{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrs","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrs","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2012-05-24\n📝 Original message:On Thursday, May 24, 2012 4:33:12 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:\n\u003e Comments?  It wouldn't be a problem if these no-TX blocks were not\n\u003e already getting frequent (1 in 20).\n\nFWIW, based on statistics for Eligius's past 100 blocks, it seems 10% (1 in \n10) of 1-txn blocks is not actually unreasonable. This also means these 1-txn \nmined blocks are not necessarily harming Bitcoin intentionally. Anyone care to \nfigure out the math for how fast miners need to finish processing transactions \nto reduce the number of 1txn blocks?"}