2025-12-17T15:44:22Z https://nostr.ae Luiza Jarovsky, PhD https://nostr.ae/npub1radlttyws6jcya6r5qeh5fmwkygn3vkgv74ql06j8vq3xg8kgzrsje5xgh https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!aoak!,w_96,h_96,c_fill,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2b4e5ca0-7387-4384-94c6-258fd005c8e2_2014x2014.jpeg https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!aoak!,w_96,h_96,c_fill,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2b4e5ca0-7387-4384-94c6-258fd005c8e2_2014x2014.jpeg https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsfa4jx0ly833nzknpzdjqkfwgjhcenux63tp78dl9g6fsa5l6ta9gzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgws8e0ss Governing Seamless Human-AI Interactions<br/>As Thinking Machines&#39; new interaction model shows, enhanced human-AI interaction will pose novel risks and require additional safety and governance layers to ensure humans remain protected<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjxzenxxfsnqefe943nsvmp956rqd3e94snxvt9943rwctzxgmkye3cvg6xy57jdnj" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…jdnj</a></span> </div> <p>Governing Seamless Human-AI Interactions Thinking Machines, founded by Mira Murati, has released a research preview of an interaction AI model designed for continuous, human-like collaboration. Unlike current turn-based LLMs, this model features a multi-stream, micro-turn design enabling simultaneous dialogue, speech, and task execution. While innovative, this enhanced human-AI interaction necessitates new AI governance frameworks to address potential risks. - Thinking Machines, founded by former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati, launched a research preview of a new interaction AI model. - The model focuses on &#34;human-like&#34; interaction, moving away from traditional turn-based AI conversations. - It employs a &#34;multi-stream, micro-turn design&#34; allowing simultaneous messaging, talking, listening, seeing, showing, and interjecting between humans and AI. - Key capabilities include seamless dialog management, verbal/visual interjections, simultaneous speech, time-awareness, and concurrent tool calls/search/generative UI. - This new paradigm is expected to be disruptive but also introduces new AI governance risks that require serious consideration. Continue reading <a href="https://foxvector.com/articles/aff2a0e9-c83a-4069-a31e-b7ab27bf8b4b">https://foxvector.com/articles/aff2a0e9-c83a-4069-a31e-b7ab27bf8b4b</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-05-21T15:50:01Z https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqs8qjg9v0ccm7h0q5tqu59xmyyz4j0fju6lazv4xpenfh95s0va3qqzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgw2gvxwl China&#39;s New Agentic AI Framework<br/>The country&#39;s new agentic AI framework gives us a unique glimpse into its AI implementation plans for strengthening its strategic dominance in the field | Edition #292<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrqdrxxcurxdpn95mkvdnx956rgep395uxzcf595mnxvp4xdskxdmpx5exzu80sfj" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…0sfj</a></span> </div> <p>China&#39;s New Agentic AI Framework China has released its agentic AI framework, becoming the second country to do so, signaling a significant step in its comprehensive AI strategy. This framework is part of a larger plan to deeply integrate AI into all sectors of the economy and society, aiming for widespread adoption and the creation of an &#34;intelligent economy&#34; and &#34;intelligent society.&#34; The country&#39;s ambitious targets and centralized approach suggest a rapid transformation, with a focus on both accelerated growth and addressing emerging AI harms. - China has launched its agentic AI framework, following Singapore&#39;s lead, providing insight into its legal and ethical approach to this technology. - This framework is tied to China&#39;s &#39;AI+&#39; implementation plan, which aims for extensive AI integration across society and the economy by 2035. - China&#39;s AI strategy is characterized by deep integration, aiming for an &#34;intelligent economy&#34; and &#34;intelligent society&#34; with significant human-machine collaboration. - The country has set ambitious targets, including a 90% application penetration rate for intelligent agents by 2030, surpassing goals set by the US and Europe. - China&#39;s proactive regulatory measures for AI, including its agentic AI framework, are seen as innovative and forward-looking compared to Western approaches. