{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2018-01-23\n📝 Original message:On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:19 PM, Rhavar via bitcoin-dev\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e Interesting. I didn't think about this before, but it seems like bip125 is\n\u003e rather incentive incompatible right now? If we're assuming a competitive\n\u003e mempool, it really doesn't seem generally rational to accept a replacement\n\u003e transaction of a lower fee rate.\n\nBIP125 replacement requires that the fee rate increases.  The text of\nthe BIP document is written in a confusing way that doesn't make this\nclear."}