https://nostr.ae https://nostr.ae/npub1sjul23khr55e77kqjwk78k329gvvz97ynuzx92zkppxc7xnyyt9s5uh28y https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsz4vrlt5f6ylvj6sjftz0zyfkq2lsvwnjlzufr6t5yfjkfuahrtcszyzztna2x6uwjn8m6czf6mc769g4p3sghcj0sgc4g2cyymrc6vs3vkjz3fh8 In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqsxfjsm60amypxpqjwqhjpx3raq5cwfanlj7cckzgar77elq4aszfc8x0wnq'>nevent1q…0wnq</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>📅 Original date posted:2023-08-11<br/>🗒️ Summary of this message: The author is asking for clarification on the expected return value of the function `is_segwit()` for a p2tr transaction and if there is an official name for segwit v0.<br/>📝 Original message:<br/>Question for OG bitcoin API designers please.<br/><br/>If you were to see the following function<br/><br/> `is_segwit()`<br/><br/>would you assume it returns `true` or `false` for a p2tr transaction?<br/><br/><br/>Currently we (rust-bitcoin) are being liberal with the use of `v0` but<br/>its a pretty ugly. Is there an official, or widely used, name for segwit v0?<br/><br/><br/>Thanks,<br/>Tobin. 2023-08-12T09:56:44Z https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqsfcrh5qgav9c6xnsysj9vr30lwhlm8je3xd4ph2s2gdryxn4m4vqczyzztna2x6uwjn8m6czf6mc769g4p3sghcj0sgc4g2cyymrc6vs3vkww2m6g In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqsdtldfwzjt4m4qn3axj6zgz472h55jzd9spu2myv3d6nf3ddgaymszad7gt'>nevent1q…d7gt</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>📅 Original date posted:2022-07-09<br/>📝 Original message:Hi Peter,<br/><br/>Interesting blog post. <br/><br/>On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 11:31:26AM -0400, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:<br/>&gt; On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 08:24:51AM -0700, Eric Voskuil wrote:<br/>&gt; &gt; To clarify, price inflation is not caused by market production. Attributing the observed lack of inflation (eg fee %) to loss is an assumed relation.<br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; My article is a mathematical proof that has nothing to do with observations of<br/>&gt; inflation.<br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; What I did is prove that if there is tail emission/fixed supply, the coin<br/>&gt; supply will converge towards a fixed amount because the coin supply dependant<br/>&gt; rate of coin loss balances out the fixed rate of coin production.<br/>&gt; <br/>&gt; That proof has nothing to do with market dynamics and would happen in any<br/>&gt; system, economic or not, with similar underlying dynamics.<br/><br/>I&#39;m not a mathematician but I think your models assumption that coin<br/>loss is proportional to number of coins misses something, correct me if<br/>I&#39;m wrong but as value of coins goes up is it not reasonable to expect<br/>coin loss to go down as people are more careful (not to mention<br/>improvements in tooling and education).<br/><br/>Is it really possible to model coin loss as exponential decay<br/>considering such things (I&#39;m not being facetious, that is a real<br/>question, like I said I&#39;m not a mathematician)?<br/><br/>Cheers,<br/>Tobin.<br/>-------------- next part --------------<br/>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br/>Name: signature.asc<br/>Type: application/pgp-signature<br/>Size: 833 bytes<br/>Desc: not available<br/>URL: &lt;<a href="http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220710/3ff76efc/attachment-0001.sig&gt">http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220710/3ff76efc/attachment-0001.sig&gt</a>; 2023-06-07T23:11:25Z