{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub10etkvm8l0jr0jsgdx02dxnhnu5g989dnca90guj5rklwkaplnh3sgjc727","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub10etkvm8l0jr0jsgdx02dxnhnu5g989dnca90guj5rklwkaplnh3sgjc727","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2014-01-15\n📝 Original message:Might I propose \"reusable address\".\n\nI think that describes it best to any non-programmer, and even more so  \nencourages wallets to present options as 'one time use' vs 'reusable'.\n\nIt definitely packs a marketing punch which could help drive adoption. The  \nfeature is only useful if/when broadly adopted.\n\nI think it meets all the criteria required:\n\n   - Communication between parties is a single message from the payee,  \nwhich may be public\n   - Multiple payments to the same address are not publicly linkable on the  \nblockchain\n   - The payee has explicitly designated they expect to receive more than  \none payment at that address\n   - Payer can publicly prove they made a payment to the reusable address  \nby revealing a secret\n\nI have high hopes for this feature. The war *against* address reuse may  \nsoon be a distant memory.\n\nOn Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:44:17 -0800, Jeff Garzik \u003cjgarzik at bitpay.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \"static address\" seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intended  \n\u003e use/direction.\n\u003e\n\u003e On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Gregory Maxwell \u003cgmaxwell at gmail.com\u003e  \n\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Ben Davenport  \n\u003e\u003e \u003cbendavenport at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e\u003e But may I suggest we consider changing the name \"stealth address\" to\n\u003e\u003e\u003e something more neutral?\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e ACK.  Regardless of the 'political' overtones, I think stealth is a\n\u003e\u003e little cringe-worthy.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e \"Private address\" would be fine if not for confusion with private-keys.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e \"Static address\" is perhaps the best in my view. (also helps improve\n\u003e\u003e awareness that normal addresses are intended to be more one-use-ness)\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140115/8d3a6dc5/attachment.html\u003e"}