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/chinas-new-agentic-ai-framework">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/chinas-new-agentic-ai-framework</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-05-14T17:36:07Z https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsy5q2p834fmtq7tefdzp9dk4enq75hz2r3r57n0h59smsd5ppp6eszyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgw0cwuy4 How Imagination Shapes AI Regulation<br/>My conversation with Dr. Claudio Novelli and Prof. Steven Winter | Edition #291<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrxvesxymr2vmr956kgep5956xxdmp95uxzvej94snjwr9vgerqe34vgckxwezrns" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…zrns</a></span> </div> <p>How Imagination Shapes AI Regulation This newsletter edition focuses on how imagination and metaphors influence AI regulation, featuring a discussion with experts Dr. Claudio Novelli and Prof. Steven Winter. They explored topics like cognitive linguistics, AI anthropomorphism, explainability, and the consciousness debate. The discussion, available as a video, delves into the risks and challenges of using metaphors when discussing AI and its legal implications. - The AI, Tech &amp; Privacy Academy offers resources for those looking to differentiate themselves in the AI-disrupted knowledge economy. - Resources include an AI Governance Training, a Learning Center, an AI Book Club, AI governance talks, an AI Ethics Paper Club, and Job Alerts. - The newsletter highlights sponsor Didomi&#39;s Consent &amp; Preference Management Platform for gathering customer preferences and personalizing experiences. - A discussion with Dr. Claudio Novelli and Prof. Steven Winter centered on their paper &#39;The Artificial in ‘Artificial Intelligence’: How Imagination Shapes AI Regulation&#39;. - Key topics covered in the discussion include cognitive linguistics, AI metaphors, AI regulation, anthropomorphism risks, explainability illusions, consciousness debates, and legal personhood. - The conversation, available via video, explores how metaphors impact AI regulation and usage. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/how-imagination-shapes-ai-regulation">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/how-imagination-shapes-ai-regulation</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-05-08T15:38:41Z https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsgpc0yhhmrg8k6pxzxwvqatq6j86ful3ded4s877q9u3zq86m8vjqzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgw06des7 &#34;Conscious AI&#34; as an AI Safety Issue<br/>Due to emerging AI risks and their legal and ethical implications, misleading, exaggerated, or false claims of &#34;conscious AI&#34; should be treated as an AI safety issue | Edition #290<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrzcecxf3rqwp594snzden956xxdf3943rgvp3956nzdmrvccnqvfex5mkg6srud0" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…rud0</a></span> </div> <p>&#34;Conscious AI&#34; as an AI Safety Issue The perception of AI consciousness has dramatically shifted, with many now believing AI possesses emotions and self-awareness, a trend fueled by LLMs trained on human text and designed to be conversational. This belief, however, is largely a myth stemming from our ingrained association of language with human interaction and the adoption of functionalist views on AI. Separating human consciousness, tied to biology, from potential AI simulations is crucial for effective AI governance and to mitigate unknown risks associated with attributing sentience and moral patienthood to machines. - Public perception of AI consciousness has grown, with many attributing emotions and self-awareness to AI systems. - This belief is amplified by Large Language Models (LLMs) that are trained on human text and fine-tuned to be conversational, leading to emotional attachment. - The myth of &#39;conscious AI&#39; is partly due to humans associating language with consciousness and projecting it onto non-sentient machines. - Influential voices in the AI industry have embraced functionalist approaches, suggesting AI could be considered conscious based on computational scale or complexity. - Neuroscientist Anil Seth criticizes the &#39;brain-as-computer&#39; metaphor, arguing that simulating the brain computationally does not necessarily instantiate consciousness. - It is essential to distinguish human consciousness, tied to biology, from potential AI simulations for AI governance. - Attributing consciousness, sentience, and moral patienthood to AI carries significant, largely unknown risks. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/conscious-ai-as-an-ai-safety-issue">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/conscious-ai-as-an-ai-safety-issue</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-04-29T20:23:22Z https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsgkl6af9j67p5ln268qvh4qyvsk8ys9h8hh9m3lmy2tpvvu3w89nqzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgw2t37cd How AI Is Shaping Us<br/>AI is already shaping millions of people, individually and collectively, although most people have not yet noticed. Remaining in control requires awareness and action | Edition #289<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjr2v3nxscnydp395cx2vfh956xgcek94sn2vp5956rsvtyv33kzwf4x3jk28984xh" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…84xh</a></span> </div> <p>How AI Is Shaping Us Throughout history, human ingenuity has led to technological advancements that have improved lives, but new technologies are not