{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1wccnjljxnarlx564vuc37hmuzuffurljevjnmuq4u0vjmh7e933sn3hnuq","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1wccnjljxnarlx564vuc37hmuzuffurljevjnmuq4u0vjmh7e933sn3hnuq","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-03-27\n📝 Original message:On 03/27/2014 05:14 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:\n\u003e That said, I'm not convinced about the extra layers. The \"cointype\" in\n\u003e my opinion isn't necessary inside the derivation. There is already\n\u003e support (4 bytes!) for magic bytes in the serialized form. Inside\n\nCointype in path is for separation purposes, not for identification.\n\n-- \nBest Regards / S pozdravom,\n\nPavol Rusnak \u003cstick at gk2.sk\u003e"}