<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <updated></updated>
  <generator>https://nostr.ae</generator>

  <title>Nostr notes by </title>
  <author>
    <name></name>
  </author>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://nostr.ae/npub1klewdf7pgv8c799xdxzegp2auv94vjfnvp7zr4nt7sxc5sc2ndtsa82k6r.rss" />
  <link href="https://nostr.ae/npub1klewdf7pgv8c799xdxzegp2auv94vjfnvp7zr4nt7sxc5sc2ndtsa82k6r" />
  <id>https://nostr.ae/npub1klewdf7pgv8c799xdxzegp2auv94vjfnvp7zr4nt7sxc5sc2ndtsa82k6r</id>
  <icon></icon>
  <logo></logo>




  <entry>
    <id>https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsqt2fhxnqu6rtu73den2gnl04swp8u78ywxktteawt8d0j9h6xfdszyzml9e48c9pslrc55e5ct9q9th3sk4jfxds8cgwkd06qmzjrp2d4wdzpmpn</id>
    
      <title type="html">@nprofile…l59c It seems all the benefits of Xona could be ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsqt2fhxnqu6rtu73den2gnl04swp8u78ywxktteawt8d0j9h6xfdszyzml9e48c9pslrc55e5ct9q9th3sk4jfxds8cgwkd06qmzjrp2d4wdzpmpn" />
    <content type="html">
      In reply to &lt;a href=&#39;/nevent1qqsqqwem4uhdttdemnuu57l2u6v2st3fd0skfyngaf9rhqx7rpxlh7spzamhxue69uhkummnw3ezuarhd9hxkmr99ekx7mqkccr7l&#39;&gt;nevent1q…cr7l&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;_________________________&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;span itemprop=&#34;mentions&#34; itemscope itemtype=&#34;https://schema.org/Person&#34;&gt;&lt;a itemprop=&#34;url&#34; href=&#34;/nprofile1qythwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytn5wa5ku6mvv5hxcmmvqqsp85kvd75eg55fsg2nay9ducp6n649dsxj8twxdjlt82vcx0v2stgdel59c&#34; class=&#34;bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1&#34;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Ars Technica&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span class=&#34;italic&#34;&gt;nprofile…l59c&lt;/span&gt;)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; It seems all the benefits of Xona could be achieved by replacing the current GPS satellites with ones with more powerful transmitters. Or am I missing something fundamental with their plan?
    </content>
    <updated>2026-07-16T15:05:19Z</updated>
  </entry>

</feed>