people do with games they love.

2025-01-20 15:54:59 UTC

- reply

Isn't HMD what was left of Nokia after Microsoft raped them?

2025-01-12 17:53:56 UTC

- reply

peak wallpaper material

2025-01-05 19:10:17 UTC

- reply

His delusions are literally trying to pull him out of his other delusions... absolutely amazing.

2024-12-26 18:51:48 UTC

- reply

Ever since I played around with lucid dreaming about 15 years ago, there's always a tiny bit of awareness in my dreams. It's why I can usually figure out "wait, you're not supposed to do that" when something stupid happens in the dream, before I wake up. And it's likely why I don't get something like hard drives speaking or being happy.
If something really crazy does happen, I basically realize it's a dream, and I instinctively start nudging the dream into rational territory.
But the downside to lucid dreaming for me has always been that such nudging also causes me to slowly wake up. Conscious interventions like "this didn't actually happen, I didn't actually wash my hard drives" work well to calm the nerves and turn a nightmare back into just a dream, but I just wake up fairly quickly after.

2024-12-25 13:58:59 UTC

Had a dream that I gave my hard drives a bath... literally dunked a dozen HDDs in a tub full of water. A few 2.5" ones somehow had a translucent case, and I could see them being half-filled with water.
What the hell was my brain thinking?! I don't even know if I can call this a dream or a nightmare. The whole thing was definitely shocking enough that, half-way through the dream, my brain realized "what the hell did I just do!". The rest of the dream was me trying to calculate what are the odds that if I let them dry out, that they'll work again.
All I can say is, I've never woken up and be more thankful that it was just a dream.

2024-12-22 19:13:33 UTC

- reply

And people wonder why I don't use Firefox.

2023-11-09 21:15:26 UTC

Contrary to popular opinion, I'm not dead. Sorry to disappoint.
Where was I? I decided to do an experiment. For the past year, I have used a different account, on another instance, under a different name. There I had a policy of not following anyone unless they followed me first, and following back anyone that followed me, no matter what. I wanted to see what's the worst that can happen, how toxic Fedi can become. I wanted to see Fedi unfiltered. I guess y'all didn't disappoint.
Some of you, I've stumbled upon again. Some I got the pleasure or displeasure of following again (because you followed me first). Some of you I barely got to talk to, and some not at all.
The experience started decent enough, the first half of the year was ok, but later on, the experience became unpleasant enough that I started opening Fedi rarer and used it less. In a way, that is a positive in itself, but there are better ways to quit social media. Turns out, if you just follow everybody on Fedi, your timeline has the potential of becoming useless trash very fast.
If you're curious about my alt identity, I'm sure you can find it. There are enough clues out there and I'm not planning on deleting that account or erasing any of my posts. But I will not name the account myself, and don't expect a confirmation from me if you confront me with it. Personally, I'm amazed no one made the connection already.
What will I do going forward? I don't really plan on coming back here, nor on continuing with my alt identity either. I might be here for a day or two, but I'm moving on. Where? Who knows. I'm not planning on telling anyone anyway.
I've met interesting people on Fedi, and I don't expect to forget them anytime soon. But, I don't see much usefulness in Fedi anymore. It was an exciting platform because I met people with views different (mostly more extreme) than what I've seen before. But this has grown stale. And since I prefer anonymity and fading away in a crowd, let's say that too many people for my tastes, on either account/identity, have come to know me.
So I'm gonna start from scratch somewhere else. I haven't even decided where yet, so don't ask.
I laughed with some of you, and I fought with others. I bear no ill will to anyone. I've seen plenty of you burdened with too much hate, so I hope you guys find enough happiness in your lives, so that you forget about hating. I hope all of you get to be happy.
Thank you Igel, [@Awoo](https://bae.st/users/Awoo ) and BigCums for introducing me to this world. I shall continue to awoo, drool over Asian waifus, and make big cums for as long as I live.
Goodbye for now. Have a good 2024!
Your friendly neighborhood, Half-Life loving Hinata waifu, signing out.
[@colonelj](https://freespeechextremist.com/users/colonelj )