{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1j3u42vq63qzs2nyddgkf4s4t7pa85x855vas54e6yauxsvpf2wcsacwg9h","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1j3u42vq63qzs2nyddgkf4s4t7pa85x855vas54e6yauxsvpf2wcsacwg9h","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-09-28\n📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA256\n\n+1\nI was actually waiting for this. It makes 'smart contracts' simpler\nand better from many points of view.\n\nPete I don't see anything about RCLTV in BIP65, was that a separate\nBIP? Which one is it and are we also deploying it via\nIsSuperMajority()? RCLTV in addition to CLTV would be trivial so maybe\nwe can take the pain just once?\n\nOn 9/27/2015 9:50 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e Summary -------\n\u003e \n\u003e It's time to deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY.\n\u003e \n\u003e I've backported the CLTV op-code and a IsSuperMajority() soft-fork\n\u003e to the v0.10 and v0.11 branches, pull-reqs #6706 and #6707\n\u003e respectively. A pull-req for git HEAD for the soft-fork deployment\n\u003e has been open since June 28th, #6351 - the opcode implementation\n\u003e itself was merged two months ago.\n\u003e \n\u003e We should release a v0.10.3 and v0.11.1 with CLTV and get the ball \n\u003e rolling on miner adoption. We have consensus that we need CLTV, we\n\u003e have a well tested implementation, and we have a well-tested\n\u003e deployment mechanism. We also don't need to wait for other\n\u003e soft-fork proposals to catch up - starting the CLTV deployment\n\u003e process isn't going to delay future soft-forks, or for that matter,\n\u003e hard-forks.\n\u003e \n\u003e I think it's possible to safely get CLTV live on mainnet before the\n\u003e end of the year. It's time we get this over with and done.\n\u003e \n\u003e \n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\nVersion: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)\n\niQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWCRIeAAoJEIN/pSyBJlsRlqgH/iir3Ao99WMNV0xC5RL+fv/Q\nJ1az1dXif9w9sTaCZMkENyIH9B2kwmOcPX/pU+p75qNvhQi9OrNMNRE8Wlwa+tcL\nDD9DbyiQvxKdXjCnZqUyyIgBjuFbiF5VNQ67B1faEnzvmX81PoDjd2FPC51WChjZ\nj7xPcJ73d23OPXpsKtyaUwn1QbGwprhFCEkcqjC50gw/IQkMJiqZ6pMepDVSyGKl\nRpOsWCyCVoTJtM5NFk7wXg5LBFA7rXXQL56M00YJKLJAx/ooGb2T4ZRX0GeEWX8/\nwquNA9Bj7picIr20sPohGE0cr2QiD3gmL9qLT2ZDlrFFDk8thL8afOx00Z6ih3I=\n=dPXd\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----"}