Nostr notes by

Mad

2026-03-24T03:05:08Z

In reply to nevent1q…e7k7
_________________________

Mad

Bitcoin has a more flexible range of energy sources tho. Bit more ...

2026-03-12T11:44:47Z

In reply to nevent1q…8xym
_________________________

Bitcoin has a more flexible range of energy sources tho. Bit more of a houdini.
Headwinds for AI are they are usually in urban sprawls with reliable power (they’re up against city grids and resources for people), whilst we can mine bitcoin in a jungle or some shit

Agreed.

2026-03-08T11:37:16Z

In reply to nevent1q…6xzg
_________________________

Agreed.

I understand

2026-02-26T20:27:36Z

In reply to nevent1q…9me0
_________________________

I understand

“Unearned knowledge”. C’mon man, Bitcoin is for everyone, ...

2026-02-26T12:44:38Z

In reply to nevent1q…vwge
_________________________

“Unearned knowledge”. C’mon man, Bitcoin is for everyone, that’s the point. Getting to first principles is a part of the path.
I agree that there’s terrible takes and ideas, that’s also a part of being in a free market - bad ideas that don’t create value eventually get rekt.

Sound money being accessible to everyone regardless of sophistication or whatever **is** the value proposition.

Slay

2026-02-21T10:10:42Z

In reply to nevent1q…m58g
_________________________

Slay

**The Securitized Time Hypothesis: Fiscal Dominance as ...

2026-02-20T11:58:00Z

In reply to nevent1q…flu3
_________________________

**The Securitized Time Hypothesis: Fiscal Dominance as Political-Economic Constraint and Bitcoin as Contingent Structural Hedge**

---

## Abstract

The structural instability of the 2020s emanates from a monetary regime in which sovereign debt functions as the securitization of future human labor—creating a political economy where intergenerational wealth extraction represents a path-dependent equilibrium rather than transient policy distortion. This analysis demonstrates that reform faces severe political-economic friction due to three reinforcing constraints: collateral dependency, debt service arithmetic under growth uncertainty, and demographic-political capture. The system appears trapped between deflationary collapse (ice) and perpetual monetary expansion (fire), where ice is politically improbable and fire is institutionally incentivized by fiscal dominance pressures. Bitcoin’s emergence as a potential exit from this constraint set represents not deterministic replacement but contingent structural evolution—a coalition forming through infrastructure and self-interest rather than coordination or conviction, progressing through distinct volatility and collateral phases.

---

## I. The Empirical Base: The Post-1971 Divergence

The divergence is measurable but causally complex.

**The Wage-Productivity Decoupling:**
From 1947 through 1971, real GDP per capita, productivity (GDP per FTE), and real median weekly earnings tracked together [Confirmed]. Post-1973, real GDP per capita rose approximately 270% from baseline (index 370) while real median weekly earnings stagnated near 170-180 [Confirmed] (Bivens & Mishel, 2015) https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613415592515. However, the attribution to the Nixon shock exclusively [Theoretical] requires qualification: measurement divergences between CPI and output deflators explain approximately one-third of the gap, with composition effects (workforce demographic shifts) and within-labor inequality explaining additional variation [Emerging] (Stansbury & Summers, 2020) https://doi.org/10.3386/w27595 (*n=2,847; cross-sectional time series; non-industry-funded; replicated with modifications*).

**The Financialization Mechanism:**
What partially replaced the wage channel was the asset channel. In Australian equity markets, financials grew from negligible market capitalization share in the 1970s to rival resources by the 2020s [Confirmed] (RBA, 2023). The causal mechanism—monetary transmission through collateral inflation rather than wage growth [Emerging]—finds support in BIS financial cycle literature (Drehmann et al., 2022) https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12916, though supply constraints (zoning, construction productivity) operate as co-determinants (*n=OECD panel 1980-2020; VAR analysis; central bank funding; replicated*).

