{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"hylomorphic (npub18z…zlyv6)","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"i have nothing to say about what any individual thinks best serves their own interests in bitcoin. \n\nBut when a person says BIP110 is good or bad, they enter the dialogue and are attempting to persuade others what is in their best interests.\n\nEntering the ethical domain implies rational standards external to any one person. it is no longer simply about “what you think best serves your interest.”\n\nyou have to be this tall to ride, and if you cannot make an affirmative case for why X Y or Z is good for another person, you simply aren’t tall enough for rational discourse.\n\namorphous claims about the “greater good of bitcoin” don’t count.\nself contradictory arguments about cEnSoRShIp don’t count.\nsophistry about spam doesn’t count\n\nbitcoin is a tool, and only you can give it purpose.\n\nso whatever you use it for, run the software that best serves you.\n\nif you have cutting to be done, keep your blade sharp.\n\nSo when i slow down, take a breath, and examine the arguments deliberately in the light of reason, it’s not hard to see what actions align with my interests.\n\nBitcoin is only money to me, so I am running #knots:29.3.10 becuase it best serves my needs\n\nJust be honest with yourself about what you use bitcoin for."}