{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1dmpy2z9v4nr2np0zjs5he433zphdjy8qkxa4xh04xc9d58n0yjes6y809s","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1dmpy2z9v4nr2np0zjs5he433zphdjy8qkxa4xh04xc9d58n0yjes6y809s","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2022-06-16\n📝 Original message:alicexbt wrote:\n\u003e I do not have issues with multiple RBF policies being tried out and full-rbf being one of them. My disagreements are with rationale, lack of basic options in Bitcoin Core to employ/disable different RBF policies and a few arguments made in support for full-rbf. Whether it appears strawman or offtopic on github, there should be a place to share these disagreements.\n\nBitcoin Core is open source software, where developers open pull\nrequests to try to get them merged after review. If you see a \"lack of\nbasic options\" and no one has opened a pull request for it, it may be\nfor two reasons. First, it could be that it just doesn't make sense,\nso no one sees a point in implementing it. Secondly, it may be that it\nisn't on anyone's list of priorities. In the second case, you are\nwelcome to share your preference once. Moreover, no one is holding you\nback to implement it yourself and suggest a pull request. However,\nrepeatedly demanding others to do it for you is not helpful in open\nsource software development.\n\ncndm1"}