{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-03-13\n📝 Original message:That would be rather new and tricky legal territory.\n\nBut even putting the legal issues to one side, there are definitional\nissues.\n\nFor instance if the Chainalysis nodes started following the protocol specs\nbetter and became just regular nodes that happen to keep logs, would that\nstill be a violation? If so, what about blockchain.info? It'd be shooting\nourselves in the foot to try and forbid block explorers given how useful\nthey are.\n\nIf someone non-maliciously runs some nodes with debug logging turned on,\nand makes full system backups every night, and keeps those backups for\nyears, are they in violation of whatever pseudo-law is involved?\n\nI think it's a bit early to think about these things right now. Michael\nGrønager and Jan Møller have been Bitcoin hackers for a long time. I'd be\ninterested to know their thoughts on all of this.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150313/b0d0085a/attachment.html\u003e"}