dot

Congrats for the newsletter!!!
It's packed with bite-sized, easy-to-read updates and insights. It mixes top stories, quick news highlights, and in-depth editorials, all laid out in a clean, straightforward format. Perfect for staying updated without feeling overwhelmed.

2025-01-21 18:18:36 CET

- reply

Done.
Thanks for the zap ⚡

2025-01-13 22:33:11 CET

- reply

@nprofile…nryp

2025-01-13 22:32:46 CET

- reply

@nprofile…nryp

2025-01-13 22:32:24 CET

- reply

@nprofile…nryp

2025-01-13 22:32:01 CET

- reply

@nprofile…nryp

2025-01-13 22:31:21 CET

- reply

@nprofile…nryp

2025-01-13 22:30:37 CET

- reply

@nprofile…cfsv

2025-01-13 22:30:09 CET

- reply

@nprofile…cfsv

2025-01-13 04:06:10 CET

- reply

Thanks for the book

2025-01-04 01:41:56 CET

- reply

thank you!

2025-01-02 21:30:36 CET

- reply

El episodio que mas me ha gustado es el que va de Lyn Alden y sus razones de por qué invierte en bitcoin.
Se mostré a un par de conocidos bitcoiners que estan mas en plan "hippie", lo cual esta excelente, pero como a mi me interesan las inversiones, bueno, pues está muy bien y claro para exponer mi punto de vista, pero mejor de lo que yo lo haría.
Muchas gracias!
Sigan asi!

2024-12-28 00:15:08 CET

- reply

@nprofile…9h4s

2024-12-28 00:14:37 CET

- reply

@nprofile…9h4s

2024-12-28 00:12:35 CET

- reply

@nprofile…9h4s

2024-12-20 16:15:49 CET

- reply

@nprofile…uk2v

2024-12-20 16:15:29 CET

- reply

@nprofile…uk2v

2024-12-20 16:14:55 CET

- reply

@nprofile…uk2v

2024-12-20 16:13:57 CET

- reply

@nprofile…uk2v

2024-12-20 16:13:20 CET

- reply

@nprofile…uk2v

2024-12-20 16:12:19 CET

- reply

2024-12-14 19:58:48 CET

- reply

#hola

2024-12-12 21:51:43 CET

- reply

#hola

2024-12-07 22:32:14 CET

- reply

Thanks, good man! 🙏

2024-12-07 21:11:42 CET

- reply

I don't received any zap....
@nprofile…cfsv

2024-12-06 18:12:12 CET

gm ☕

2024-11-28 16:56:08 CET

- reply

@nprofile…yrqv because they share very important info about bitcoin en ESPAÑOL. This is very helpful.
Thank you!
#ZAPDEEZNUTS #BTCEDU

2024-11-21 14:25:31 CET

- reply

#ITDOESNTMATTER because the price issue is for those who have not understood bitcoin

2024-11-20 21:41:04 CET

- reply

@nprofile…k9u6

2024-11-20 21:40:28 CET

- reply

@nprofile…k9u6

2024-11-20 21:39:27 CET

- reply

@nprofile…k9u6

2024-11-20 21:38:49 CET

- reply

@nprofile…k9u6

2024-11-15 02:59:11 CET

- reply

Done

2024-11-15 00:19:40 CET

- reply

😄😄😄

2024-11-14 18:11:19 CET

- reply

2024-11-14 18:10:47 CET

Gm ☕

2024-11-13 01:02:34 CET

- reply

@nprofile…n2wv because they have one of the best community in Spanish language and a really great lighting network wallet.
I love him!

2024-11-12 19:27:27 CET

Gm ☕

2024-11-10 18:35:57 CET

- reply

I'm bullish AF cause NOTHING'S GONNA STOP US NOW

2024-11-10 17:05:09 CET

- reply

#zapDeezNutz

2024-11-10 17:03:01 CET

2024-11-06 20:58:43 CET

- reply

Nice!

2024-11-04 18:51:51 CET

- reply

Done

2024-10-24 19:10:25 CEST

- reply

Hola.
Una pregunta: el top de 3 Retweets, es acá o en Twitter?
Muchas gracias

2024-10-24 18:11:58 CEST

- reply

Muchas gracias. Son muy buenos los episodios!
@nprofile…e3fj

2024-10-24 18:10:00 CEST

- reply

Gracias Amiga

2024-10-24 18:09:14 CEST

- reply

Gm ☕

2024-10-11 00:17:44 CEST

- reply

Thanks!

2024-10-07 15:43:21 CEST

2024-10-04 06:28:31 CEST

- reply

HODL ⚡⚡⚡

2024-10-04 06:24:55 CEST

- reply

Hi. Welcome to nostr!

2024-10-04 04:35:45 CEST

- reply

You could organize a reading club about Bitcoin.
It occurs to me

2024-10-02 23:20:33 CEST

- reply

https://youtu.be/pWI5aVKvkCg?si=zFzwPjsOCxk2NKN9

2024-09-29 17:35:41 CEST

2024-09-27 01:32:29 CEST

- reply

@nprofile…cr4d , @nprofile…zz4y ⚡

2024-09-24 18:14:19 CEST

- reply

Done

2024-09-15 23:35:54 CEST

- reply

Thanks, good man !

