{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2012-09-10\n📝 Original message:On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Matthew Mitchell\n\u003cmatthewmitchell at godofgod.co.uk\u003e wrote:\n\u003e Here is a BIP draft for improving the block relaying and validation so that\n\u003e it can be done in parallel and so that redundancy can be removed. This\n\u003e becomes more beneficial the larger the block sizes are.\n\u003e\n\u003e https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:MatthewLM/ImprovedBlockRelayingProposal\n\nWhy does this focus on actually sending the hash tree?  The block\nheader + transaction list + transactions a node doesn't already know\n(often just the coinbase) is enough."}