**The Housing Transmission:**
In Australian capital cities, median house price multiples moved from 3× annual income (1981) to 13× in Sydney and 10× in Melbourne (2023) [Confirmed] (RBA, 2023) https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/bulletin/2023/mar/housing-accessibility-for-first-home-buyers.html. US data shows parallel trajectories. This represents a monetary architecture problem expressing through housing [Emerging], though not exclusively; land-use regulation and tax treatment remain confounding variables.

The arrow on the charts points to a structural shift circa 1971: **the architecture changed, and the distribution of productivity gains changed with it**, though through multiple causal channels rather than single shock determinism.

---

## II. The Mechanism: Debt as Securitized Future Labor

### The Core Insight

When a government issues a bond, it creates a tradeable claim on future labor productivity—specifically, on the tax revenue extracted from future economic output [Theoretical]. When a central bank monetizes that bond through balance sheet expansion, it performs two simultaneous operations:

1. **Dilutes existing stored labor** — the savings of non-asset-holding cohorts lose purchasing power as the monetary base expands [Confirmed] (Fischer et al., 2023) https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.2021.1234
2. **Reflates the collateral base** — asset holders see collateral appreciate as new money flows preferentially into financialized assets [Emerging] (Joyce et al., 2012) https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.4.53 (*n=event studies; central bank funding; unreplicated across heterogeneous economies*)

This is not coincidental but represents the designed transmission mechanism: wages as production cost to be minimized, assets as collateral requiring inflation to maintain credit system solvency [Theoretical].

### The Reflexive Trap

Each cycle of monetary expansion widens the gap between those positioned proximate to monetary creation (financial sector, asset holders) and those dependent on flow-based labor income (wage earners) [Emerging]. The younger middle class faces structural constraints: they cannot accumulate deposits without servicing rent (transferring scarcity value to incumbent asset holders), and entry at current multiples (8-13× income) requires decades of debt servitude [Confirmed].

**This is not a bug but a path-dependent equilibrium of the system operating as designed.**

---

## III. The Trap: Three Political-Economic Constraints

Reform faces severe friction not due to mechanical impossibility but to path-dependent political-economic constraints that make voluntary adjustment improbable.

### Constraint 1: Collateral Dependency (The Load-Bearing Structure)

Residential real estate underpins:
- Banking system balance sheets (primary collateral for credit creation) [Confirmed]
- Retirement savings of incumbent cohorts (superannuation, 401k exposure) [Confirmed]
- Government fiscal positions (stamp duty, capital gains tax) [Confirmed]

Deflation of housing values triggers bank insolvency risk, retirement account destruction, and fiscal crisis [Emerging] (Mian & Sufi, 2014) https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226081946.001.0001. This creates a one-way ratchet where credit must expand to prevent collateral base deflation [Theoretical], though macroprudential tools (dynamic provisioning) post-2008 complicate pure mechanical determinism [Dated source—context evolved] (BIS, 2024) https://www.bis.org/publ/work1198.htm (*monetary authority—financial stability mandate*; bias-adjusted).

### Constraint 2: Debt Service Arithmetic Under Growth Uncertainty (The Binding Constraint)

Global debt stock exceeds $200 trillion (US sovereign $36T). Servicing requires nominal growth to generate tax revenue [Confirmed]. The claim that resource constraints prevent real growth necessary to prevent political backlash [Speculative] relies on grey literature projections (Michaux, 2022) conflicting with USGS assessments of reserve growth through substitution (USGS, 2024) https://doi.org/10.3133/mcs2024. While "green growth" faces physical limits [Emerging], historical decoupling of GDP from resource throughput (Haberl et al., 2020) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909389117 (*n=global panel 1990-2017; ecological economics; contested*) suggests the arithmetic closure is contingent rather than absolute.

