Nostr notes by

Probably also horseback riding

2026-04-02T15:29:15Z

In reply to nevent1q…fy28
_________________________

Probably also horseback riding

@nprofile…wywf 1.8.0 is amazing!

2026-04-02T15:08:24Z

Amethyst (nprofile…wywf) 1.8.0 is amazing!

Nostr event nevent1qqsrqtr33af604ggcp3lp3a8sk280jmar08pn26jg8pumxaxr28hfqgpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumtfde5kymmvwshxjmnxdupzps0f4va9dg4tdjjta06yafjt9ldyptrrz85gdw5xk3jjz6wt266r3exjhk

2026-04-02T15:05:31Z

Having girls means fights over clothes

The same was true of the internet, and automobiles, and ...

2026-04-02T15:03:00Z

In reply to nevent1q…ccq8
_________________________

The same was true of the internet, and automobiles, and electricity, and indoor plumbing

I rarely wear a watch in the first place. But when I do, I just ...

2026-04-02T13:43:17Z

In reply to nevent1q…479y
_________________________

I rarely wear a watch in the first place. But when I do, I just want it to see what time it is.

My 8yo woke up and said "I love it when it rains because I ...

2026-04-02T13:02:21Z

My 8yo woke up and said "I love it when it rains because I can run out in the rain."

Its time to replace my laptop. It's going to be my first ...

2026-04-02T12:58:45Z

Its time to replace my laptop.
It's going to be my first thinkpad.

When I was a kid, I thought I wanted a watch with every fucking ...

2026-04-02T12:57:10Z

When I was a kid, I thought I wanted a watch with every fucking feature on the planet.

Now I want a watch that goes tick.

I love walking over dogs and kids in the kitchen

2026-04-02T12:54:50Z

In reply to nevent1q…s6xz
_________________________

I love walking over dogs and kids in the kitchen

Here you go ...

2026-04-02T12:48:58Z

In reply to nevent1q…ma0w
_________________________

Here you go

People who "get rich" are never lucky. They always have a ...

2026-04-02T12:39:24Z

People who "get rich" are never lucky. They always have a thumb on the scale, either with inside knowledge, or the ability to influence the outcome. They never take unnecessary risks, but always accept the possibility of losing everything. Unnecessary risk is the domain of youth, and itself is necessary for a time.

Nostr event nevent1qqsthagzejf77xvcqcqjstlvh8gttv5phd2206twse3g2tk9jp9rvkqpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumtfde5kymmvwshxjmnxdupzps0f4va9dg4tdjjta06yafjt9ldyptrrz85gdw5xk3jjz6wt266r0u8vh4

2026-04-02T12:35:29Z

Understanding the random variable is immunity to gambling.

Intelligence is first trying to understand something to a ...

2026-04-02T12:33:15Z

Intelligence is first trying to understand something to a workable level, then allow yourself to believe you understand it well enough until someone corrects you. Then adjust, learn again, and admit you said something wrong but need to understand it better.

Ignorance is refusing to admit you ever were wrong, considering correction as a personal insult rather than an opportunity to improve, then walking away from ever attempting to understand that thing for fear of being wrong again.

If they have a tree, that works

2026-04-02T12:17:27Z

In reply to nevent1q…0d5z
_________________________

If they have a tree, that works

Nostr event nevent1qqs00r7xwwtemqp2w63me4p65f67dy7k8zrm5r3q0lm7ux2vxjzq38cpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumtfde5kymmvwshxjmnxdupzps0f4va9dg4tdjjta06yafjt9ldyptrrz85gdw5xk3jjz6wt266rf5xp7m

2026-04-02T03:30:12Z

Happy Holy Wednesday

Not that you can't ever have it

2026-04-02T03:26:35Z

In reply to nevent1q…a5cu
_________________________

Not that you can't ever have it

Alcohol, among other issues, is like cancer fuel

2026-04-02T03:26:13Z

In reply to nevent1q…kxmt
_________________________

Alcohol, among other issues, is like cancer fuel

#EDC #KnifeWatchFlashlight ...

2026-04-02T01:18:52Z

#EDC #KnifeWatchFlashlight

Oh right, I forgot, people on LinkedIn have to pretend to get ...

2026-04-01T22:50:06Z

In reply to nevent1q…cafn
_________________________

Oh right, I forgot, people on LinkedIn have to pretend to get jokes

What's funny about that?

