<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <updated></updated>
  <generator>https://nostr.ae</generator>

  <title>Nostr notes by </title>
  <author>
    <name></name>
  </author>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://nostr.ae/npub16hal6zv9pjknpwvm2vauaq7zuhkpjahd3zgah0u50wcrwdn6z7vs9zepvl.rss" />
  <link href="https://nostr.ae/npub16hal6zv9pjknpwvm2vauaq7zuhkpjahd3zgah0u50wcrwdn6z7vs9zepvl" />
  <id>https://nostr.ae/npub16hal6zv9pjknpwvm2vauaq7zuhkpjahd3zgah0u50wcrwdn6z7vs9zepvl</id>
  <icon></icon>
  <logo></logo>




  <entry>
    <id>https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqs0y4mz6zethktn60dd6729gqnwcmj43jv63p04npc9wmpxytr5ftczyr2lhlgfs5x26v9endfnhn5rctj7cxtkakyfrkalj3amqdek0gtejjz0veg</id>
    
      <title type="html">📅 Original date posted:2017-02-25 📝 Original message:On ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqs0y4mz6zethktn60dd6729gqnwcmj43jv63p04npc9wmpxytr5ftczyr2lhlgfs5x26v9endfnhn5rctj7cxtkakyfrkalj3amqdek0gtejjz0veg" />
    <content type="html">
      In reply to &lt;a href=&#39;/nevent1qqsd9kauwlcxtawdlshh23r2venhfga4p80fmlgkd3fkjyvytz00x4gcexkau&#39;&gt;nevent1q…xkau&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;_________________________&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;📅 Original date posted:2017-02-25&lt;br/&gt;📝 Original message:On 02/25/2017 08:10 AM, Ethan Heilman via bitcoin-dev wrote:&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;SHA1 is insecure because the SHA1 algorithm is insecure, not because&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; 160bits isn&amp;#39;t enough.&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; I would argue that 160-bits isn&amp;#39;t enough for collision resistance.&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; Assuming RIPEMD-160(SHA-256(msg)) has no flaws (i.e. is a random&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; oracle), collisions can be generated in 2^80 queries (actually detecting&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; these collisions requires some time-memory additional trade-offs). The&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; Bitcoin network at the current hash rate performs roughly SHA-256 ~2^78&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; queries a day or 2^80 queries every four days.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You have to not only produce a ripemd160 collision, you have to produce &lt;br/&gt;a collision that is also a valid sha-256 hash - and that&amp;#39;s much much &lt;br/&gt;much more difficult.
    </content>
    <updated>2023-06-07T17:56:42Z</updated>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsv3pv78gqml7krl945vu4r3pnnr7pvlkhl2cshrn796rcg3mkhhyqzyr2lhlgfs5x26v9endfnhn5rctj7cxtkakyfrkalj3amqdek0gtejq86tl8</id>
    
      <title type="html">📅 Original date posted:2016-12-19 📝 Original message:On ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsv3pv78gqml7krl945vu4r3pnnr7pvlkhl2cshrn796rcg3mkhhyqzyr2lhlgfs5x26v9endfnhn5rctj7cxtkakyfrkalj3amqdek0gtejq86tl8" />
    <content type="html">
      In reply to &lt;a href=&#39;/nevent1qqsgr8a3gnet3s8fpqqc4c9fvkaeh8rec4kz67uksc9gqqhs43k9t6szsxguw&#39;&gt;nevent1q…xguw&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;_________________________&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;📅 Original date posted:2016-12-19&lt;br/&gt;📝 Original message:On 12/18/2016 12:51 PM, Douglas Roark via bitcoin-dev wrote:&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; On 2016/12/18 12:07, Alice Wonder via bitcoin-dev wrote:&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; I almost did not update to 0.13.0 because the test suite was failing due&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; to python errors. How to fix them was posted on bitcointalk.&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; 0.13.1 came with new python errors in the test suite. So I just said&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; fuck it.&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; When the test suite actually works in my fairly standard environment&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; (CentOS) in the distributed release, I will upgrade.&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; Can you post more info about the problems you&amp;#39;re seeing, how you fixed&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; them, your environment, etc., or at least post an issue on Github? I&amp;#39;m&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; sure somebody would be happy to help. Some info on how to reproduce the&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; problems would be very helpful. :)&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; Thanks.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For 0.13.0 I had to do&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;export LANG=en_US.utf8&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;before running the test suite. I build in clean chroot build environment &lt;br/&gt;to avoid accidental linking to non-standard libraries, and in that &lt;br/&gt;environment the LANG is normally set to C as LANG normally doesn&amp;#39;t &lt;br/&gt;matter for compiling software that is expected to run regardless of what &lt;br/&gt;the LANG is.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That I believe was fixed in 0.13.1.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In 0.13.1 the error is&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Running test/bitcoin-util-test.py...&lt;br/&gt;Traceback (most recent call last):&lt;br/&gt;   File &amp;#34;./test/bitcoin-util-test.py&amp;#34;, line 12, in &amp;lt;module&amp;gt;&lt;br/&gt;     &amp;#34;bitcoin-util-test.json&amp;#34;,buildenv)&lt;br/&gt;   File &amp;#34;/builddir/build/BUILD/bitcoin-0.13.1/src/test/bctest.py&amp;#34;, line &lt;br/&gt;54, in bctester&lt;br/&gt;     bctest(testDir, testObj, buildenv.exeext)&lt;br/&gt;   File &amp;#34;/builddir/build/BUILD/bitcoin-0.13.1/src/test/bctest.py&amp;#34;, line &lt;br/&gt;26, in bctest&lt;br/&gt;     outputData = open(testDir &#43; &amp;#34;/&amp;#34; &#43; outputFn).read()&lt;br/&gt;FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: &lt;br/&gt;&amp;#39;./test/data/blanktx.json&amp;#39;&lt;br/&gt;make[3]: *** [check-local] Error 1&lt;br/&gt;make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/bitcoin-0.13.1/src&amp;#39;&lt;br/&gt;make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2&lt;br/&gt;make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/bitcoin-0.13.1/src&amp;#39;&lt;br/&gt;make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1&lt;br/&gt;make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/bitcoin-0.13.1/src&amp;#39;&lt;br/&gt;make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;0.13.0 test works just fine (once the LANG is set to something utf8)
    </content>
    <updated>2023-06-07T17:55:01Z</updated>
  </entry>

</feed>