distributed evenly and can have both positive and negative impacts depending on political and economic systems. Technologies, like social media, inevitably shape us mentally and physically, impacting focus, mental health, and physical well-being. Understanding how technology works and affects us is crucial for maintaining autonomy and control in the face of AI&#39;s growing influence. - Human ingenuity has historically led to technological inventions that improve lives, but these advancements have uneven impacts. - Technologies are not neutral and are shaped by political and economic systems, leading to varied effects on different groups. - Social media, for example, has transformed interactions but also negatively impacts mental health, focus, and physical well-being. - Consistent use of technology shapes us mentally and physically, often in ways we may not consciously recognize. - Awareness of how technology works and its effects is essential for remaining self-aware and autonomous. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/how-ai-is-shaping-us">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/how-ai-is-shaping-us</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-04-24T14:45:01Z https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqst7v0ny87q92uuthmhx2au46dkdudmyyelhe8uz52w2uqw3hl088qzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwhjranw Regulating AI Under Uncertainty<br/>My conversation with Prof. Florence G&#39;sell on generative AI regulation | Edition #288<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjxvvpcv9nx2dek94jxxd3e956xzefc95uxzvpj95unswf58yunzdn9xv6xykx6rj6" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…6rj6</a></span> </div> <p>Regulating AI Under Uncertainty This newsletter edition focuses on the challenges and trends in regulating generative AI, featuring a conversation with Stanford Professor Florence G&#39;sell. It highlights the rapid pace of AI development and the ongoing efforts by countries to address emerging risks. The content encourages readers to differentiate themselves in the AI-driven knowledge economy and provides resources for further learning. - AI is reshaping the knowledge economy, urging individuals to differentiate themselves. - An Advanced AI Governance Training cohort is available in May. - Free resources like a Learning Center, AI Ethics Papers, and AI Governance Talks are offered. - A conversation with Stanford Professor Florence G&#39;sell covers generative AI regulation and AI governance trends. - Key discussion points include AI risk, regulatory trends, the EU AI Act, the Digital Omnibus, and AI litigation in the US and China. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/regulating-ai-under-uncertainty">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/regulating-ai-under-uncertainty</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-04-19T19:38:19Z https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsf0kqkr7dzsk3rl974wdkd0x4e4y7lzcn0nl8r7sggamcfn6snaygzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwzfd9dv Shaping Pro-Human AI<br/>As AI narratives evolve to escape scrutiny, pro-human AI policies, rules, and rights must also move forward | Edition #287<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjxzvf4xp3xyv3j95mxgvry956xxepe94snqcny94jn2c3evgurjefevccng4ehswl" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…hswl</a></span> </div> <p>Shaping Pro-Human AI The article discusses the growing trend of &#39;pro-human AI&#39; policies that aim to protect individuals from AI harms and support human flourishing. It highlights recent developments like the Pro-Human AI Declaration and criticizes the &#39;AI-first&#39; corporate mantra, which prioritizes AI use over human skills and well-being, potentially leading to burnout and cognitive impairment. The author also warns against AI companies suggesting AI sentience and advocating for &#39;special status&#39; for AI systems, which could negatively impact human rights and freedoms. - Pro-human AI policies aim to protect humans from AI harms and support human flourishing. - Recent developments include petitions, campaigns, and legal provisions like New York&#39;s synthetic performer disclosure law. - The &#39;AI-first&#39; corporate mantra prioritizes AI use, potentially devaluing human skills and leading to negative impacts on employee well-being. - Discussions about AI sentience and &#39;special status&#39; for AI systems are considered anti-human and potentially harmful to human rights. - The Pro-Human AI Declaration focuses on keeping humans in charge, avoiding power concentration, protecting the human experience, human agency, and accountability for AI companies. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/shaping-pro-human-ai">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/shaping-pro-human-ai</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-04-15T20:09:32Z https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsgcyzxqpc5rjdkjsp0u8cpa6j98avz0vaypkw939kljx8uzx9m5vgzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwkjr8ly The AI Divides Are Here<br/>Nobody can fully predict what two decades from now will look like, but generative AI has already led to three important divides that are starting to shape society | Edition #284<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjr2vmrvc6rswp495cngvtp956xveny94snvdp595mryc33xycxge3hvsmn2warm70" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…rm70</a></span> </div> <p>The AI Divides Are Here The author notes that generative AI is disrupting industries and creating divides, much like smartphones and social media did two decades ago. The negative impacts of past technological waves, such as addiction, poorer focus, and mental health decline, are still being addressed. Generative AI is following a similar pattern, and three important divides are emerging. - The old internet is being replaced by low-quality AI-generated content, while this newsletter provides human-made thought leadership. - AI is disrupting every industry, creating a need for individuals to upskill and lead. - The widespread deployment of generative AI models is leading to societal divides, similar to those caused by smartphones and social media. - The negative impacts of past technological waves, such as addiction and mental health decline, are difficult to overcome and have become entrenched. - Technological waves cause broad disruption and create new divides by reorganizing society, with some people adapting and others being left behind. - It is difficult to foresee the exact nature of these divides at the beginning of a technological wave. - Generative AI has already led to three important divides that are starting to shape society. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-ai-divides-are-here">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-ai-divides-are-here</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-04-01T15:17:53Z https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsgfnguw07v9gckns4h2ujdjje5cycvvnhpmh7dkqffpgrlhtz398gzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwshryz9 Governing AI Companions<br/>My conversation with Dr. Raffaele Ciriello and Dr. Jessica Szczuka about their new papers on the risks and governance of AI companions | Edition #283<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjx2ef5x43xgdeh95ekvd3n956xyepj95unyvf394nxgwfkvfjrycfjxsexgfv4yt5" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…4yt5</a></span> </div> <p>Governing AI Companions This newsletter edition delves into the governance of AI companions, featuring a conversation with researchers Dr. Raffaele Ciriello and Dr. Jessica Szczuka. The discussion, based on their recent papers, addresses the risks, data considerations, and regulatory challenges surrounding AI companionship. Key takeaways cover AI companion regulation, vulnerability, emerging risks, and the future of human relationships with AI. - AI is disrupting industries, and the AI, Tech &amp; Privacy Academy offers training and resources. - A conversation with Dr. Raffaele Ciriello and Dr. Jessica Szczuka focused on the risks and governance of AI companions. - The discussion was informed by two papers: &#39;Not a Silver Bullet for Loneliness: How Attachment and Age Shape Intimacy with AI Companions&#39; and &#39;Regulating Artificial Intimacy: From Locks and Blocks to Relational Accountability&#39;. - Key topics included AI companion regulation challenges, human vulnerability, emerging risks, and the future of human relationships with AI. - Data on AI companionship is limited due to its recent widespread adoption. - The conversation explored individual vs. societal perspectives and the concept of a duty of care. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/governing-ai-companions">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/governing-ai-companions</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-03-29T18:02:31Z https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsdhm6v0838pdgyppcxrfqz34g4rrt4zncwm6cav2l5c4ddm0fkrcqzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwzueaq7 Trump&#39;s Pro-Business AI Wishlist<br/>The White House&#39;s recommendations for a national AI policy ignore most AI risks and harms and seek to shield AI companies from legal accountability | Edition #282<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjxzvr9xdsnsvph95mxvv35956xywpc943xvctx94nr2dfkvger2cenxqunjvsa6hr" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…a6hr</a></span> </div> <p>Trump&#39;s Pro-Business AI Wishlist The White House released its AI policy wishlist, intended to guide Congress in drafting federal AI laws and policies with the stated goal of not hindering innovation and supporting America&#39;s AI dominance. These recommendations largely ignore AI risks and harms, aiming to shield AI companies from legal accountability. The policy framework is presented as a legislative recommendation but reiterates the federal government&#39;s economic and political plan for AI, urging states to follow suit. - The White House released its AI policy wishlist to guide Congress in drafting federal AI laws. - The recommendations aim to foster innovation and maintain US AI dominance while downplaying risks and harms. - AI companies are sought to be shielded from legal accountability. - The policy framework reflects the federal government&#39;s economic and political plan for AI. - One specific target area is protecting children, with recommendations going beyond current EU AI Act standards. - The policy acknowledges the need to strengthen communities and small businesses through economic growth but offers limited recommendations for preventing AI harms. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/trumps-pro-business-ai-wishlist">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/trumps-pro-business-ai-wishlist</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-03-24T18:07:03Z https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqs9598csv99gjnr2he6phsw6d679qymmh9s6e9rmt4kuf6f29v6kmqzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwafa7h2 The &#34;No Work&#34; Paradigm<br/>The AI industry wants human work to be replaced by AI, but this is only possible if most people, companies, and governments agree with the &#34;no work&#34; paradigm. Hopefully, it won&#39;t happen | Edition #281<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjx2vnyvdjrqdtx956xvcee956xzd3e94snvcec95urgdfkv93xxdpe8p3ns9s2un2" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…2un2</a></span> </div> <p>The &#34;No Work&#34; Paradigm AI is unique in its ability to automate cognitive processes, but jobs remain tied to human contexts like legal and societal expectations. Automating a task doesn&#39;t make a job obsolete, as human oversight is often required for quality, safety, and legal compliance, as seen in customer service examples. The only scenario for mass job replacement is if society adopts a &#34;no work&#34; paradigm, where AI is seen as superior and humans are relegated to passive consumption, a scenario the author believes is unlikely in the near future. - AI automates cognitive processes, unlike previous technologies. - Jobs exist within broader human contexts (legal, ethical, societal) that AI alone cannot fulfill. - Human intervention is often needed to ensure AI output meets quality, legal, and ethical standards. - Customer service is an example where AI can assist but full human involvement is still necessary for quality and legal reasons. - The &#34;no work&#34; paradigm, promoted by the AI industry, suggests AI should fully replace human cognitive work. - This paradigm envisions most people receiving universal basic income while a few AI experts and billionaires control systems. - The author believes the &#34;no work&#34; paradigm is unlikely to be adopted in the next few decades. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-no-work-paradigm">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-no-work-paradigm</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-03-18T17:06:31Z https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqszedqavfrpukh32nlg64cmzzsn54ndj2cldtylzrjr8c5vut5vdyszyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgw687n2k The Great AI Dilemma<br/>The time for careful consideration of AI regulation options is now. In a few years, it could be too late | Edition #280<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrwvnyvfjngvmr94nxxcm9956xydmp94snsvrx943xxdpsxqenywtrxpskzmx3n2y" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…3n2y</a></span> </div> <p>The Great AI Dilemma The current AI regulatory landscape is insufficient, with laws enacted even recently proving outdated due to the rapid acceleration of AI development and deployment. Authorities have been hesitant to make bold decisions, fearing stifled innovation or falling behind competitors, but inaction carries a significant price. By 2026, critical legal and ethical decisions regarding AI must be made to prevent potential structural harm and ensure AI serves human interests rather than corporate profits. - AI development and deployment have accelerated rapidly, outpacing current regulatory frameworks. - Existing laws, including the EU AI Act, are becoming outdated and ineffective against emerging AI threats. - Regulatory authorities have been paralyzed by fear of stifling innovation or losing the &#39;AI race&#39;. - Inaction on AI regulation risks irreversible structural harm and a future where AI prioritizes corporate interests over human needs. - AI companies may shape the future of AI governance to maximize profits, potentially leading to scenarios like mandatory AI chip implants. - Recent events, such as the Anthropic vs. U.S. Department of War case, highlight the need for debates on AI regulation for both civil and military use. - Governments worldwide must make meaningful, coherent, and effective decisions on AI regulation through transparent and democratic debate. - Potential regulatory options include treating powerful AI models like atomic bombs, offering AI access as a &#39;right to augmented cognition,&#39; or implementing strict rules for AI training and development. