<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <updated></updated>
  <generator>https://nostr.ae</generator>

  <title>Nostr notes by </title>
  <author>
    <name></name>
  </author>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://nostr.ae/npub1pfl9uf5sy8wk65779tplzlap8zpngyh7dhl6pyp3redu4rztwjhsgnpp4f.rss" />
  <link href="https://nostr.ae/npub1pfl9uf5sy8wk65779tplzlap8zpngyh7dhl6pyp3redu4rztwjhsgnpp4f" />
  <id>https://nostr.ae/npub1pfl9uf5sy8wk65779tplzlap8zpngyh7dhl6pyp3redu4rztwjhsgnpp4f</id>
  <icon></icon>
  <logo></logo>




  <entry>
    <id>https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsdt0czkurm3ecaggx0ugmacnsur6y8dddagj9ps845e7tskxdm89czyq98uh3xjqsa6m2nmc4v8utl5yugxdqjlekllgysxy09hj5vfd627mdquzq</id>
    
      <title type="html">📅 Original date posted:2015-05-07 📝 Original message:Can ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsdt0czkurm3ecaggx0ugmacnsur6y8dddagj9ps845e7tskxdm89czyq98uh3xjqsa6m2nmc4v8utl5yugxdqjlekllgysxy09hj5vfd627mdquzq" />
    <content type="html">
      In reply to &lt;a href=&#39;/nevent1qqswj5p9c24a38xzwgj4l9zdue3kaqgj2a45yntkncyzdhxmgsslvgs4k8dh9&#39;&gt;nevent1q…8dh9&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;_________________________&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;📅 Original date posted:2015-05-07&lt;br/&gt;📝 Original message:Can anyone opposed to this proposal articulate in plain english the worst&lt;br/&gt;case scenario(s) if it goes ahead?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Some people in the conversation appear to be uncomfortable, perturbed,&lt;br/&gt;defensive etc about the proposal Š. But I am not seeing specifics on why it&lt;br/&gt;is not a feasible plan.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;From:  Mike Hearn &amp;lt;mike at plan99.net&amp;gt;&lt;br/&gt;Date:  Friday, 8 May, 2015 2:06 am&lt;br/&gt;To:  Btc Drak &amp;lt;btcdrak at gmail.com&amp;gt;&lt;br/&gt;Cc:  Bitcoin Dev &amp;lt;bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net&amp;gt;&lt;br/&gt;Subject:  Re: [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; I think you are rubbing against your own presupposition that people must find&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; and alternative right now. Quite a lot here do not believe there is any&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; urgency, nor that there is an immanent problem that has to be solved before&lt;br/&gt;&amp;gt; the sky falls in.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have explained why I believe there is some urgency, whereby &amp;#34;some urgency&amp;#34;&lt;br/&gt;I mean, assuming it takes months to implement, merge, test, release and for&lt;br/&gt;people to upgrade.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But if it makes you happy, imagine that this discussion happens all over&lt;br/&gt;again next year and I ask the same question.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;----------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br/&gt;-- One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud&lt;br/&gt;Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50&#43; applications Performance&lt;br/&gt;metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive&lt;br/&gt;visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y_____________________&#34;&gt;http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y_____________________&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;__________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list&lt;br/&gt;Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development&#34;&gt;https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;-------------- next part --------------&lt;br/&gt;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&lt;br/&gt;URL: &amp;lt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150508/ecf87458/attachment.html&amp;gt&#34;&gt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150508/ecf87458/attachment.html&amp;gt&lt;/a&gt;;
    </content>
    <updated>2023-06-07T15:33:16Z</updated>
  </entry>

</feed>