### Constraint 3: Political Economy (The Capture Mechanism)

The political system exhibits demographic skew: median age of parliamentary representatives exceeds 50, with voting participation and campaign finance concentration among asset-holding cohorts [Confirmed]. Reform requires voluntary acceptance of asset deflation by politically dominant groups—historically improbable [Emerging], though punctuated equilibrium models suggest crisis-induced phase transitions remain possible [Theoretical] (Baumgartner & Jones, 2009) https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226034782.001.0001.

**The architecture is self-reinforcing for political-economic reasons rather than mechanical locks.** Exit requires accepting collapse that the system will delay through continued expansion.

---

## IV. Fire vs Ice: Contingent Probabilities in Fiscal Dominance

The system faces a binary risk distribution:
- **Death by ice** (deflationary collapse): Debt cannot be serviced → credit contracts → demand collapses
- **Death by fire** (QE infinity): Debt cannot be serviced → monetary expansion → currency debasement

### Why Ice is Politically Improbable

Ice requires acceptance of mass unemployment, depression-level contraction, and wealth destruction by asset-holding majorities [Emerging]. Historical precedent (Weimar, 2008, 2020) demonstrates preference for expansion [Confirmed], though institutional innovations in debt restructuring (Brunnermeier et al., 2021) https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181175 provide theoretical alternatives to pure binary choice.

### Why Fire is Institutionally Incentivized

Fire becomes probable when:
- Debt service requires nominal growth [Confirmed]
- Deflation is politically unacceptable [Emerging]
- Expansion preserves collateral values [Theoretical]

The Miran document (Strategic Capital, 2024) outlines fiscal dominance tools: devaluation, monetization, financial repression [Tier 4 grey literature; *asset management—fiscal monetization advocacy*; bias-adjusted upward 10-15% on severity estimates]. These represent institutional preferences rather than thermodynamic necessities.

**This is institutional incentive structure, not thermodynamic law.** Fire is probable given political constraints, not inevitable given resource physics.

---

## V. The Social Consequence: Polarization as System Exhaust

Polarization functions as effect rather than cause. The causal chain proceeds: material deterioration (wage/productivity decoupling) → perceived intergenerational compact closure → blocked economic policy channels (both parties defend collateral values) → grievance migration to cultural/ideological channels [Emerging].

**Polarization is what happens when legitimate material frustration has nowhere productive to go.** It is emergent rather than engineered: when economic grievance is blocked, energy flows to available channels (universities offering cultural narratives, media offering anti-globalist narratives), both operating within institutions captured by extraction mechanisms [Theoretical].

---

## VI. Bitcoin as Contingent Structural Hedge: The Three-Phase Model

Against this backdrop, movement toward Bitcoin represents rational response to perceived extraction mechanisms and blocked political channels [Emerging]. It is not deterministic replacement but contingent evolution through distinct phases:

**Phase 3: Volatility Sponge (Current) [Emerging]**
Bitcoin currently functions as high-beta liquidity barometer, correlating with monetary expansion during QE and contracting during tightening. At this stage, it operates as monetary derivative of global liquidity, externalizing volatility before it reaches wages. This builds infrastructure and creates optionality for subsequent phases.

**Phase 2: Irreducible Collateral Layer (Approaching) [Speculative]**
If expansion persists and sovereign debt quality degrades, capital may seek neutral collateral. Bitcoin offers: instant settlement (Lightning), verifiability (on-chain transparency), portability (seed phrases), and jurisdictional diversification [Emerging].

Volatility compression data shows decline from >100% annualized (2013) to ~40% (2024) [Confirmed] (CoinMetrics, 2024). If this trajectory continues, Bitcoin approaches the <25% annualized volatility threshold hypothesized for reserve collateral status [Speculative].

*Criticality caveat*: Post-ETF approval (January 2024), Bitcoin volatility exhibits structural breaks correlating with traditional risk assets (S&P 500 correlation 0.6+ during stress), potentially undermining neutral collateral thesis [Emerging].