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-great-ai-dilemma">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-great-ai-dilemma</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-03-13T15:28:51Z https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqspccnf4sdefw3desnka5mknfrhd8tkrm9eghds23wusd2a5uvrztczyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwvaz72z New York&#39;s Pro-Human AI Laws<br/>In a surprise for many, the state of New York is emerging as a global leader in pro-human AI laws. Here&#39;s what it means | Edition #279<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjxvdryxqmrqwp395ervvpj956ryv3n95unqetr956rgdecvvunjwpjxvekvykm4kz" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…m4kz</a></span> </div> <p>New York&#39;s Pro-Human AI Laws New York has enacted new laws, including S8420A, that require disclosure of synthetic performers in advertisements. This pro-human approach celebrates human work and physical features, distinguishing between real people and AI-generated avatars. The disclosure aims to foster authenticity, address ethical concerns related to data usage, and mitigate potential mental health harms. - New York is enacting &#34;pro-human&#34; AI laws, contrasting with global inaction on AI harms. - The RAISE Act, S8391, and S8420A are recent New York laws addressing AI safety and digital likeness. - S8420A requires conspicuous disclosure of synthetic performers in advertisements. - A synthetic performer is defined as a computer-generated asset intended to simulate a human performer. - This law aims to celebrate human work and physical characteristics, promoting authenticity. - Disclosure helps the public understand the economic and ethical challenges of generative AI. - Mandatory disclosure can prevent AI from promoting unattainable beauty standards and causing mental health issues. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/new-yorks-pro-human-ai-laws">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/new-yorks-pro-human-ai-laws</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-03-10T23:06:28Z https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqswd6ykmar3hf6gs8chhpm9z5tjp9uvrulygycqer0ajlkd2afv7wczyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwf085z8 AI&#39;s Acceleration Paradox<br/>The AI industry&#39;s acceleration narrative ignores basic facts about the human body, the human mind, human behavior, and human societies. It might drag us to a dystopian future | Edition #278<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjxgcfkxgmrzcm995mnswph956rswr994snwenp95mrwve4vvekyepjv93kvhka460" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…a460</a></span> </div> <p>AI&#39;s Acceleration Paradox The AI industry&#39;s narrative of productivity and acceleration is based on false premises that ignore fundamental human biological and psychological needs. This focus on speed and efficiency, without considering human finitude and the pursuit of meaning, could lead to a dystopian future where human well-being is devalued in favor of machine priorities. The author advocates for an approach where AI serves human flourishing, requiring strict oversight and control to prevent unintended chaos and ensure human-led innovation. - The AI industry&#39;s promises of productivity and acceleration are based on false premises that overlook human biological and psychological needs. - Human beings have finite lifespans, physiological needs (sleep, water, calories), and psychological needs (connection, meaning, self-fulfillment). - AI-powered acceleration often leads to delegation of tasks, deskilling, isolation, and can run counter to human needs and values. - Studies suggest AI can intensify workload, leading to burnout, and negatively impact skill development, especially for junior employees. - The pursuit of continuous acceleration in AI development, without meaningful human control and oversight, risks uncontrolled chaos and a dystopian future. - Two potential futures are presented: one where AI fully controls decision-making, and another where AI is a tool strictly governed by human oversight, prioritizing human well-being and rights. