📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23 📝 Original message:On ...

2023-06-07T17:19:19+02:00

In reply to nevent1q…e844
_________________________

📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23
📝 Original message:On 04/23/2014 06:28 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Tails users usually can't really build it from source— talks is a live
> boot mostly stateless linux distribution for privacy applications.
> It's really good in general.
>
> I agree that we shouldn't be statically linking QT on linux generally
> (due to things like theming), though maybe we could just have the
> build process dump out a seperate extra static QT binary just for
> these other cases? I feel like the work maintaining it would be less
> than what we've had in answering questions/complaints about it.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dumping out a separate, extra static QT binary is a great idea.

📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23 📝 Original message:On ...

2023-06-07T17:19:17+02:00

In reply to nevent1q…hsgw
_________________________

📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23
📝 Original message:On 04/22/2014 09:30 AM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
> Bitcoin-Translators mailing list is an announce-only mailing list for
> developers to communicate to translators at particular times when new
> translations are needed. Replies and discussion would go to the
> bitcoin dev list. Subscriptions to this list would additionally be
> valuable to the project as it allows for a convenient way to ask for
> translations of other related projects like bitcoin.org
> <http://bitcoin.org>; that are hosted on theTransifex platform.
> Whenever source strings of significance are changed or deadlines are
> announced, translators will learn of work to be done in Transifex
> quickly as they will all be subscribed to this announce list.
> Discussion of translation issues should be on the Bitcoin-Development
> list.
>
> Development Roadmap of Bitcoin Core 0.9.2
>
> The Bitcoin Core developers have a desire to do a mostly bug-fix and
> translation update release in v0.9.2. A feature and string freeze will
> start about 3 weeks from now.
>
>
> The purpose of this development roadmap is to communicate the project
> intent and to better organize volunteers. Hopefully doing so will make
> clear when particular types of contributions are most welcome and help
> to push the release process forward in a more timely manner while also
> improving the quality of the release. Missing a target goal is OK.
> The developers may decide to delay particular goals if there are good
> reasons on a case-by-case basis. While schedules may slip, it is
> generally a good thing for a goal to have existed.
>
>
> Schedule (subject to change)
>
> 13 May 2014:Feature freeze. Source string freeze. Release candidate.
>
> 20 May 2014: Testing of a release candidate is roughly a week. More
> time can be added at the discretion of the developers to allow for
> testing if further release candidates are deemed necessary due to
> subsequent changes.
>
>
> Nightly Gitian Builds
>
> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=571414.0
>
> To make it easier for non-developers and translators to get involved
> in testing unofficial deterministic nightly builds are now available.
>
>
> Warren Togami

I see that the latest nightly build (thanks for that, Warren) is still
not compatible with Tails/Debian Squeeze. Is there still an intention to
address this issue? Might it be fixed by 0.9.2?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140423/1be17057/attachment.html>;

Nostr notes by

📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23 📝 Original message:On ...

📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23 📝 Original message:On ...