{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1fvuxqdqg7klqqgy3yy8gdxjv4phu92sll5y8zqm2qe5qdrhxymhqf3vq7f","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1fvuxqdqg7klqqgy3yy8gdxjv4phu92sll5y8zqm2qe5qdrhxymhqf3vq7f","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2017-05-09\n📝 Original message:\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e You suggested \"If the maximum block weight is set to 2.7M, each byte of\n\u003e non-witness block costs 1.7\", but these numbers dont work out - setting\n\u003e the discount to 1.7 gets you a maximum block size of 1.7MB (in a soft\n\u003e fork), not 2.7MB.\n\n\nYes. In a soft-fork is true.\nI was thinking about what a HF could do to optimize the balance, and I\nforgot I was in the context of a SF.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170509/473e88df/attachment.html\u003e"}