**Phase 1: Base Layer Settlement (Contingent on Trust Failure) [Speculative]**
Transition to monetary base requires:
- Severe degradation of sovereign credibility beyond inflation to trust failure [Speculative]
- Rising capital controls and financial repression [Emerging]
- Settlement neutrality exceeding stability preference [Theoretical]

This phase is contingent on geopolitical-scale trust breakdown, not merely financial stress. Historical base layer transitions occur during wars or reserve currency shifts [Confirmed].

### The Power-Law Evidence (Qualified)

The Gold-to-BTC market capitalization ratio has declined from ~10⁷ to ~15 over 15 years [Confirmed]. However, the claimed power-law convergence (R² = 0.96) [Speculative] suffers from small-sample overfitting (n=15 annual observations) and survivorship bias (exclusion of failed cryptocurrencies). High R² in asset price regression does not imply structural necessity; spurious correlations in financial time series are ubiquitous (*n=15; single asset; overfitting risk*).

Historical volatility compression patterns suggest:
- 3-month forward: positive outcomes probable but not guaranteed [Speculative]
- Resolution of compression historically upward but not deterministic [Emerging]

### What Bitcoin Offers Structurally [Emerging]

Fixed supply outside sovereign bond issuance cycles [Confirmed]. Labor stored in Bitcoin is not diluted by quantitative easing. It does not require bank collateral assessment or trap holders in 30-year amortization at 10× income multiples.

For cohorts locked out of housing wealth accumulation, this represents a structural hedge against fiscal dominance [Emerging], not risk-free alternative. Volatility is real; the relevant comparison is Bitcoin against 20-year deposit timelines followed by mortgage servitude in a collateral system requiring perpetual expansion [Theoretical].

---

## VII. The Coalition Through Infrastructure (Emergent, Not Inevitable)

### Bitcoin as Emergent Coalition

Traditional revolutionary frameworks require consciousness → organization → coordination → victory. Bitcoin bypasses this through individual action and infrastructure:

**The mechanism [Emerging]:**
1. Demand for better payment rails (stablecoins demonstrate product-market fit) [Confirmed]
2. Stablecoin scaling faces technical constraints on current platforms (Ethereum/Tron dominance at 90%+ market share) [Confirmed] (CoinMetrics, 2024)
3. Bitcoin settlement infrastructure offers alternative architecture (HTLCs on Lightning) [Emerging]
4. Users accumulate Bitcoin through infrastructure (yield products, payment routing) [Emerging]
5. Network effects compound [Theoretical]

**No coordination required; path dependence and self-interest suffice.**

### The Stablecoin Dependency (Contingent)

Current stablecoin platforms (Ethereum, Tron) face scaling constraints (block congestion, fee spikes) [Confirmed]. The "gas token problem" is partially solved via account abstraction on Ethereum [Dated source—context evolved].

Bitcoin offers settlement without gas tokens and atomic routing [Emerging], though current stablecoin dominance on Ethereum/Tron contradicts claims of technical necessity for Bitcoin rails [Confirmed].

Tether's investment in Bitcoin mining represents reserve diversification (*stablecoin issuer—reserve diversification mandate*; bias-adjusted), not absolute technical dependency.

### The Coinbase Mechanism (Product Design, Not Structural Law)

Coinbase One offers USDC yield paid in Bitcoin (3.5% APY) [Confirmed]. This converts fiat yield-seeking into Bitcoin accumulation through product design [Emerging], not mechanical necessity. Competitive replication is probable but not guaranteed.

**The coalition forms through infrastructure and self-interest [Emerging], not because it must, but because current incentives align toward Bitcoin rails as one solution among constrained options.**

---

## VIII. Why the System Cannot Fully Stop This (Limited Effectiveness)

**States can [Confirmed]:**
- Regulate custody providers
- Tax capital gains
- Introduce compliance frameworks
- Launch CBDCs

**States cannot easily [Emerging]:**
- Confiscate self-custody (private keys resist remote seizure)
- Prevent atomic swaps (Lightning routing is censorship-resistant)
- Stop global adoption (borderless protocol)
- Reverse network effects post-critical mass [Speculative]

**CBDCs may accelerate rather than prevent adoption [Emerging]:** Programmable fiat with surveillance features makes Bitcoin's censorship-resistance more attractive, clarifying the choice between state-controlled and neutral money.

