{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-06-16\n📝 Original message:Hi Bryan,\n\nSpecifically, when Adam mentioned your conversations with non-technical\n\u003e people, he did not mean \"Mike has talked with people who have possibly not\n\u003e made pull requests to Bitcoin Core, so therefore Mike is a non-programmer\".\n\u003e\n\nYes, my comment was prickly and grumpy. No surprises, I did not sleep well\nlast night.\n\nI am upset about this constant insistence from Adam, Gregory and others\nthat the \"technical community\" or \"technical majority\" agree with them and\nanyone who doesn't is \"non technical\" or \"not a contributor\" or not an\nexpert or not had things properly explained to them.\n\nThis is not true and needs to stop. Gavin and I have both been working on\nBitcoin in substantial ways for longer than Gregory and Adam have been in\nthe community at all. We are extremely technical, as are many of the people\nwho want us to release XT+larger blocks. We cannot make progress in any\nkind of negotiation if one side constantly blows off the other and refuses\nto take anything they say seriously, which has been a feature of this\n\"debate\" from the start.\n\nIn contrast Gavin and I have written vast amounts of analysis on the\nconcerns raised by larger blocks. So many hours were spent, we could\nprobably fill a small book by now. We have carefully read and addressed\n*dozens* of points raised by the 1mb camp. We have also done our best to\nopen this debate to the whole community.\n\nSo it would be nice if the people who are so keen on 1mb blocks show the\nsame respect to us.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150616/15732844/attachment.html\u003e"}
