{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"Tom Harding [ARCHIVE] (npub1ms…pmwjy)","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1msef5qkfwz4t7qacwxz775wgdtlytph78g2g2z903x90874u263sypmwjy","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-02-12\n📝 Original message:On 2/12/2015 6:25 AM, Tamas Blummer wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e Miner will see a mixed picture and will struggle to act “honestly” on \n\u003e a statistical measure.\n\nThe statistics come from the aggregate actions of all nodes, especially \nthose miners who watch p2p transactions and assemble blocks.\n\nAny one node makes deterministic decisions based on its own observation \n-- just like today's valid/invalid decision based on whether a blocktime \nis within the next 2 hours or not.\n\nThe idea is that miners will exclude respends because they put the block \nat risk of being forked off, with no offsetting payback.  The design \npoint is to make sure this is sufficiently unlikely to happen \naccidentally, or via some attack vector."}