{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"hylomorphic (npub18z…zlyv6)","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"nostr:nprofile1qqsvgd5v2yh8pcm9trapv7t8e4eleqag4yr75w9na45rtr7tm74smfspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhszrnhwden5te0dehhxtnvdakz736lmtm nostr:nprofile1qqsrcn632cfyx5j0xpld9m389370ffuzgp8muwshvcrqgwm26sn7uacpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqzxrhwden5te0wfjkccte9eekummjwsh8xmmrd9skcgads8n \nHey guys, I’ve read through what I think is all of the tread, sorry if i missed something.\n\nGood discussion, these are really important ideas.\n\nI don’t know the best way to respond given the depth and breadth of the thread, but here are some ideas which came to my mind.\n\nGodel’s Incompletness Theorems mathematically prove no formal system can capture all the truths within its structure.  \n\nThat’s really the form of any error we make when trying to shoe horn reality, a hylomorphic phenomenon, into an either or.\n\nForm and matter: there is a physical world, and there immaterial order.\nThe relation between both is reality.\n\nSo out of the blocks, the “physics explains reality” is doomed\n\nIt describes a part, not the whole.\n\nAny system which excludes the coherent possblility of its origin can never be an account of the whole.\n\nif you arrive at an “infinite regress” or “something from nothing” as your account for the origin, understand you have arrived at the undefeated impasses\n\nThis is why you run into trouble with your conception of time.  \nA discrete measure, presupposes a the continuous, so we can’t deny the present. time presupposes an eternal/comtinuous now.\n\nAristole wrestled with these problems 2000 years ago, and he accepted the impasses on both extremes and and arrived at what Gödel proves later with math.\n\n\nWe have a 111k word manuscript on this exact relation.\n\nthe physics stuff is great about that part of reality, we just can’t mistake it for the whole"}