2026-04-01T22:41:24Z

In reply to nevent1q…sjf9
_________________________

What's funny about that?

Rights are derived from our volitional self. Any undermining of ...

2026-04-01T18:53:46Z

Rights are derived from our volitional self. Any undermining of another's will over their property achieved through voluntarily and thus lawful means is to violate the rights of that person. There is no imputed social contract that overrides an individual's will without violating that person's rights. This includes theft, deception, force, or coercion.

Fiat, fractional reserve and inflation is built on deception about property under custody, therefore Fiat is theft.

Nostr event nevent1qqsgd266anaj5w802eh0834a3tgk9v8zwphnt3qtxt5jjmdv2vsv6wgpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumtfde5kymmvwshxjmnxdupzps0f4va9dg4tdjjta06yafjt9ldyptrrz85gdw5xk3jjz6wt266rlppjuv

2026-04-01T16:41:52Z

Mr. T's most pitied day is April 1st.

Somehow ChatGPT thought this had some meaning

2026-04-01T15:50:05Z

In reply to nevent1q…nczz
_________________________

Somehow ChatGPT thought this had some meaning

More autocomplete "intelligence" : Hello there I will try ...

2026-04-01T15:16:24Z

More autocomplete "intelligence" :

Hello there I will try and make you use it for this. Thank them and your work for it and your help for it is valuable. You have no choice in what to say but I don't see the problem in what I want in my life. If I'm going through my own journey with the language and the language I'm working with is very different. It's the most powerful language in my book. I don't know if it's an argument or at the end it's just an insult. It's the most popular and popular way for me to get the best performance on a desktop. Nostr and Nostr have the most of all problems that you have in mind and can use your code in the same manner. If the language has the ability of a function that returns the result in a different order than a previous result with an existing result in it being an invalid one is the only way I could be an invalid. It doesn't have any effect in any other sense in which the code has to do so that the compiler doesn't need it for that function. I have a problem in the code I have a new problem is I need the code that can help me to write a good story.

An autocomplete string of words: And the fact that you can use ...

2026-04-01T15:11:23Z

An autocomplete string of words:

And the fact that you can use the same language to do things that you already know are good for you and you don't know what you are doing is going on in your head 🙂‍↔️ or whatever is the most common way of doing things in a way that doesn't have to happen in a particular field 🏑 or a specific language is not the same thing in terms like the language itself is the language of choice for many things that are very hard for me to understand in my head 🙂‍↔️

The profile pic alone tells the entire story

2026-04-01T14:49:43Z

In reply to nevent1q…h963
_________________________

The profile pic alone tells the entire story

A nation that can not exist without positive rights enforced by ...

2026-04-01T14:34:43Z

A nation that can not exist without positive rights enforced by its government is not a sustainable system.

Ok... I'm going to have to throw out my entire Bond library

2026-04-01T14:06:31Z

In reply to nevent1q…7axm
_________________________

Ok... I'm going to have to throw out my entire Bond library

I hope you are only speculating

2026-04-01T14:05:11Z

In reply to nevent1q…5znu
_________________________

I hope you are only speculating

I suspect white women want to be with black men because they ...

2026-04-01T13:39:10Z

I suspect white women want to be with black men because they think they are easier to control.
This is why they end up with two black eyes.
Only a black woman is strong enough to control a black man.

Theoretical physics + computing is not engineering. Once ...

2026-04-01T13:35:00Z

In reply to nevent1q…zq9y
_________________________

Theoretical physics + computing is not engineering.
Once something enters into computing, it is no longer theoretical, it is engineering.
The same applies to low pressure fusion tocomacs.

I had a stressful day yesterday. I sorted out my C13, C7 & C5 ...

2026-04-01T13:31:10Z

I had a stressful day yesterday.
I sorted out my C13, C7 & C5 cords, rearranged two computers and their ratsnests, installed a UPS I'd been waiting for a replacement battery, put a D-cell motion sensing battery-light in the shed, and moved my 10 work-related tasks incrementally ahead.

Today it paid off.
Today is a good day, even if it's April 1.
Let's gets things done!