2024-09-14 19:59:43 CEST

- reply

Me too.
Thank you!

2024-09-14 18:30:31 CEST

- reply

Pancho makes me smile because he walk on two legs 😄 https://image.nostr.build/5e7c692585bf84d98c2eefaab5f508905444272f4867b7a08f9885c487d7261b.jpg

2024-09-12 19:32:12 CEST

- reply

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better.
Samuel Beckett

2024-08-23 01:33:22 CEST

- reply

Hecho!
Muchos éxitos!!!

2024-05-29 18:48:29 CEST

- reply

Gm ☕

2024-05-24 22:04:15 CEST

https://image.nostr.build/e26c92b712c6c89ab0deda0dd730fa06eab4ad7b9831a1d086ce3179414aa236.jpg
State trajectories define the evolution of any element of the universe, and as such, constitue the record of effects that applied on it. But in the case of these strange attractors the notion of trajectory becomes meaningless. Any infinitely small variation in the definition of the element whose trajectory is investigated results in entirely different outcomes. As a result, the existence of edge-case systems for which the reduction of a continuous spectrum of possibles into definite, discrete elements with fixed properties results in a disappearing of our ability to define their trajectory of evolution and consequently seriously challenges the hard determinism of Laplace.

2024-05-24 21:56:21 CEST

Back to determinism and probabilities. What do strange attractors have to say about determinism? As described by Ilya Prigogine and Isabelle Stengers in their essay Entre le temps et l’éternité, these systems blur, or make disappear altogether, the causal link between causes and effects. Indeed, the notion of cause and effect presupposes the ability to define trajectories. https://image.nostr.build/fa7e110f095b913ed62c89294eebc99d85c94ab7d354d3f2dcb9168e1288acd4.jpg

2024-05-24 21:43:39 CEST

https://image.nostr.build/c35fa68cd1aefdbb3529a4eeb0bf7b431567c079ea53be47e42498f08a63108b.jpg
Strange attractors are dynamical systems that exhibit a set of states towards which the system converges that exhibits a fractal structure. Because most of them rely on chaotic dynamics, they display fascinating properties. Two points, no matter how arbitrarily close they originally are, will become arbitrarily far apart after enough iterations. Counter-intuitively, a global macroscopic structure that confines the attractor will also emerge from these same dynamics.

2024-05-24 21:34:17 CEST

This vision is very intuitive to me. As a human, my intellect (quite under-developed compared to the one described above) allows me to capture the mechanics between some causes and effects. If, for example, I press a light switch, I can guess pretty accurately what its future position will be. In other cases, the causes are unobservable, or too multiple for me, making any prediction on the effect unsurmontable; typically, I cannot predict the outcome of throwing a die.
This makes the definition of probability theory very empowering, and motivated me to study it in my Masters degree. With probabilies, we can seemingly overcome our causal blindness and learn directly about the world from the observed effects. In the case of the previous example, the assumption of a balanced die instruct us that the outcomes of a throw are equiprobable. This in turns allows us to infer properties about the effects that we might observe. We know for example that obtaining 5 times the same outcome in a row is very unlikely.
This hope for understanding the occurence of effects, despite our complete knowledge of causes is nevertheless hindered by chaotic dynamical systems.
https://image.nostr.build/fa7e110f095b913ed62c89294eebc99d85c94ab7d354d3f2dcb9168e1288acd4.jpg

2024-05-24 21:33:09 CEST

2024-05-24 21:27:32 CEST

In the early XIXe century, in its seminal essay Essai philosophique sur les probabilités, French mathematician Pierre-Simon de Laplace laid the foundation of probabilities as the theory for capturing the universe’s dynamics conditioned on our own inability to observe all of its machinery.
He envisioned that an intellect, that could at any moment know all the physical properties of every component of the universe, and all forces that apply to them, could predict perfectly both the future and past evolution of the universe. Recognising the inaccessibility of such knowledge in practice, he thereupon suggested to use probabilities to generate informed guesses on the occurence of future effects. This strongly ties his intuition to hard determinism, or linear causality; ∀e,∃C,e=f(C)
, with e
an effect and C
a set of causes.

2024-05-10 20:40:36 CEST

- reply

I'm very new here and I don't understand much, but I'm following many users, I think it's the only way to grow.

2024-05-10 20:36:58 CEST

https://image.nostr.build/8a3b329d685fc955f04555193d903c8c07e5eced7e26c8d1e995e9158472c518.jpg

2024-05-10 20:35:43 CEST

https://image.nostr.build/10bc778494ab6ff7f4d779a7c05d331c7da6570f6e403aefefd6b9d6a96d09bf.jpg

2024-05-10 20:34:28 CEST

https://image.nostr.build/259199d8d3c857703eae5a662982f41345a000eaa9c0445cbe596638fc1f454e.jpg