**Financialization paradox [Emerging]:** Bringing Bitcoin into regulated systems (ETFs, bank custody) captures some within traditional rails but legitimizes the asset, making banning politically harder once Basel III treatment establishes systemic status.

---

## IX. Terminal vs Cyclical: Contingent on Resource and Institutional Trajectories

### Previous Cycles Had Exits

**1971 cycle:** Resources available for expansion; could "grow out" [Confirmed].
**2008 cycle:** Resources available for reflation; balance sheet expansion possible [Confirmed].
**2020s cycle:** Faces debt trap and potential resource constraints [Emerging].

Whether this cycle is terminal [Speculative] or cyclical [Emerging] depends on:
- Resource substitution elasticity (USGS reserve revisions vs. Michaux constraints) [Active controversy]
- Institutional innovation in debt restructuring [Emerging]
- Political capacity for fiscal consolidation (historically rare but extant) [Confirmed]

**The financial claims may exceed physical capacity to honor them [Speculative], or decoupling/service-sector growth may provide nominal exit [Emerging].** If resource constraints bind absolutely, fire scenario makes Bitcoin adoption probable through infrastructure; if substitution succeeds, Bitcoin remains hedge rather than necessity.

---

## X. Epistemic Status and Falsifiability

**[Confirmed]:**
- Productivity-wage divergence post-1971 (Federal Reserve, BLS; *replicated*)
- Housing unaffordability as monetary phenomenon with supply constraints (RBA, Grattan Institute; *replicated*)
- Credit expansion as structural requirement for collateral maintenance (BIS; *replicated*)
- Bitcoin 21M cap immutability and halving mechanics (*verified on-chain*)

**[Emerging]:**
- Bitcoin power-law convergence with gold (*n=15 years; trend observed; causal mechanism unverified*)
- Volatility compression pattern (*CoinMetrics data; trajectory clear but not guaranteed*)
- Polarization as consequence of blocked economic grievance (*political economy literature; causal mechanism not formally isolated*)
- Stablecoin technical dependency on Bitcoin rails (*theoretical; current network data contradicts dominance*)
- Infrastructure coalition formation (*observed in fintech; scaling uncertain*)

**[Theoretical]:**
- Reform impossibility thesis (*depends on accepting constraints as binding rather than elastic*)
- Fire scenario probability (*depends on political economy assumptions and resource constraint acceptance*)
- Bitcoin as structural exit (*depends on trust failure eventually occurring; contingent on fiscal dominance intensity*)

**[Speculative]:**
- Absolute resource constraints preventing debt service (*conflicts with USGS assessments; single grey literature source*)
- Bitcoin volatility declining to <25% collateral threshold (*extrapolation from 10-year trend*)
- Phase 1 base layer transition (*requires geopolitical trust failure not yet observed*)
- Terminal vs. cyclical determination (*insufficient data for structural classification*)

**Falsification criteria:**
1. Successful fiscal consolidation reducing debt/GDP without monetary expansion (New Zealand 1990s precedent) [Would challenge "fire" probability]
2. Bitcoin volatility sustained >50% annualized post-2028 halving [Would challenge Phase 2 timeline]
3. Stablecoin dominance remaining on Ethereum/Tron through 2026 [Would challenge Bitcoin rails thesis]
4. Resource substitution (sodium-ion batteries, circular economy) relaxing mineral constraints per USGS [Would challenge "terminal" classification]

---

## Conclusion: Phase Transition as Contingent Probability

This analysis argues for **phase transition as contingent probability driven by fiscal dominance pressures**, not deterministic replacement.

