{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-05-08\n📝 Original message:There are certainly arguments to be made for and against all of these\nproposals.\n\nThe fixed 20mb cap isn't actually my proposal at all, it is from Gavin. I\nam supporting it because anything is better than nothing. Gavin originally\nproposed the block size be a function of time. That got dropped, I suppose\nto make the process of getting consensus easier. It is \"the simplest thing\nthat can possibly work\".\n\nI would like to see the process of chain forking becoming less traumatic. I\nremember Gavin, Jeff and I once considered (on stage at a conference??)\nthat maybe there should be a scheduled fork every year, so people know when\nto expect them.\n\nIf everything goes well, I see no reason why 20mb would be the limit\nforever.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150508/557fa94d/attachment.html\u003e"}