https://nostr.ae https://nostr.ae/npub1lwk885jp853atdhxp0zrz9fqdxvpu44ffn2avfkfaz9kczsce02s5vyywk https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsdhvu059530tqwjtudrsdpcgazyskjlklj0s43hwtn5anmuf69jxszyra6cu7jgy7j84dkuc9ugvg4yp5es8jk49xdt43xe85gkmq2rr9a2czkzdl In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqs9xq9hsr9342hllhe4tea6jsqg02hv3rtxdqtrgd6nu5zymnjapeqmtmxgp'>nevent1q…mxgp</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>📅 Original date posted:2015-07-22<br/>📝 Original message:An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br/>URL: &lt;<a href="http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150722/282f6685/attachment.html&gt">http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150722/282f6685/attachment.html&gt</a>; 2023-06-07T17:43:07+02:00 https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsyhv4lhfkw8kth22krvs4f5884m7w5w6csm0u6as78h3s2p3dcmrgzyra6cu7jgy7j84dkuc9ugvg4yp5es8jk49xdt43xe85gkmq2rr9a2capvh5 In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqswkh37f2r5g8m66khepynrwpk00rhfuvyh63l47hahk8mfqtegk9gvcx4up'>nevent1q…x4up</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>📅 Original date posted:2015-07-17<br/>📝 Original message:An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br/>URL: &lt;<a href="http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150717/719347de/attachment.html&gt">http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150717/719347de/attachment.html&gt</a>; 2023-06-07T17:42:36+02:00 https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsvfdsusc84nn2hegr9m3gxmadd4n05ek2cth90ayrpmknhxwphnuczyra6cu7jgy7j84dkuc9ugvg4yp5es8jk49xdt43xe85gkmq2rr9a2r73se9 In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqsd7z0lk8y5gw6grmj275cz7rsgc8aqxfjjtruf9emgmzplcdy2zdqtmx2sr'>nevent1q…x2sr</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>📅 Original date posted:2015-06-28<br/>📝 Original message:An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br/>URL: &lt;<a href="http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150627/3f441f1e/attachment.html&gt">http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150627/3f441f1e/attachment.html&gt</a>; 2023-06-07T17:40:53+02:00 https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqs87v46z4czehpw5vr8smhvkrryaprnmvfu23x2z83gd6vqvulas5qzyra6cu7jgy7j84dkuc9ugvg4yp5es8jk49xdt43xe85gkmq2rr9a20ap9aa In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqsrhkjrnqrxev9c30qvv5m8ettrgnvwawj0fnzs0fdxkry6zwels8sp59ve2'>nevent1q…9ve2</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>📅 Original date posted:2015-05-08<br/>📝 Original message:It seems to me all this would do is encourage 0-transaction blocks, crippling the network. Individual blocks don&#39;t have a &#34;maximum&#34; block size, they have an actual block size. Rational miners would pick blocks to minimize difficulty, lowering the &#34;effective&#34; maximum block size as defined by the optimal size for rational miners. This would be a tragedy of the commons.<br/><br/>In addition to that, average block cinfirmation time, and hence rate of inflation of the bitcoin currency, would now be subject to manipulation. This undermined a core value of Bitcoin.<br/><br/>&gt; On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Mark Friedenbach &lt;mark at friedenbach.org&gt; wrote:<br/>&gt;<br/>&gt;   * For each block, the miner is allowed to select a different difficulty (nBits) within a certain range, e.g. +/- 25% of the expected difficulty, and this miner-selected difficulty is used for the proof of work check. In addition to adjusting the hashcash target, selecting a different difficulty also raises or lowers the maximum block size for that block by a function of the difference in difficulty. 2023-06-07T17:34:12+02:00