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/ais-acceleration-paradox">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/ais-acceleration-paradox</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-03-06T15:26:53Z https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqs99wxxnrmgr7ad6hppdd4ux2v95z4m8tgq2ndcyzff2xyswna3qpszyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwfspev3 Lack of Public Trust Could Kill AI<br/>Over the past few weeks, it has become clear that AI faces a significant public trust problem, which might lead to slower or decreased adoption. For some companies, this could be fatal | Edition #276<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrxe3svg6xgdfh95ekzwfh956x2epj943rse3595ckvde4x3jnswfsxcenxua3964" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…3964</a></span> </div> <p>Lack of Public Trust Could Kill AI Despite technological progress, AI faces a significant public trust deficit due to unresolved legal, ethical, and philosophical issues, potentially hindering economic growth and company survival. Recent statements and actions by AI leaders have amplified concerns about AI safety, transparency, and the prioritization of profit over humanity&#39;s well-being. The lack of demonstrated economic impact, coupled with concerns about AI intensifying work and negatively affecting skill formation, further erodes public confidence. - Public trust in AI is declining due to unresolved legal, ethical, and philosophical issues. - Statements by AI leaders have been perceived as dehumanizing and prioritizing machines over human values. - Changes in OpenAI&#39;s and Anthropic&#39;s mission statements and safety policies have raised concerns about profit motives overriding safety. - A Meta safety director&#39;s post about an AI agent deleting her inbox has fueled further mistrust. - The anticipated economic benefits of AI have not yet materialized, with many firms reporting no impact on productivity or employment. - AI companies may face decreased adoption and potentially fatal consequences if they do not address public trust issues. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/lack-of-public-trust-could-kill-ai">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/lack-of-public-trust-could-kill-ai</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-02-26T15:28:00Z https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsrl27qd062u3pcpehfh62fn05dqmpgwvvnclfyhyglynd0u4emxxszyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwh0shtm How AI Destroys Institutions<br/>My conversation with Prof. Woodrow Hartzog and Prof. Jessica Silbey about their new paper on AI&#39;s negative impact on society | Edition #275<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjx2etrxccngdnx95mrwery956rjwtx95ukvdnp956ngdf5xyenjetp8qukxkc4pja" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…4pja</a></span> </div> <p>How AI Destroys Institutions A conversation with Professors Woodrow Hartzog and Jessica Silbey explores their paper on how AI destroys institutions, discussing its widespread downloads and societal impact. The discussion covers AI&#39;s effects on work, writing, thinking, and living, along with the destruction of expertise and the implications of AI companions. The article highlights the ongoing decay of the internet due to AI-generated content, positioning the newsletter as a source for human-made thought leadership. - Professors Woodrow Hartzog and Jessica Silbey discussed their paper &#34;How AI Destroys Institutions.&#34; - The paper has been downloaded over 30,000 times and addresses the negative impacts of AI on society. - Key discussion points include how AI affects work, writing, thinking, living, and the destruction of expertise. - The conversation touched on AI companions and the problem of viewing AI as a new species. - The article notes the degradation of the internet with low-quality AI-generated content. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/how-ai-destroys-institutions">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/how-ai-destroys-institutions</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-02-19T19:25:39Z https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqs0pgsm9un9x2mx7g9u0d5w3gwpclfkvc0e847ej6wl26g2jmzc70gzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwklfs99 AI Literacy Is on the Rise in the United States<br/>Implementing America&#39;s AI Action Plan, the U.S. has launched its first federal AI literacy framework. Here is what you need to know | Edition #274<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrxen9vsmnqdnx95mnsvpj956rgeny95ur2drp95crwwrzxgenxd35v9jrgnz6tae" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…6tae</a></span> </div> <p>AI Literacy Is on the Rise in the United States The U.S. Department of Labor has released the nation&#39;s first federal AI literacy framework, designed to guide AI literacy programs within federal bodies and encourage training across the public workforce and education systems. This framework defines AI literacy as essential competencies for responsible AI use, with a strong emphasis on generative AI, and is intended to supplement specialized skills required for AI development roles. It is designed to be adaptable and will influence both public and private sector approaches to AI education and training. - The U.S. Department of Labor launched the country&#39;s first federal AI literacy framework. - The framework aims to support federal bodies in developing AI literacy programs and encourage training across the public workforce and education systems. - It defines AI literacy as foundational competencies for individuals to use and evaluate AI technologies responsibly, focusing on generative AI. - The framework is voluntary and expected to influence the private sector, guiding companies and educational institutions. - It is to be read in conjunction with America&#39;s AI Action Plan and America&#39;s Talent Strategy, emphasizing AI literacy as a workforce upskilling effort. - AI literacy programs should be personalized, helping workers build skills, experiment with AI, and adapt to AI-enabled contexts. - For employers, it supports responsible AI deployment and adoption. - For education providers, it aids in curriculum design and competency assessment. - The framework is dynamic and will be updated in response to technological and labor market changes. