{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2012-11-26\n📝 Original message:\u003e Perhaps we should agree to talk about everything _except_ that first?\n\nYeah, alternatives to X.509 chains don't interest me right now except\nin the sense that they should be cleanly implementable with future\nextensions.\n\nSo if you care about DANE or DNSSEC or custom PKI infrastructures or\nwhatever, rather than proposing them as replacements here (DOA), just\nfigure out how you would extend the protocol in Gavins mail in a\nfuture extension. If you can't see a clean way to do it then let's\ndiscuss that. If you can think of a way to do it then let's table it.\nBetter replacements can come in later BIPs."}