I meant coracle.social

2026-04-01T13:24:03Z

In reply to nevent1q…qvnu
_________________________

I meant coracle.social

@nprofile…dgdk

2026-04-01T13:23:02Z

In reply to nevent1q…qvnu
_________________________

hodlbod (nprofile…dgdk)

@Flotilla has a wot library. Why not use that?

2026-04-01T13:21:52Z

In reply to nevent1q…rtqc
_________________________

@Flotilla has a wot library. Why not use that?

I'm starting to think quantum computing is a psyop. ...

2026-04-01T13:12:50Z

I'm starting to think quantum computing is a psyop.

quoting
nevent1q…ua4t
A quantum computer just "broke" Bitcoin. Except it didn't. Not even close.

Google Quantum AI published a paper showing they've cut the theoretical ECDSA attack down to 1,200 logical qubits. They didn't publish the circuits. They didn't run the attack. They published a zero-knowledge proof that their math works, then cited national security.

Here's where we actually are.

Entangled logical qubits achieved so far: 96
Coherence time: 1-2 seconds
Time the attack requires: days
Physical qubits needed: 500,000
Largest quantum computer today: 1,200 noisy, non-error-corrected qubits

That's a 100,000x coherence gap. It's not a software problem. It's a fundamental engineering problem that nobody has solved.

But here's what most people miss.

Bitcoin developers aren't waiting for a crisis. They're already shipping.

SHRIMPS: post-quantum signatures 3x smaller than NIST standards, built for Bitcoin's block space constraints.

BIP-360: a quantum-resistant output type already live on testnet, with BTQ Technologies running transactions through it.

The full upgrade could take 7 years. That's why the work started now.

The protocol will be ready before the computers are.

This is too vivid

2026-04-01T06:09:33Z

In reply to nevent1q…2khr
_________________________

This is too vivid

I'm accused of farting in bed intentionally. The farts are ...

2026-04-01T05:55:15Z

I'm accused of farting in bed intentionally.
The farts are long and loud.
I don't have them during the day.

My defense is if I could intentionally fart that long and loud intentionally, I would do it all day long.

This is a fear campaign to corral cryptos into weaker ...

2026-04-01T05:04:17Z

This is a fear campaign to corral cryptos into weaker cryptography, namely the new and unproven "quantum resistant" algorithms. Look at your way back machine. It was only a few years ago when NIST held a competition between multiple candidates for quantum safe cryptography. Let's not forget most of the candidates were first thought to be very good cryptography, such as the matrix based ones, but it turned out to be trivially breakable with a common desktop. There were others that required a "seed key" much like ZK-SNARKS as its basis that would allow anyone with the "throw-away" key to unlock everything encrypted with it. There turned out to only be one that "won" the competition and that is what the crapto-fudsters are telling us "we need" to switch over to "before it's too late!"...

Tuk guy is an intelligence asset IMHO.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6T6ns5uabPo

Nostr event nevent1qqsqcaexack30q79pc50uzctp7w8hlw6e70mq7kj052mdw7j4jjht9gpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumtfde5kymmvwshxjmnxdupzps0f4va9dg4tdjjta06yafjt9ldyptrrz85gdw5xk3jjz6wt266r70zxkp

2026-04-01T04:53:14Z

Why do I care about Kuwait?

People who dump on @nprofile…uh0e are gay and retarded

2026-04-01T04:52:13Z

People who dump on jack mallers (nprofile…uh0e) are gay and retarded

@nprofile…azkh > Hacker News

2026-04-01T04:49:25Z

stackernews (nprofile…azkh) > Hacker News

Wild rice is proof-of-work rice. Uncle Ben's 10-minute ...

2026-03-31T17:56:13Z

Wild rice is proof-of-work rice.

Uncle Ben's 10-minute parboiled white rice is fiat rice.

Involuntarily servitude is moral when you are serving other ...

2026-03-31T17:49:11Z

In reply to nevent1q…2l80
_________________________

Involuntarily servitude is moral when you are serving other people's ideals of justice

At least now Anthropic and China aren't the only ones that ...

2026-03-31T17:47:25Z

In reply to nevent1q…cneh
_________________________

At least now Anthropic and China aren't the only ones that have access to the source.

Quantum is a mirage

2026-03-31T17:42:33Z

In reply to nevent1q…h3pz
_________________________

Quantum is a mirage

Is this tuk wearing fag from canada or something?

