{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","author_name":"npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","author_url":"https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.ae","html":"📅 Original date posted:2015-06-19\n📝 Original message:On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:33:03AM -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote:\n\u003e I just sent the following email to F2Pool:\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e I was disappointed to see Peter Todd claiming that you have (or will?) run\n\u003e his replace-by-fee patch.\n\u003e \n\u003e I strongly encourage you to wait until most wallet software supports\n\u003e replace-by-fee before doing that, because until that happens replace-by-fee\n\u003e just makes it easier to steal from bitcoin-accepting merchants.\n\nDo you mean just full-RBF, or FSS-RBF as well?\n\n\nSpeaking of, could we get a confirmation that Coinbase is, or is not,\none of the merchant service providers trying to get hashing power\ncontracts with mining pools for guaranteed transaction acceptance? IIRC\nyou are still an advisor to them. This is a serious concern for the\nreasons I outlined in my post.\n\nEqually if anyone else from Coinbase would like to chime in that'd be\ngreat.\n\n-- \n'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n00000000000000000d7110f3a176228445ed710afd332291384992ed89c5c1a7\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 650 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150619/59a7a058/attachment.sig\u003e"}