{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1ep4j5tjp6cd2774hrx96vh845dwqzhe3z7n3a2a9uxdm2dajqpgscm3rel","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1ep4j5tjp6cd2774hrx96vh845dwqzhe3z7n3a2a9uxdm2dajqpgscm3rel","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2012-05-02\n📝 Original message:This discussion about ordering is absolutely retarded. Once the list fills up, then it won't matter. For now I'm deciding the ordering with Bitcoin-Qt first and the others ordered however. That was nobody can try to game the system (it remains unexploitable).\n\nIf there are no objections, then I am going to merge this branch. The forum thread is divulging into a mess all over the place, and this conversation can go on forever discussing the silly fine details:\n\nhttp://hackerspaces.org/wiki/The_Bikeshed_Anti-PatternProblem:\nYou suggest creating something new for your hackerspace, like a \nbikeshed.  But now all anyone will discuss is its colour. No bikeshed \nwill be built.\n\nArmory \u0026 MultiBit, are you OK with that description? I will check with ThomasV about Electrum.\n\n\n________________________________\nFrom: Gary Rowe \u003cg.rowe at froot.co.uk\u003e\nTo: \"bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\" \u003cbitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\u003e \nSent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 8:34 PM\nSubject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page\n\n\nHow about keeping it simple?\n\nBitcoin-Qt\n* Requires the entire blockchain\n* Standalone client\n* Designed for continuous operation\n* Available for Windows, Mac, Linux with installer\n* Developed in C\n* Website: https://bitcoin.org\n\nMultiBit\n* Requires a reduced blockchain \n* Standalone client\n* Designed for occasional use\n* Available for Windows, Mac, Linux with installer\n* Developed in Java  \n* Website: http://multibit.org\n\nArmory\n* Requires the entire blockchain\n* Dependent client of Bitcoin-Qt \n* Designed for occasional use\n* Available for Windows (64-bit only), Mac, Linux (self-build)\n* Developed in Python\n* Website: http://bitcoinarmory.com/\n\nElectrum\n* Requires no blockchain\n* Dependent client of Bitcoin-Qt (on server)\n* Designed for occasional use\n* Available for Windows, Linux (self-build)\n* Developed in Python\n* Website: http://ecdsa.org/electrum/\n\nBitcoin Wallet (Android client)\n* Requires a reduced blockchain\n* Standalone client\n* Designed for occasional use on mobile\n* Available for Android only\n* Developed in Java\n* Website: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.schildbach.wallet\u0026hl=en\n\n\nOn 2 May 2012 20:25, Amir Taaki \u003czgenjix at yahoo.com\u003e wrote:\n\nThis is like the most annoying thing about email. Often with group emails, we'll be having a conversation then someone will click reply instead of group reply and the convo will go on for a while. Eventually I'll realise the persons are missing and add them back in.\n\u003e\n\u003eOn Yahoo mail (which I use for spam/mailing lists), to do reply all involves clicking a tab, scrolling down and clicking Reply All. Normally I instead go through the steps of reply, delete To, re-enter bitco... select drop down, click send.\n\u003e\n\u003eAnyone know how to make reply all the default in mutt? And how can I exclude it from re-including my own email when I do a group reply so I don't get the same email again.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e----- Original Message -----\n\u003eFrom: Jeff Garzik \u003cjgarzik at exmulti.com\u003e\n\u003eTo: grarpamp \u003cgrarpamp at gmail.com\u003e\n\u003eCc: bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003eSent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 7:29 PM\n\u003eSubject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003eOn Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, grarpamp \u003cgrarpamp at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e\u003e Try \"Reply to All\"\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e That puts the sender in 'to' and list in 'cc',\n\u003e\u003e which dupes to the sender and eventually\n\u003e\u003e blows out the to and cc lines as everyone\n\u003e\u003e chimes in and doesn't trim. 'reply to' solves\n\u003e\u003e most of that. assuming the list sw can do it.\n\u003e\n\u003e\"Reply-To\" Munging Considered Harmful\n\u003ehttp://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e--\n\u003eJeff Garzik\n\u003eexMULTI, Inc.\n\u003ejgarzik at exmulti.com\n\u003e\n\u003e------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003eLive Security Virtual Conference\n\u003eExclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and\n\u003ethreat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions\n\u003ewill include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware\n\u003ethreats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/\n\u003e_______________________________________________\n\u003eBitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003eBitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003ehttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003eLive Security Virtual Conference\n\u003eExclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and\n\u003ethreat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions\n\u003ewill include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware\n\u003ethreats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/\n\u003e_______________________________________________\n\u003eBitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003eBitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003ehttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\n\n------------------------------------------------------------------------------\nLive Security Virtual Conference\nExclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and \nthreat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions \nwill include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware \nthreats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/\n_______________________________________________\nBitcoin-development mailing list\nBitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\nhttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development"}