{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub14h948ndawt32ps3y225sslch8344tmw8k5z0lxuxr6wq9tu6sl2qj9yjx0","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub14h948ndawt32ps3y225sslch8344tmw8k5z0lxuxr6wq9tu6sl2qj9yjx0","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2017-03-29\n📝 Original message:On Mar 29, 2017 12:20 PM, \"Andrew Johnson\" \u003candrew.johnson83 at gmail.com\u003e\nwrote:\n\nWhat's stopping these users from running a pruned node?  Not every node\nneeds to store a complete copy of the blockchain.\n\n\nPruned nodes are not the default configuration, if it was the default\nconfiguration then I think you would see far more users running a pruned\nnode.\n\nBut that would also substantially increase the burden on archive nodes.\n\n\nFurther discussion about disk space requirements should be taken to another\nthread.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170329/9f1bb665/attachment.html\u003e"}