{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1xv3g4rkhj7eyape0cqjhc9g4ljdu5axqkgcdewma854a8r7e0mtsl5j2ga","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1xv3g4rkhj7eyape0cqjhc9g4ljdu5axqkgcdewma854a8r7e0mtsl5j2ga","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-08-10\n📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA1\n\nReplying because.\n\nOn 08/10/2015 10:14 AM, Pieter Wuille wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e On Aug 10, 2015 7:03 PM, \"odinn via bitcoin-dev\" \n\u003e \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org \n\u003e \u003cmailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e\u003e wrote: Note that\n\u003e I've\n\u003e\u003e been in favor of going ahead with Cameron Garnham's dynamic\n\u003e\u003e softfork proposal right now, which can be seen at\n\u003e\u003e http://is.gd/DiFuRr\n\u003e \n\u003e No offence, but I think that anyone who claims a block size limit\n\u003e change can be done as a soft fork has some basic reading to do\n\u003e first.\n\nTechnically, my proposal has been thus:\n\n\"Note that I've\nbeen in favor of going ahead with Cameron Garnham's dynamic softfork\nproposal right now, which can be seen at http://is.gd/DiFuRr - testing\nit out, seeing how that works, and at the same time making\npreparations for moving forward with Garzik's BIP 100 (which could be\ntailored or refined based on additional data gathered, without being\nturned into a controversial fork\"\n\nTo have quoted it only in part was unfair.\n\n\u003e \n\u003e Also, please keep this thread about Lightning.\n\nAgreed.\n\n\u003e \n\u003e -- Pieter\n\u003e \n\n- -- \nhttp://abis.io ~\n\"a protocol concept to enable decentralization\nand expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good\"\nhttps://keybase.io/odinn\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\nVersion: GnuPG v1\n\niQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVyOMjAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CmAQIAI5XrAIa8VrkFYLtJ8s0CHqj\nkZrMatH2oVGGaENVChVDU7u4SGnMQdiJF32QY5Olih3ia1rAx9n43tiyPyUp8y0S\niLudwFfyvmzSyRdoLnTRbDYkiNUnuy9lppZsL+AtQWCpMLxBIObs1NnzP7je4Qn2\na8lWklMf9mmlCyhyah7kJPdZzECwfpz2ARk68iUUAuqqLcFM2afmzcgLh2PuDRhU\n6Hjw7crTXA5AhPSeNNz1az0cq5MTUv46SAr3mbAiMjFwz7tFWSWEGMTaTdQ/Igwe\nJeMARTJuxY7QL1XHAmKgfHUEi6mmW2LiG0vm6xp8XnRfsUNfDVZ8IsmYky7kDLM=\n=5Aay\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----"}