{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1xqshkqv2g7uea4xzqwvmgjcz7u8vfavw6aazs999v0azsv3w7u3qpymc2p","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1xqshkqv2g7uea4xzqwvmgjcz7u8vfavw6aazs999v0azsv3w7u3qpymc2p","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-03-13\n📝 Original message:On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Jeff Garzik \u003cjgarzik at bitpay.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Resurrecting this topic.  Bitcoin Wallet moved to mBTC several weeks\n\u003e ago, which was disappointing -- it sounded like the consensus was\n\u003e uBTC, and moving to uBTC later --which will happen-- may result in\n\u003e additional user confusion, thanks to yet another decimal place\n\u003e transition.\n\u003e\n\nI've kind of given up getting any consensus about this, or even getting\npeople to care.\n\nEveryone agrees that a decimal shift would be good, but it's the same\nboring shed painting discussion every time on how many decimals. In the end\nnothing happens.\n\nI can't really blame Andreas for finally taking action and making the\nchange to mBTC. People in the community are familiar with mBTC because some\nexchanges and price sites used mBTC (at least for a while when \u003e$1000),\nalso mBTC seems to be catching on on reddit etc.\n\nMoving to muBTC (which in itself would be better because it is the final\nunit change ever needed without hardfork) would require more coordinated\neducation effort.\n\nWladimir\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140313/ff0ee5e1/attachment.html\u003e"}