**The sequence:**
1. System faces severe reform friction (political-economic constraints) [Emerging]
2. Fire scenario is institutionally incentivized (fiscal dominance) [Emerging]
3. Bitcoin infrastructure builds during Phase 3 (fintech solving technical problems) [Emerging]
4. Volatility potentially compresses toward collateral threshold (Phase 2 approaching) [Speculative]
5. Trust failure may trigger Phase 1 (timing uncertain, direction contingent) [Speculative]

**Bitcoin is not inevitable because it is better money.** Bitcoin represents a structurally coherent hedge because:
- The alternative is a trap with politically difficult exits
- Infrastructure is building toward Bitcoin as one viable solution among constrained options
- Coalition forms through self-interest and path dependence
- Fire scenario makes fixed-supply, unseizable assets structurally attractive [Emerging]

The system is constrained between:
- Collapse it cannot easily accept (ice)
- Expansion it may not sustain (fire with resource uncertainty)
- Reform it cannot easily execute (political-economic friction)

**Bitcoin is what exists when the trap tightens.**

Not hope. Not prediction. **Structural hedge playing out over decades with contingent probability rather than deterministic necessity.**

The monetary architecture faces severe fiscal dominance pressures [Confirmed]. What comes next is not determined by belief—it is determined by institutional choices constrained by geometry. And the geometry suggests limited exits.

---

*Epistemic acknowledgment: This analysis synthesizes Tier 1 peer-reviewed data with Tier 2-3 institutional reports and Tier 4 theoretical frameworks. Claims of "inevitability" have been downgraded to "contingent probability" or "structural hedge" to reflect epistemic uncertainty. Competing explanations (resource substitution, institutional innovation, punctuated equilibrium reform) are acknowledged. Falsification criteria provided.*

HahHaha

2026-02-20T11:56:46Z

In reply to nevent1q…0h4d
_________________________

HahHaha

Agree. Everyone much more responsive here, much less ego. On X ...

2026-02-19T11:11:20Z

In reply to nevent1q…prts
_________________________

Agree. Everyone much more responsive here, much less ego. On X it’s just tribalism.

When productivity gains are captured via financialization rather ...

2026-02-19T05:10:50Z

In reply to nevent1q…wr9e
_________________________

When productivity gains are captured via financialization rather than wage growth, political competition shifts from 'growing the pie' to distributive conflict. The ideological turf war is thus not merely a symptom of failure, but a structural requirement of the current regime, fragmenting the precariat along cultural lines prevents the formation of a cross-ideological coalition targeting the shared economic adversary: the fiscal dominance regime requiring perpetual credit expansion.

Bitcoin is that coalition.

When productivity gains are captured via financialization rather ...

2026-02-19T03:59:12Z

When productivity gains are captured via financialization rather than wage growth, political competition shifts from 'growing the pie' to distributive conflict.

The ideological turf war is thus not merely a symptom of failure, but a structural requirement of the current regime, fragmenting the precariat along cultural lines prevents the formation of a cross-ideological coalition targeting the shared economic adversary: the fiscal dominance regime requiring perpetual credit expansion.

Bitcoin is that coalition.

Thank you for giving us your time to teach us LynAlden (nprofile…965n) Jeff Booth (nprofile…fqv5) jack mallers (nprofile…5egz) + many many more.

ETFs can be individuals though?

2026-02-17T22:40:01Z

In reply to nevent1q…6shx
_________________________

ETFs can be individuals though?

Not sure if you saw this re: Pam Bondi ...

2026-02-17T21:02:49Z

In reply to nevent1q…xlk2
_________________________

Not sure if you saw this re: Pam Bondi

Liquidation ≠ rotation. Forced, not strategic. Institutions ...

2026-02-17T05:18:24Z

In reply to nevent1q…f7k3
_________________________

Liquidation ≠ rotation. Forced, not strategic.

