{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2022-04-24\n📝 Original message:On April 22, 2022 11:03:51 AM GMT+02:00, Zac Greenwood via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003eI like the maxim of Peter Todd: any change of Bitcoin must benefit *all*\n\u003eusers. This means that every change must have well-defined and transparent\n\u003ebenefits. Personally I believe that the only additions to the protocol that\n\u003ewould still be acceptable are those that clearly benefit layer 2 solutions\n\u003esuch as LN *and* do not carry the dangerous potential of getting abused by\n\u003efreeloaders selling commercial services on top of “free” eternal storage on\n\u003ethe blockchain.\n\nTo strengthen your point: benefiting \"all users\" can only be done by benefiting layer 2 solutions in some way, because it's inevitable that the vast majority of users will use layer 2 because that's the only known way that Bitcoin can scale."}