{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1fvd9jpjgn33ry4tt663e3fpsw5zysxzuacumergtweqhsa6ac9gqred8pr","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1fvd9jpjgn33ry4tt663e3fpsw5zysxzuacumergtweqhsa6ac9gqred8pr","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2012-11-26\n📝 Original message:Supporting DNSSEC/DANE in the future when they are widely deployed is a great idea.\n\nNote that the x509chain field is 'repeated', and any repeated field may have zero entries. So I would suggest supporting other PKI systems in the future by adding optional new fields (for maximum compatibility or security merchants might want to include both a x509chain AND \n\n--\nGavin Andresen"}