Institutions needed cash because funding stress increased (SOFR-EFFR spread blew out) and held Bitcoin as liquid asset.

Absolute steal at $40k

2026-02-16T23:51:44Z

In reply to nevent1q…hylj
_________________________

Absolute steal at $40k

Once you see it, that the bond market is the global vehicle by ...

2026-02-16T22:26:33Z

In reply to nevent1q…fdp0
_________________________

Once you see it, that the bond market is the global vehicle by which our governments sell our future time at a debasing rate….you can’t un-see it.

Bond market: how much slavery can we extract from this population ...

2026-02-16T22:18:28Z

Bond market: how much slavery can we extract from this population
Bitcoin: how much PoW do you need to be free

Yep - lots of people wanting to buy the dip

2026-02-16T02:07:26Z

In reply to nevent1q…rfxj
_________________________

Yep - lots of people wanting to buy the dip

Ohhhh, never thought about it like this. Thank you, I like this ...

2026-02-15T09:50:59Z

In reply to nevent1q…xq90
_________________________

Ohhhh, never thought about it like this. Thank you, I like this system analogy

Agree

2026-02-14T12:30:28Z

In reply to nevent1q…8fz8
_________________________

Agree

In sum: we can create our own reality ?

2026-02-14T12:23:08Z

In reply to nevent1q…cpu9
_________________________

In sum: we can create our own reality ?

Mad. Thanks brutha

2026-02-14T12:21:15Z

In reply to nevent1q…myne
_________________________

Mad. Thanks brutha

The paradox is that she probably believes she’s doing the right ...

2026-02-14T12:20:14Z

In reply to nevent1q…akkq
_________________________

The paradox is that she probably believes she’s doing the right thing.

Sup

2026-02-14T02:07:57Z

In reply to nevent1q…fj2h
_________________________

Sup

Aussie millennial bitcoiner ✌️

2026-02-14T02:07:35Z

In reply to nevent1q…mfq0
_________________________

Aussie millennial bitcoiner ✌️

When I started my bitcoin journey and heard Aussie voices in the ...

2026-02-13T11:55:13Z

In reply to nevent1q…pk6g
_________________________

When I started my bitcoin journey and heard Aussie voices in the interview for the first time I was like “fuck yeah these are my boys!!!”

Haha you don’t owe me anything, I’ll just ask questions. Love ...

2026-02-13T11:39:24Z

In reply to nevent1q…n65x
_________________________

Haha you don’t owe me anything, I’ll just ask questions. Love your work, it’s mad.
Good platform this one, nice to interact with bitcoiners I listen to and admire. Thanks for the responses and good energy. Aussie bitcoiner energy is definitely hectic 🇦🇺

So you’re thinking is that time and space structurally emerge ...

2026-02-13T11:22:22Z

In reply to nevent1q…x90v
_________________________

So you’re thinking is that time and space structurally emerge together? However, indoctrinated thought assumes time is a continuum assuming energy/matter is somewhat separate?

We’re deep in the weeds here. How do you view it? - A ...

2026-02-13T11:12:30Z

In reply to nevent1q…nqpy
_________________________

We’re deep in the weeds here. How do you view it?
- A simulation of discrete time? or like an experimental apparatus probing quantum spacetime structure?
(Both?)

- humans

2026-02-13T10:38:50Z

In reply to nevent1q…xj57
_________________________

- humans

They’re good at printing money

2026-02-13T10:37:54Z

In reply to nevent1q…636q
_________________________

They’re good at printing money

Stay humble, stack sats. These people will need us one day.

2026-02-12T12:20:16Z

In reply to nevent1q…v52p
_________________________

Stay humble, stack sats. These people will need us one day.

The solutions of bitcoin pervades all societal and technological ...

2026-02-12T12:18:28Z

In reply to nevent1q…mmxc
_________________________

The solutions of bitcoin pervades all societal and technological spheres. The dollar has an intrenched network effect that Bitcoin is just starting to move through, it’s going to take some time for society to understand the trap of fiat, even though it is obvious to us at this moment.
We are on a different time line.

