{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub12rkw0jajmsck4uwdtksdvtswrlkypusfryjzera7m4fhqta6jhdsz3aqxc","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub12rkw0jajmsck4uwdtksdvtswrlkypusfryjzera7m4fhqta6jhdsz3aqxc","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2013-12-03\n📝 Original message:I dont like the idea of putting the min fee in the hands of the receiver.\nSeems like that will work against the best interests of senders in the long\nrun.\n\nWhy not try a different path of calculating the min fee like difficulty\nretarget. You can analyse the last 2016 blocks to find the average fee\naccepted per kb (which would include transactions that were included\nwithout fees) and then write that into the block as a soft recommendation\nthat wallets could use in the UI. This way the price can vary up and down\naccording to what people were willing to spend on fees and miners willing\nto accept.\n\nI absolutely do not trust vendors to set fees. I think it has to be based\non what senders are willing to pay and what miners are willing to accept.\n\nDrak\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131203/17a85798/attachment.html\u003e"}