{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"Contra (npub14h…xjjzu)","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub14hq5lgadtyy9dhvtszq46dnl0s0xwdddqr7e32rdqqhma8a4xhsspxjjzu","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"Someone’s going to say verifying a blockchain and verifying a resurrection aren’t the same kind of proof. Let’s kill that before it lands.\n\nMath is immaterial, it’s not made of atoms, yet it governs physical reality perfectly, every time, everywhere, zero exceptions. Nobody’s ever seen the number 7. You’ve only ever seen 7 things. The number itself is abstract and unchanging, the exact properties something needs to be transcendent. Bitcoiners already trust an immaterial mathematical law to secure their entire net worth without blinking. You’ve been living inside a transcendental argument for God this whole time, just calling it rationalism.\n\nHistorical claims get verified differently than blockchains, and that’s fine, the tool matches the claim. You don’t run a node to confirm Caesar crossed the Rubicon either. You check sources, hostile witnesses, martyrdom, timeline. Same method historians use for every ancient event you already accept without a fight. The resurrection gets held to a standard nothing else in history has to clear.\n\nAnd before problem of evil gets dragged in to change the subject, moral outrage at suffering only makes sense if good and evil are real categories, not chemical preference. You need God’s moral law standing to even file the complaint against Him.\n\nVerify the math. Verify the history. Neither one bends for a double standard.\n#ToChristAlone #Math #DontTrustVerify #AskNostr #Christianity"}