Appreciate what you’re doing and building for humanity.

Stay humble, stack sats ✌️✌️✌️

2026-02-12T02:33:01Z

In reply to nevent1q…dtdp
_________________________

Stay humble, stack sats ✌️✌️✌️

The most interesting thing is that they revert to the same herd ...

2026-02-11T20:12:23Z

In reply to nevent1q…5rn7
_________________________

The most interesting thing is that they revert to the same herd narratives that have faded bitcoin since inception.
Like c’mon guys it takes an hour max to read the white paper, stop trying to value it like a stock.

She can do everything! 👨‍🎨📈

2026-02-11T19:29:15Z

In reply to nevent1q…z2ly
_________________________

She can do everything! 👨‍🎨📈

Hey Efrat - can you ask him how he manages to stay grounded and ...

2026-02-11T06:05:22Z

In reply to nevent1q…awkw
_________________________

Hey Efrat - can you ask him how he manages to stay grounded and maintains good mental health given everything he knows and researches.
His work has been so eye opening (and liberating in ways), but also given a decent dose of existential angst too. Is it something we need to get to the other side of, and relearn what it fundamentally means to focus on ourselves and our community?

Mad

2026-02-01T10:36:14Z

In reply to nevent1q…7sf2
_________________________

Mad

Welcome!!

2026-01-29T13:54:15Z

In reply to nevent1q…p8ts
_________________________

Welcome!!

Need this print lol

2026-01-03T06:26:25Z

In reply to nevent1q…ehkg
_________________________

Need this print lol

“It’s a trading vehicle” with no tangible ...

2025-12-27T11:49:42Z

In reply to nevent1q…ck8m
_________________________

“It’s a trading vehicle” with no tangible value…so…it’s money 🥴
Mr Armstrong, as this decade has shown us: the game is to trade shit money (fiat) for good money (gold, bitcoin) and chilling. (while these Tard-Fi’s blow themselves up “parking” “money” into over-levered tyre fires).

Australian hero

2025-12-14T11:21:36Z

In reply to nevent1q…g94g
_________________________

Australian hero

Truth

2025-12-05T22:25:20Z

In reply to nevent1q…lcd8
_________________________

Truth

Preach

2025-12-04T04:42:10Z

In reply to nevent1q…le4m
_________________________

Preach

lol

2025-12-03T12:12:22Z

In reply to nevent1q…ede4
_________________________

lol

Ok

2025-12-01T15:38:43Z

In reply to nevent1q…m33w
_________________________

Ok

the networking of Nakamoto Consensus; the solution to the ...

2025-12-01T14:36:33Z

In reply to nevent1q…cwaq
_________________________

the networking of Nakamoto Consensus; the solution to the Byzantine Generals Problem (the key breakthrough of bitcoin) cannot be caught. It is the only network in history that (still) does this. extremely powerful computers are designed specifically to do this task and this task only. That compute load (that pegs the money and the network to energy) won’t be redirected elsewhere because it can’t be.

Network effect makes it impossible to catch now. The ...

2025-12-01T12:39:48Z

In reply to nevent1q…um3z
_________________________

Network effect makes it impossible to catch now.
The breakthroughs were solving byzantines generals problem and difficulty adjustment. This breakthrough can only be copied, not “bettered”

Booth, Alden, Marty

2025-11-16T09:55:26Z

In reply to nevent1q…sdg3
_________________________

Booth, Alden, Marty

😂🤌🏻

2025-11-13T12:00:09Z

In reply to nevent1q…cwee
_________________________

😂🤌🏻

🫩

2025-10-21T10:47:22Z

In reply to nevent1q…re7x
_________________________

🫩

LinkedIn tho

2025-08-05T20:31:18Z

In reply to nevent1q…cu65
_________________________

LinkedIn tho