{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kw","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kw","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2013-12-02\n📝 Original message:On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Mike Hearn \u003cmike at plan99.net\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e PPv1 doesn't have any notion of fee unfortunately. I suppose it could be\n\u003e added easily, but we also need to launch the existing feature set.\n\u003e\n\nLets bang out a merchant-pays-fee extension.\n\nHow about:\n\nSPEC:\n\n    optional uint64 allowfee    tag number=1000\n\nAllow up to allowfee satoshis to be deducted from the amount paid to be\nused to pay Bitcoin network transaction fees. A wallet implementation must\nnot reduce the amount paid for fees more than allowfee, and transaction\nfees must be equal to or greater than the amount reduced.\n\n:ENDSPEC\n\nRationale: we don't want wallet software giving users discounts-- sending\ntransactions that are amount-allowfee without paying any fee.  We also want\nto allow users to pay MORE in fees, if they need to (fragmented wallet,\nmaybe, or big CoinJoin transaction) or decide to.\n\n\nPS: I think there was also consensus that the BIP72  request=...   should\nbe shortened to just r=... (save 6 chars in QR codes).  Unless somebody\nobjects, I'll change the BIP and the reference implementation code to make\nit so...\n\n-- \n--\nGavin Andresen\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131203/6bd7b54f/attachment.html\u003e"}