<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <updated></updated>
  <generator>https://nostr.ae</generator>

  <title>Nostr notes by </title>
  <author>
    <name></name>
  </author>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://nostr.ae/npub153t6xs8lxz5yjmjk56vzms29vs88v45qc3g6xg0kelzxyrvx2l3sh8y74t.rss" />
  <link href="https://nostr.ae/npub153t6xs8lxz5yjmjk56vzms29vs88v45qc3g6xg0kelzxyrvx2l3sh8y74t" />
  <id>https://nostr.ae/npub153t6xs8lxz5yjmjk56vzms29vs88v45qc3g6xg0kelzxyrvx2l3sh8y74t</id>
  <icon></icon>
  <logo></logo>




  <entry>
    <id>https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsxzc2hf5e057nneqeakc06yh0568qr9e60548m05awczsletdk28gzyzj90g6qluc2sjtw26nfstwpg4jquajksrz9rgep7m8ugcsdset7xp3tjgg</id>
    
      <title type="html">📅 Original date posted:2015-01-21 📝 Original ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsxzc2hf5e057nneqeakc06yh0568qr9e60548m05awczsletdk28gzyzj90g6qluc2sjtw26nfstwpg4jquajksrz9rgep7m8ugcsdset7xp3tjgg" />
    <content type="html">
      In reply to &lt;a href=&#39;/nevent1qqspkygvcv5has9vc4chau9tr9rrqntw7za95am4q46yr6gzthtzq3qaxlnm2&#39;&gt;nevent1q…lnm2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;_________________________&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;📅 Original date posted:2015-01-21&lt;br/&gt;📝 Original message:I&amp;#39;m really glad to see this proposal.  We already treat non-DER&lt;br/&gt;signatures as non-standard in btcd and agree that extending them be&lt;br/&gt;illegal as a part of a soft fork is a smart and sane thing to do.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It&amp;#39;s also good to see the explicit use of signature parsing since it&lt;br/&gt;matches what we already do as well because we noticed noticed OpenSSL&amp;#39;s&lt;br/&gt;notion of big numbers (unsigned) didn&amp;#39;t agree with Go&amp;#39;s (signed).  By&lt;br/&gt;having the explicit signature scheme and checking clearly called out in&lt;br/&gt;a BIP, it greatly lowers the chances of there being any disagreement&lt;br/&gt;about what is valid or invalid due to an underlying dependency.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&#43;1&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;On 1/20/2015 6:35 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; Hello everyone,&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; We&amp;#39;ve been aware of the risk of depending on OpenSSL for consensus&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; rules for a while, and were trying to get rid of this as part of BIP&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; 62 (malleability protection), which was however postponed due to&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; unforeseen complexities. The recent evens (see the thread titled&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; &amp;#34;OpenSSL 1.0.0p / 1.0.1k incompatible, causes blockchain rejection.&amp;#34;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; on this mailing list) have made it clear that the problem is very&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; real, however, and I would prefer to have a fundamental solution for&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; it sooner rather than later.&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; I therefore propose a softfork to make non-DER signatures illegal&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; (they&amp;#39;ve been non-standard since v0.8.0). A draft BIP text can be&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; found on:&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt;     &lt;a href=&#34;https://gist.github.com/sipa/5d12c343746dad376c80&#34;&gt;https://gist.github.com/sipa/5d12c343746dad376c80&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; The document includes motivation and specification. In addition, an&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; implementation (including unit tests derived from the BIP text) can be&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; found on:&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt;     &lt;a href=&#34;https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/commit/bipstrictder&#34;&gt;https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/commit/bipstrictder&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; Comments/criticisms are very welcome, but I&amp;#39;d prefer keeping the&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; discussion here on the mailinglist (which is more accessible than on&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; the gist).&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;-------------- next part --------------&lt;br/&gt;A non-text attachment was scrubbed...&lt;br/&gt;Name: signature.asc&lt;br/&gt;Type: application/pgp-signature&lt;br/&gt;Size: 834 bytes&lt;br/&gt;Desc: OpenPGP digital signature&lt;br/&gt;URL: &amp;lt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150121/8834b942/attachment.sig&amp;gt&#34;&gt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150121/8834b942/attachment.sig&amp;gt&lt;/a&gt;;
    </content>
    <updated>2023-06-07T15:28:54Z</updated>
  </entry>

</feed>