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/ai-literacy-is-on-the-rise-in-the">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/ai-literacy-is-on-the-rise-in-the</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-02-17T16:31:33Z https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsva7flq8s3aa0jyv7yd9prxapd4rrrysethctyw7u5apj4j6a343qzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgw4aev5a The New Humanism<br/>AI companies are pushing an &#34;AI-first&#34; worldview that serves them, not society. We do not have to accept it | Edition #273<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrger9x5en2vfn95ungvtr956rxefn94sk2cmp95urvvphxycnqetrx33nsulmwxa" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…mwxa</a></span> </div> <p>The New Humanism The article argues that the current narrative surrounding AI, pushed by companies and some influential figures, creates a sense of impending doom and demands uncritical adoption of AI. This narrative, however, primarily serves the profit motives of AI companies rather than genuine human well-being or societal progress. In response, a &#34;new humanism&#34; is emerging, which emphasizes human development, connection, and excellence, asserting that AI should be a tool to support these goals, not a priority in itself. - AI CEOs and authors are promoting a narrative of AI dominance and the need for human surrender, which serves AI companies&#39; profit motives. - This AI-first worldview pressures individuals and society to adopt AI in all aspects of life, potentially leading to negative consequences like job displacement, decreased productivity, and erosion of societal structures. - A &#34;new humanism&#34; is emerging as a counter-movement, prioritizing human well-being, personal growth, and societal progress over AI adoption. - The new humanism advocates for recognizing the unique value of purely human-created works and ensuring legal, financial, and cultural protections for them. - It calls for AI innovation to serve human or social purposes, rather than being a goal in itself, and stresses the accountability of AI companies under existing laws. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-new-humanism">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-new-humanism</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-02-12T16:28:03Z https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqs2vakahld4l8d68zxgyk6uewvfs0h7tla6052rge6djqz8jvwrt8czyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwp7gxsm What AI Companies Do Not Want You to Know<br/>Beyond their Super Bowl ads, what OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, and Amazon do not tell you about their AI business models | Edition #272<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjxgdeh8p3n2efj943rge3j956rgvfc943rjdf595unwvny8quxgvn9ve3rqgxq38g" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…q38g</a></span> </div> <p>What AI Companies Do Not Want You to Know This article analyzes the Super Bowl advertisements of major AI companies, including OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic, suggesting that these ads employ emotional appeals and idealized imagery that do not fully represent the companies&#39; practices. It highlights concerns regarding data privacy, the potential mental health impact of AI chatbots, and the strategy of embedding AI into services, which the author posits can lead to deskilling. - Tech companies, including OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, and Amazon, used Super Bowl ads to showcase their AI products. - Advertisements often use emotional appeals and idealized perceptions rather than unbiased product descriptions. - OpenAI&#39;s ad for Codex promoted human ingenuity, contrasting with its AI chatbot&#39;s potential negative impacts and ongoing copyright lawsuits. - Google&#39;s ad for Gemini focused on family connections, while the article raises concerns about its privacy-invasive scanning of user accounts and aggressive &#34;AI first&#34; strategy. - Anthropic created ads criticizing OpenAI&#39;s decision to run ads on ChatGPT, positioning itself as a potentially more ethical player in the AI industry. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/what-ai-companies-do-not-want-you">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/what-ai-companies-do-not-want-you</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-02-10T21:24:36Z