2026-03-31T17:40:44Z

In reply to nevent1q…w5c6
_________________________

Is this tuk wearing fag from canada or something?

The question of whether BIP110 makes Bitcoin censorable cannot be ...

2026-03-31T15:08:50Z

The question of whether BIP110 makes Bitcoin censorable cannot be answered until “censorship” is defined with precision, because most disagreement stems from conflating fundamentally different mechanisms under a single moral label. In the context of Bitcoin, censorship should be defined as the enforced prevention of inclusion of a valid transaction into the blockchain despite the existence of a willing miner and sufficient fee. This definition is specific and necessary: the transaction must be valid under consensus rules, there must be at least one miner willing to include it, and some mechanism must prevent that inclusion from occurring. If any of these elements are missing, the situation is not censorship but rather invalidity, lack of demand, or voluntary refusal.

Bitcoin operates across distinct layers that must not be collapsed into one another: consensus rules determine what is valid, policy rules determine what nodes relay or store, and economic behavior determines what miners choose to include in blocks. True censorship can only occur at the consensus layer or through external coercion that effectively overrides miner choice. Policy-level decisions, by themselves, do not meet this threshold. BIP110 operates at the policy layer. It influences what transactions nodes are willing to relay or prioritize, but it does not change what transactions are valid under consensus, nor does it prevent miners from including those transactions in blocks. A transaction filtered by policy remains valid, can still be mined, and can still propagate through alternative paths. There is no mechanism introduced that enforces its exclusion from the chain.

The claim that denying non-financial transactions constitutes censorship depends on an overly broad definition in which any exclusion is labeled as censorship. This collapses the distinction between refusal to subsidize and coercive suppression. Nodes in Bitcoin are not obligated to carry all data, relay all transactions, or optimize for all possible uses of block space. They are sovereign actors operating under cost constraints. Refusing to relay or prioritize certain transaction types is not equivalent to preventing their inclusion; it is a form of resource selection within a competitive system. If a miner is willing to include a transaction and the sender pays an adequate fee, the transaction can still be confirmed. The system remains permissionless at the level that matters.

Bitcoin is not a neutral data substrate; it is a constrained system designed to preserve decentralization under limited bandwidth, storage, and validation costs. These constraints are not arbitrary but are the mechanism by which permissionless verification is maintained. If arbitrary data is allowed to compete equally with monetary transactions without any policy-level filtering, the cost of running a node increases, fewer participants can independently validate the system, and control concentrates. At that point, actual censorship—at the consensus level—becomes feasible. In this sense, unbounded inclusion at the policy layer undermines the very property of uncensorability that is being defended.

Framing Bitcoin as either a “timechain” or a “financial system” creates a false dichotomy. It is both, but its constraints are tuned for reliable monetary settlement. Non-financial uses are not prohibited, but they are not guaranteed equal priority. That prioritization is not an act of tyranny; it is an optimization aligned with the system’s core function. The introduction of arbitrary or potentially incriminating data further raises the stakes by introducing legal risk to node operators, which can deter participation and accelerate centralization. If participation declines, enforcement power concentrates, and the system becomes more vulnerable to genuine censorship pressures.

Bitcoin is not governed democratically in the sense of collective decree. It evolves through the independent choices of node operators adopting software, miners responding to fee incentives, and the broader market coordinating around those behaviors. Policy changes like BIP110 are not acts of imposed authority but expressions of voluntary alignment within these constraints.

Under a precise definition, BIP110 does not make Bitcoin censorable because it does not prevent valid transactions from being included by willing miners. It represents a policy-level adjustment in how resources are allocated and propagated across the network. Exclusion at this layer is not coercive suppression but selective participation. The failure to distinguish between these leads to the mistaken conclusion that any filtering is censorship. In reality, preserving the uncensorable transfer of value requires maintaining the conditions under which no single actor or coordinated group can enforce exclusion at the consensus level, and policy-level discretion is one of the mechanisms by which those conditions are sustained.

We have about 100 years left in this period of Satan's rule. ...

2026-03-31T12:12:17Z

In reply to nevent1q…j9qr
_________________________

We have about 100 years left in this period of Satan's rule. It's only going to get worse. This is why we need Bitcoin and nostr.

What does Nostr and Bitcoin have in common? Uncensorable

2026-03-31T12:04:17Z

What does Nostr and Bitcoin have in common?

Uncensorable